The popular notion that a tree's age can be determined by : GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR) - Page 2
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 17 Jan 2017, 21:23

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# The popular notion that a tree's age can be determined by

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Status: Bell the GMAT!!!
Affiliations: Aidha
Joined: 16 Aug 2011
Posts: 183
Location: Singapore
Concentration: Finance, General Management
GMAT 1: 680 Q46 V37
GMAT 2: 620 Q49 V27
GMAT 3: 700 Q49 V36
WE: Other (Other)
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 72 [2] , given: 43

Re: The popular notion that a tree's age can be determined by [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Sep 2011, 21:20
2
KUDOS
IMO E

hogann wrote:
The popular notion that a tree's age can be determined by counting the number of internal rings in its trunk is generally true. However, to help regulate the internal temperature of the tree, the outermost layers of wood of the Brazilian ash often peel away when the temperature exceeds 95 degrees Fahrenheit, leaving the tree with fewer rings than it would otherwise have. So only if the temperature in the Brazilian ash's environment never exceeds 95 degrees Fahrenheit will its rings be a reliable measure of the tree's age.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument above depends?

A. The growth of new rings in a tree is not a function of levels of precipitation. - out of scope to some extent as we are not given any information on precipitation. INCORRECT
B. Only the Brazilian ash loses rings because of excessive heat. - So what?? Anyways we are supposed to talk about brazilian ash tree only. INCORRECT
C. Only one day of temperatures above 95 degrees Fahrenheit is needed to cause the Brazilian ash to lose a ring.- again I would ask the same question - so what?? We are not concerned about for how much time certain temperature must remain rather we are concerned about the relationship between the temperature and the loss of rings. INCORRECT
D. The internal rings of all trees are of uniform thickness. - again out of scope. INCORRECT
E. The number of rings that will be lost when the temperature exceeds 95 degrees Fahrenheit is not predictable - An assumption is something which makes an argument complete. If the assumption were absent, the argument will fall apart. Here the conclusion is that only if temperature never exceeds 95 degrees, the age of tree will be predictable. What if the temperature also increases and still we are able to predict the age. The conclusion will not hold true in that case. Hence CORRECT

OA to come

_________________

If my post did a dance in your mind, send me the steps through kudos :)

My MBA journey at http://mbadilemma.wordpress.com/

Manager
Status: Target MBA
Joined: 20 Jul 2010
Posts: 211
Location: Singapore
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 12

Re: The popular notion that a tree's age can be determined by [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Sep 2011, 08:00
hogann wrote:
The popular notion that a tree's age can be determined by counting the number of internal rings in its trunk is generally true. However, to help regulate the internal temperature of the tree, the outermost layers of wood of the Brazilian ash often peel away when the temperature exceeds 95 degrees Fahrenheit, leaving the tree with fewer rings than it would otherwise have. So only if the temperature in the Brazilian ash's environment never exceeds 95 degrees Fahrenheit will its rings be a reliable measure of the tree's age.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument above depends?

A. The growth of new rings in a tree is not a function of levels of precipitation.
B. Only the Brazilian ash loses rings because of excessive heat.
C. Only one day of temperatures above 95 degrees Fahrenheit is needed to cause the Brazilian ash to lose a ring.
D. The internal rings of all trees are of uniform thickness.
E. The number of rings that will be lost when the temperature exceeds 95 degrees Fahrenheit is not predictable

OA to come

OA is E
_________________

Thanks and Regards,
GM.

Manager
Joined: 16 Aug 2011
Posts: 97
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 3

Re: The popular notion that a tree's age can be determined by [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Nov 2011, 23:08
last sentence of the argument doesnt sound correct to me.
BSchool Forum Moderator
Status: Flying over the cloud!
Joined: 16 Aug 2011
Posts: 912
Location: Viet Nam
Concentration: International Business, Marketing
GMAT Date: 06-06-2014
GPA: 3.07
Followers: 73

Kudos [?]: 600 [0], given: 44

Re: The popular notion that a tree's age can be determined by [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Dec 2011, 01:05
clearly E
_________________

Rules for posting in verbal gmat forum, read it before posting anything in verbal forum
Giving me + 1 kudos if my post is valuable with you

The more you like my post, the more you share to other's need

CR: Focus of the Week: Must be True Question

Manager
Joined: 07 Aug 2011
Posts: 186
Location: United States
Concentration: Technology, International Business
GMAT 1: 690 Q48 V37
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 23 [0], given: 6

Re: The popular notion that a tree's age can be determined by [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Dec 2011, 10:51
E
Director
Status: Enjoying the GMAT journey....
Joined: 26 Aug 2011
Posts: 735
Location: India
GMAT 1: 620 Q49 V24
Followers: 72

Kudos [?]: 504 [0], given: 264

Re: The popular notion that a tree's age can be determined by [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Jan 2012, 09:11
+ 1 E
_________________

Fire the final bullet only when you are constantly hitting the Bull's eye, till then KEEP PRACTICING.

A WAY TO INCREASE FROM QUANT 35-40 TO 47 : http://gmatclub.com/forum/a-way-to-increase-from-q35-40-to-q-138750.html

Q 47/48 To Q 50 + http://gmatclub.com/forum/the-final-climb-quest-for-q-50-from-q47-129441.html#p1064367

Three good RC strategies http://gmatclub.com/forum/three-different-strategies-for-attacking-rc-127287.html

Senior Manager
Joined: 13 Aug 2010
Posts: 314
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 1

Re: The popular notion that a tree's age can be determined by [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Jan 2012, 00:56
+1 for E
Manager
Joined: 16 Oct 2011
Posts: 135
Location: United States
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 5

Re: The popular notion that a tree's age can be determined by [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Mar 2012, 02:36
pual wrote:
I will choose "A"

Going with PoE

Round 1
A - This can be right
B - This is being clearly stated in the argument and is therefore not an assumption
C - This can be right
D - This is not at al relevant to the premise or the conclusion
E - This has also been stated in the argument and should therefore not be an assumption

Round 2
We are left with A and C.
"A" - "A" is more appropriate because it affects the conclusion directly, if this is the assumption only then conclusion can be true.
"C" - for how long the temprature should stay at 95 for the ring to shed is no where being mentioned either in the premise or in conclusion..it therefore seems un-related.

Well,

I think assumption is always not that easy, because, unlike strengthening questions, assumptions seldom uses outside info.

Also, negation is not a fool-proof process, because, even negating choices that are outside scope can be misleading.
For ex, we are concerned only about the heating aspect here, and its effect on the no. of rings.
However, negating A will also imply that, number of rings is not predictable(since precipitation may increase no. of rings when you negate A).
However, melting is beyond scope here and assumptions clarify the gap between prem. and concl. only.
Thanks,
Raghu
Senior Manager
Joined: 12 Mar 2012
Posts: 369
Concentration: Operations, Strategy
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 169 [0], given: 31

Re: The popular notion that a tree's age can be determined by [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Mar 2012, 04:51
straight E, rest are meaningless options
_________________

Practice Practice and practice...!!

If there's a loophole in my analysis--> suggest measures to make it airtight.

Manager
Joined: 10 Jan 2011
Posts: 244
Location: India
GMAT Date: 07-16-2012
GPA: 3.4
WE: Consulting (Consulting)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 57 [0], given: 25

Re: The popular notion that a tree's age can be determined by [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Mar 2012, 05:30
IMO E...

if we are ble to predict the # of rings lost due to high temparature, then we will able to predict the age of the tree.

negating E clearly makes the conclusion invalid.. hence E
_________________

-------Analyze why option A in SC wrong-------

Retired Moderator
Status: 2000 posts! I don't know whether I should feel great or sad about it! LOL
Joined: 04 Oct 2009
Posts: 1712
Location: Peru
Schools: Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, MIT & HKS (Government)
WE 1: Economic research
WE 2: Banking
WE 3: Government: Foreign Trade and SMEs
Followers: 96

Kudos [?]: 910 [0], given: 109

Re: The popular notion that a tree's age can be determined by [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Mar 2012, 17:17
+1 E

If it is possible to determine how many rings are lost after an increase in the temperature, it would be possible to determine the age of the tree.
_________________

"Life’s battle doesn’t always go to stronger or faster men; but sooner or later the man who wins is the one who thinks he can."

My Integrated Reasoning Logbook / Diary: http://gmatclub.com/forum/my-ir-logbook-diary-133264.html

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Manager
Joined: 28 Apr 2011
Posts: 195
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 6

Re: The popular notion that a tree's age can be determined by [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Apr 2012, 09:42
IMO E........

Intern
Joined: 19 Jan 2011
Posts: 10
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 51

Re: The popular notion that a tree's age can be determined by [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Apr 2012, 16:26
Nice explanation from..
http://www.manhattangmat.com/forums/mgm ... t3915.html

Conclusion: “ONLY if the temp in the Brazilian ash’s environment NEVER exceeds 95 degree F will its rings be a RELIABLE measure of the tree’s age.”

If we truly depend on a certain assumption to reach this conclusion, the conclusion should fall apart when we remove or negate the assumption.

Negate (A): The growth of new rings IS a function of precipitation levels.
Result: We could still conclude that the temp needs to stay below 95 degrees in order to use the rings as a measure. Thus, (A) is not an assumption upon which we really rely.

As you note, (A) is an appealing answer: It sure would be nice to know that there are not even more factors affecting the growth of rings. But there is a big difference between a nice-to-know assumption and an assumption-on-which-the-argument-depends. The GMAT always wants the latter!

Negate (E): The number of rings lost when temp exceeds 95 degrees IS predictable.
Result: We can no longer assert that the ONLY way to use the rings to reliably determine age is if the temps stay below 95. You are correct that we would need to know the complete temperature records and number of rings lost as a function of temp, but it would at least be possible to use the rings to determine age. The “only” in the conclusion is really the key word.
Intern
Joined: 17 Sep 2011
Posts: 28
Location: United States
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 2

Re: The popular notion that a tree's age can be determined by [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 May 2012, 01:50
at first was confused with A and E...
as
AThe growth of new rings in a tree is not a function of levels of precipitation.
B Only the Brazilian ash loses rings because of excessive heat. --not relevant...with conclusion..
C Only one day of temperatures above 95 degrees Fahrenheit is needed to cause the Brazilian ash to lose a ring. --again irrelevant....
D The internal rings of all trees are of uniform thickness. --out of scope...
E The number of rings that will be lost when the temperature exceeds 95 degrees Fahrenheit is not predictable.

but ..negation of E " The number of rings that will be lost when the temperature exceeds 95 degrees Fahrenheit is predictable." hurts the conclusion ..therefore i went with E...
Manager
Joined: 02 Jan 2011
Posts: 201
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 52 [1] , given: 22

Re: The popular notion that a tree's age can be determined by [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 May 2012, 06:49
1
KUDOS
The central point of the passage is to determine the age of the Brazilian ash trees.

Taking Option E - The number of rings that will be lost when the temperature exceeds 95 degrees Fahrenheit is not predictable

If we negate the above statement, we can rephrase it as follows:

The number of rings that will be lost when the temperature exceeds 95 degrees Fahrenheit is predictable.

Now if in a year, the temperature has exceeded 95 degrees, then we would know the number of rings the tree would lose before hand. If we would like to determine the age of the tree, then all we need to do is add the number of rings lost to the existing rings.

I hope my explanation makes sense. Would love to hear a different version which would help understand the problem in depth.
Intern
Joined: 07 May 2012
Posts: 9
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: The popular notion that a tree's age can be determined by [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Jun 2012, 08:08
I was between A and E. E is more specific and A is really covering a whole lot more than I would like the answer to be. So I chose E. :D
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10529
Followers: 918

Kudos [?]: 203 [0], given: 0

Re: The popular notion that a tree's age can be determined by [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Feb 2015, 21:40
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10529
Followers: 918

Kudos [?]: 203 [0], given: 0

Re: The popular notion that a tree's age can be determined by [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Apr 2016, 04:32
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Intern
Joined: 13 Jul 2015
Posts: 5
Location: India
Concentration: International Business, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: Q50 V
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 53

Re: The popular notion that a tree's age can be determined by [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Jul 2016, 12:50
IMO,

A. The growth of new rings in a tree is not a function of levels of precipitation. : Seems irrelevant
B. Only the Brazilian ash loses rings because of excessive heat. : irrelevant. We don't care about other things losing anything because of excessive heat.
C. Only one day of temperatures above 95 degrees Fahrenheit is needed to cause the Brazilian ash to lose a ring: irrelevant. As no information about the time that is
needed to cause the Brazilian ash to lose a ring.
D. The internal rings of all trees are of uniform thickness. : irrelevant
E. The number of rings that will be lost when the temperature exceeds 95 degrees Fahrenheit is not predictable
Manager
Joined: 24 Oct 2013
Posts: 132
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 122

Re: The popular notion that a tree's age can be determined by [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Aug 2016, 01:24
Conclusion: we can correctly determine age of brazelian tree only if its temperature doent exceed 95

E. The number of rings that will be lost when the temperature exceeds 95 degrees Fahrenheit is not predictable : this states why relaying on the
rings doent determine the age

I go with E
Re: The popular notion that a tree's age can be determined by   [#permalink] 10 Aug 2016, 01:24

Go to page   Previous    1   2   [ 40 posts ]

Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
3 CR Revision: The popular notion that a tree’s age can be determined by 3 31 Jan 2016, 23:03
13 A tree's age can be determined by counting the 8 05 Apr 2015, 07:15
Assumption Revision: The popular notion that a tree’s age 3 22 Feb 2015, 20:25
2 The popular belief that a snake's age can be determined by 3 19 Feb 2013, 12:21
14 The popular notion that a tree s age can be determined by 17 24 Nov 2011, 00:53
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# The popular notion that a tree's age can be determined by

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.