Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 19 Oct 2014, 20:59

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

The proper way to plan for a scientific project is first to

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
CEO
CEO
avatar
Joined: 15 Aug 2003
Posts: 3470
Followers: 60

Kudos [?]: 674 [0], given: 781

The proper way to plan for a scientific project is first to [#permalink] New post 05 Oct 2003, 00:05
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

20% (02:53) correct 80% (01:17) wrong based on 6 sessions
21. The proper way to plan for a scientific project is first to decide its goal and then to plan the best way to accomplish that goal. Th U.S space station project does not conform to this ideal. when the cold war ended , the project lost its original purpose , so another purpose was quickly grafted onto the project, that of conducting linited gravity experiments, even though such experiments can be done in an alternative way. It is , therefore ,abundantly clear that the space station should not be built.

The reasoning in this argument is flawed because the argument

A. Attacks the proponents of a claim rather than arguing against the claim itself

B. Presupposes what it sets out to prove

C. Faults planners for not foreseeing a certain event, when in fact that event was not foreseeable

D. Contains statements that lead to a self contradiction

E. Concludes that a shortcoming is fatal, having produced evidence only of the existence of that shortcoming

Last edited by Praetorian on 05 Oct 2003, 11:53, edited 1 time in total.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 13 Aug 2003
Posts: 68
Location: India
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 05 Oct 2003, 01:04
another tough one but still would go with C . Asuumption being that cold war end couldnt have been forseeable by the planners. let me know the answer.
CEO
CEO
avatar
Joined: 15 Aug 2003
Posts: 3470
Followers: 60

Kudos [?]: 674 [0], given: 781

 [#permalink] New post 05 Oct 2003, 11:17
AkamaiBrah wrote:
IMO the answer is E.


can you please explain

how does "fatal" come into the picture??

thanks
praetorian
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 23 Dec 2002
Posts: 13
Location: LA
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 05 Oct 2003, 11:47
I would say the answer is A. This seems to be the best answer, although I am not sure why attacking a proponent of the claim doesn't translate into attacking the claim itself.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 23 Dec 2002
Posts: 13
Location: LA
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 05 Oct 2003, 11:48
I would say the answer is A. This seems to be the best answer, although I am not sure why attacking a proponent of the claim doesn't translate into attacking the claim itself.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 12 Sep 2003
Posts: 31
Location: Peru
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 05 Oct 2003, 16:17
Why not D?
I disagree with the "fatal" thing
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 21 Aug 2003
Posts: 258
Location: Bangalore
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 05 Oct 2003, 20:52
IMHO answer: E
argument says that project is proper if it first set its goal and then accomplishes it in the best way.
Author concludes that Sapce sattion is failure. Why?
Because it went about achieving its goal, that of conducting linited gravity experiments, even though other alternatives were available.
So author argues that since project does't conform to the second guideline of a proper project it should not be carried out/stopped altogther.
E - clearly states this line of reasoning of author: he points out a shortcoming, gives evidence for that but concludes that it is serious/fatal..!!
thanks
VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 15 Jul 2004
Posts: 1474
Schools: Wharton (R2 - submitted); HBS (R2 - submitted); IIMA (admitted for 1 year PGPX)
Followers: 15

Kudos [?]: 102 [0], given: 13

Re: CR : Space Station [#permalink] New post 13 Jul 2010, 03:41
Pretty neat question... give it a crack...
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Posts: 172
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 24 [0], given: 1

Re: CR : Space Station [#permalink] New post 13 Jul 2010, 05:31
E . Author is making big fuss about a small thing. Jus that another alternative "such experiments can be done in an alternative way" exists. Also we don know which alernative is better .
_________________


R E S P E C T


Finally KISSedGMAT 700 times 450 to 700 An exprience

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 10 Feb 2008
Posts: 90
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 2

Reviews Badge
Re: CR : Space Station [#permalink] New post 13 Jul 2010, 12:41
go with E
whats the OA?
_________________

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Amar
http://amarnaik.wordpress.com

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 09 Jul 2010
Posts: 150
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 3

Re: CR : Space Station [#permalink] New post 17 Jul 2010, 03:58
KissGMAT wrote:
E . Author is making big fuss about a small thing. Jus that another alternative "such experiments can be done in an alternative way" exists. Also we don know which alernative is better .


E
_________________

consider cudos if you like my post

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 05 Jun 2010
Posts: 4
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

Re: CR : Space Station [#permalink] New post 17 Jul 2010, 04:40
I would go with B.

Because the argument presupposes about how scientific projects should be planned and then on that basis gives judgement on why the space shuttle should not be built
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 23 May 2010
Posts: 443
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 34 [0], given: 112

Re: CR : Space Station [#permalink] New post 18 Jul 2010, 00:47
E
Re: CR : Space Station   [#permalink] 18 Jul 2010, 00:47
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
6 The Academia Sectrorum Naturae, the first scientific veenu08 10 27 Aug 2013, 20:09
The proper way to plan a scientific project is first to noboru 6 03 Jun 2010, 10:06
The proper way to plan for a scientific project is first to AK47 5 28 Jan 2007, 23:39
The proper way to plan a scientific project is first to sonfbm 5 17 Nov 2005, 06:19
The proper way to plan a scientific project is first to saurya_s 12 27 Feb 2005, 17:58
Display posts from previous: Sort by

The proper way to plan for a scientific project is first to

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.