Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 22 Oct 2014, 04:17

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

The problem that environmental economics aims to remedy is

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 29 Jul 2006
Posts: 877
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 0

The problem that environmental economics aims to remedy is [#permalink] New post 16 Apr 2007, 22:02
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
The problem that environmental economics aims to remedy is the following: people making economic decisions cannot readily compare environmental factors, such as clean air and the survival of endangered species, with other costs and benefits. As environmental economists recognize, solving this problem requires assigning monetary values to environmental factors. But monetary values result from people comparing costs and benefits in order to arrive at economic decisions. Thus, environmental economics is stymied by what motivates it.

If the considerations advanced in its support are true, the passage’s conclusion is supported
(A) strongly, on the assumption that monetary values for environment factors cannot be assigned unless people make economic decisions about these factors
(B) strongly, unless economic decision-making has not yet had any effect on the things categorized as environmental factors
(C) at best weakly, because the passage fails to establish that economic decision-makers do not by and large take adequate account of environmental factors
(D) at best weakly, because the argument assumes that pollution and other effects on environmental factors rarely result from economic decision-making
(E) not at all, since the argument is circular, taking that conclusion as one of its premises
VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 15 Jul 2004
Posts: 1474
Schools: Wharton (R2 - submitted); HBS (R2 - submitted); IIMA (admitted for 1 year PGPX)
Followers: 15

Kudos [?]: 102 [0], given: 13

 [#permalink] New post 17 Apr 2007, 01:31
WHat a mess...

Economic decisions – requires monetary comparison – monetary comparisons require assigning monetary values – monetary values result from comparisons to make economic decisions.

It looks like E.. circular reasoning.. but I am not sure.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 02 Jan 2007
Posts: 211
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 18 Apr 2007, 13:00
I'll go with (B). It says

unless economic decision-making has not yet had any effect on the things categorized as environmental factors

so for the conclusion to be supported,
economic decision-making should not have had any effect on the things categorized as environmental factors.

I'll go with this.
Current Student
avatar
Joined: 28 Dec 2004
Posts: 3403
Location: New York City
Schools: Wharton'11 HBS'12
Followers: 13

Kudos [?]: 164 [0], given: 2

 [#permalink] New post 18 Apr 2007, 13:36
I will go with B too..
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 26 Feb 2007
Posts: 115
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 18 Apr 2007, 14:47
A.
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 03 Apr 2007
Posts: 1377
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 194 [0], given: 10

Reviews Badge
 [#permalink] New post 18 Apr 2007, 16:10
Premise1 :solving this problem requires assigning monetary values to environmental factors.
Premise 2: But monetary values result from people comparing costs and benefits in order to arrive at economic decisions.
Conclusion:Thus, environmental economics is stymied by what motivates it.

Question: What supports the conclusion?
Attitude of the people to think on monetary terms.


B!
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 23 Jun 2005
Posts: 847
GMAT 1: 740 Q48 V42
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 25 [0], given: 1

 [#permalink] New post 19 Apr 2007, 08:33
Wow :roll: :shock:
Couldn't make sense at all of this one... seems like an E to me.

Anand
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 29 Jul 2006
Posts: 877
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 19 Apr 2007, 09:32
Only ng got it right...but can u tell me whats wrong with E ng??
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 01 Feb 2005
Posts: 274
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 1

 [#permalink] New post 19 Apr 2007, 09:33
I thought E too!!

This is how I solved the question... Would like to know the OA

compare environmental factors (A)
costs and benefits (B)
monetary values (C)

The problem is that - A cannot be compared with B
To solve problem - A should be assigned C
But C can be obtained by B

So we are kind of back to square one
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 23 Mar 2007
Posts: 177
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 19 Apr 2007, 09:57
I am totally confused but putting my 2 cents on A as it only makes some sense in the context of the question.
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 03 Apr 2007
Posts: 1377
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 194 [0], given: 10

Reviews Badge
Re: CR-environmental economics [#permalink] New post 20 Apr 2007, 10:15
vineetgupta wrote:
The problem that environmental economics aims to remedy is the following: people making economic decisions cannot readily compare environmental factors, such as clean air and the survival of endangered species, with other costs and benefits. As environmental economists recognize, solving this problem requires assigning monetary values to environmental factors. But monetary values result from people comparing costs and benefits in order to arrive at economic decisions. Thus, environmental economics is stymied by what motivates it.

If the considerations advanced in its support are true, the passageтАЩs conclusion is supported
(A) strongly, on the assumption that monetary values for environment factors cannot be assigned unless people make economic decisions about these factors
(B) strongly, unless economic decision-making has not yet had any effect on the things categorized as environmental factors
(C) at best weakly, because the passage fails to establish that economic decision-makers do not by and large take adequate account of environmental factors
(D) at best weakly, because the argument assumes that pollution and other effects on environmental factors rarely result from economic decision-making
(E) not at all, since the argument is circular, taking that conclusion as one of its premises


Pls post the OA.
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 29 Jul 2006
Posts: 877
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 20 Apr 2007, 10:36
The OA is A...can anyone explain??
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 26 Feb 2007
Posts: 115
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 20 Apr 2007, 12:04
The problem that environmental economics aims to remedy is the following: people making economic decisions cannot readily compare environmental factors, such as clean air and the survival of endangered species, with other costs and benefits. As environmental economists recognize, solving this problem requires assigning monetary values to environmental factors. But monetary values result from people comparing costs and benefits in order to arrive at economic decisions. Thus, environmental economics is stymied by what motivates it.

Goal: The problem that environmental economics aims to remedy: People making economic decisions cannot readily compare environmental factors, such as clean air and the survival of endangered species, with other costs and benefits



Explananation: Environmental economists recognize, solving this problem requires assigning monetary values to environmental factors



Counter Premise: Monetary values result from people comparing costs and benefits in order to arrive at economic decisions



Conclusion: Environmental economics is stymied by what motivates it.

The question is asking us to provide support i.e. which of the following is best supports the conclusion тАШenvironmental economics is stymied by what motivates itтАЩ

With that said lets look at the options:-
(A) Strongly, on the assumption that monetary values for environment factors cannot be assigned unless people make economic decisions about these factors

Yes!
Even if you use formal logic this holds true

(B) Strongly, unless economic decision-making has not yet had any effect on the things categorized as environmental factors (Unrelated and out of Scope)

(C) At best weakly, because the passage fails to establish that economic decision-makers do not by and large take adequate account of environmental factors

(Nothing has been said about these)

(D) at best weakly, because the argument assumes that pollution and other effects on environmental factors rarely result from economic decision-making
(Out of Scope)

(E) not at all, since the argument is circular, taking that conclusion as one of its premises
We are not asked to critique the argument, we are asked to provide support (out)
  [#permalink] 20 Apr 2007, 12:04
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
1 According to a study concerning environmental economics, any Bull78 1 05 Sep 2012, 12:41
18 The solution to any environmental problem that is not the vjsharma25 20 11 Mar 2011, 08:43
Many people think that the only way to remedy the problem of rockubabe 3 22 May 2010, 14:33
The problem that environmental economics aims to remedy is vineetgupta 3 18 Apr 2007, 00:02
The problem that environmental economics aims to remedy is WinWinMBA 4 19 Jun 2005, 18:15
Display posts from previous: Sort by

The problem that environmental economics aims to remedy is

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.