The proper way to plan for a scientific project is first to : GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR)
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 18 Jan 2017, 22:01

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

The proper way to plan for a scientific project is first to

Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Senior Manager
Joined: 05 Oct 2006
Posts: 267
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 17 [0], given: 0

The proper way to plan for a scientific project is first to [#permalink]

Show Tags

28 Jan 2007, 23:39
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

The proper way to plan for a scientific project is first to decide its goal and then to plan the best way to accomplish that goal. Th U.S space station project does not conform to this ideal. when the cold war ended , the project lost its original purpose , so another purpose was quickly grafted onto the project, that of conducting linited gravity experiments, even though such experiments can be done in an alternative way. It is , therefore ,abundantly clear that the space station should not be built.

The reasoning in this argument is flawed because the argument

A. Attacks the proponents of a claim rather than arguing against the claim itself

B. Presupposes what it sets out to prove

C. Faults planners for not foreseeing a certain event, when in fact that event was not foreseeable

E. Concludes that a shortcoming is fatal, having produced evidence only of the existence of that shortcoming
If you have any questions
New!
Director
Affiliations: FRM Charter holder
Joined: 02 Dec 2006
Posts: 734
Schools: Stanford, Chicago Booth, Babson College
Followers: 16

Kudos [?]: 79 [0], given: 4

Show Tags

29 Jan 2007, 02:06
AK47 wrote:
The proper way to plan for a scientific project is first to decide its goal and then to plan the best way to accomplish that goal. Th U.S space station project does not conform to this ideal. when the cold war ended , the project lost its original purpose , so another purpose was quickly grafted onto the project, that of conducting linited gravity experiments, even though such experiments can be done in an alternative way. It is , therefore ,abundantly clear that the space station should not be built.

The reasoning in this argument is flawed because the argument

A. Attacks the proponents of a claim rather than arguing against the claim itself

B. Presupposes what it sets out to prove

C. Faults planners for not foreseeing a certain event, when in fact that event was not foreseeable

E. Concludes that a shortcoming is fatal, having produced evidence only of the existence of that shortcoming

I would go for D. Because, the argument says that "US space station planners should plan the best way to accomplish that goal". But the argument only says that "such experiments can be done in an alternative way". Alternative way is not the best way. Still the argument says that "abundantly clear that the space station should not be built". Dont you see some contradiction here??
Director
Joined: 24 Aug 2006
Posts: 751
Location: Dallas, Texas
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 145 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

31 Jan 2007, 22:49
E !

"project lost its original purpose , so another purpose was quickly grafted onto the project" is the short coming and argument assumes this short coming is fatal.
_________________

"Education is what remains when one has forgotten everything he learned in school."

Director
Affiliations: FRM Charter holder
Joined: 02 Dec 2006
Posts: 734
Schools: Stanford, Chicago Booth, Babson College
Followers: 16

Kudos [?]: 79 [0], given: 4

Show Tags

01 Feb 2007, 02:56
Swagatalakshmi wrote:
E !

"project lost its original purpose , so another purpose was quickly grafted onto the project" is the short coming and argument assumes this short coming is fatal.

Your explanation is convincing. But I am still not fully clear why D is wrong.
Manager
Joined: 14 Oct 2005
Posts: 65
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 56 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

01 Feb 2007, 11:59
Swagatalakshmi wrote:
E !

"project lost its original purpose , so another purpose was quickly grafted onto the project" is the short coming and argument assumes this short coming is fatal.

Agree with the reasoning above.
Senior Manager
Joined: 05 Oct 2006
Posts: 267
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 17 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

02 Feb 2007, 05:39
aurobindo,

it's not clear if the alternate way is better or not.so you can not "definitely" say that the statement leads to self contradiction.hence.choice D can be eliminated.

OA is E.
Re: cr-proper way   [#permalink] 02 Feb 2007, 05:39
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
2 An electronics company plans to lure first-time buyers ... 3 14 Oct 2013, 07:25
1 The proper way to plan a scientific project is first to 6 03 Jun 2010, 10:06
Not convinced with OA :B ].Need proper explanation as to why 2 09 Oct 2009, 15:46
The true scientific significance of a group of unusual 5 01 May 2007, 21:51
Scientific research will be properly channeled whenever 10 11 Feb 2007, 12:42
Display posts from previous: Sort by