Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 24 Oct 2014, 10:46

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

The proposal to extend clinical trials, which are routinely

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 30 Oct 2003
Posts: 1798
Location: NewJersey USA
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 36 [0], given: 0

The proposal to extend clinical trials, which are routinely [#permalink] New post 04 Jan 2004, 19:39
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
19. The proposal to extend clinical trials, which are routinely used as systematic tests of pharmaceutical innovations, to new surgical procedures should not be implemented. The point is that surgical procedures differ in one important respect from medicinal drugs: a correctly prescribed drug depends for its effectiveness only on the drug's composition, whereas the effectiveness of even the most appropriate surgical procedure is transparently related to the skills of the surgeon who uses it.

The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument

(A) does not consider that new surgical procedures might be found to be intrinsically more harmful than the best treatment previously available

(B) ignores the possibility that the challenged proposal is deliberately crude in a way designed to elicit criticism to be used in relining the proposal

(C) assumes that a surgeon's skills remain unchanged throughout the surgeon's professional life

(D) describes a dissimilarity without citing any scientific evidence for the existence of that dissimilarity

(E) rejects a proposal presumably advanced in good faith without acknowledging any such good faith .
CEO
CEO
avatar
Joined: 15 Aug 2003
Posts: 3470
Followers: 60

Kudos [?]: 675 [0], given: 781

Re: CR - New surgical procedures [#permalink] New post 04 Jan 2004, 21:03
anandnk wrote:
19. The proposal to extend clinical trials, which are routinely used as systematic tests of pharmaceutical innovations, to new surgical procedures should not be implemented. The point is that surgical procedures differ in one important respect from medicinal drugs: a correctly prescribed drug depends for its effectiveness only on the drug's composition, whereas the effectiveness of even the most appropriate surgical procedure is transparently related to the skills of the surgeon who uses it.

The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument

(A) does not consider that new surgical procedures might be found to be intrinsically more harmful than the best treatment previously available

(B) ignores the possibility that the challenged proposal is deliberately crude in a way designed to elicit criticism to be used in relining the proposal

(C) assumes that a surgeon's skills remain unchanged throughout the surgeon's professional life

(D) describes a dissimilarity without citing any scientific evidence for the existence of that dissimilarity

(E) rejects a proposal presumably advanced in good faith without acknowledging any such good faith .


A is best.

surgical procedures may have inherent risks which are not dependent of the skill of the surgeon
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 30 Oct 2003
Posts: 1798
Location: NewJersey USA
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 36 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 04 Jan 2004, 21:54
The answer is A. I am sure Geethu will come with a great explaination.

I chose C. Here is my logic

The argument talks about the new surgical method. If surgeon's skill does not remain same then even the old surgeries will have different results. Since old surgical methods are still employed ( I assumed it )and successfull the dependency on the variation of surgeons skill is minimal. The argument assumes too much about the surgeon's skill.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 05 May 2003
Posts: 427
Location: Aus
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 05 Jan 2004, 07:40
As per my understanding.

The argument says clinical trials should not be extended to surgical procedures as they depend on the surgeons skills which can not be measured like the drug composition. But A says there could be other better treatments than surgery. In this case the surgeons are to be blamed irrespective of their skills.
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 30 Oct 2003
Posts: 1798
Location: NewJersey USA
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 36 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 05 Jan 2004, 07:52
Hi Geethu,

Authors holds surgeon's skill as an important factor in the effectivemess of the new surgical procedure. We have to prove that authors reasoning is flawed. We either show that surgeon's skill does not matter very much or the new surgical method are better than any existing treatment. I dont understand how A brings out the flaw in the authors reasoning.

Now I am begining to think that C and A are almost same.

Please explain further by disecting the argument and what is expected.

Thanks in advance.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 05 May 2003
Posts: 427
Location: Aus
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

Re: CR - New surgical procedures [#permalink] New post 05 Jan 2004, 08:10
praetorian123 wrote:
anandnk wrote:
19. The proposal to extend clinical trials, which are routinely used as systematic tests of pharmaceutical innovations, to new surgical procedures should not be implemented. The point is that surgical procedures differ in one important respect from medicinal drugs: a correctly prescribed drug depends for its effectiveness only on the drug's composition, whereas the effectiveness of even the most appropriate surgical procedure is transparently related to the skills of the surgeon who uses it.

The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument

(A) does not consider that new surgical procedures might be found to be intrinsically more harmful than the best treatment previously available

(B) ignores the possibility that the challenged proposal is deliberately crude in a way designed to elicit criticism to be used in relining the proposal

(C) assumes that a surgeon's skills remain unchanged throughout the surgeon's professional life

(D) describes a dissimilarity without citing any scientific evidence for the existence of that dissimilarity

(E) rejects a proposal presumably advanced in good faith without acknowledging any such good faith .


A is best.

surgical procedures may have inherent risks which are not dependent of the skill of the surgeon


praeto, why don't you explain it further. :lol:
Re: CR - New surgical procedures   [#permalink] 05 Jan 2004, 08:10
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
12 Experts publish their posts in the topic Editorial: In a compelling preponderance of clinical trials, avohden 19 01 Nov 2013, 12:23
The proposal to extend clinical trials, which are routinely noboru 3 04 Jun 2010, 04:35
The proposal to extend clinical trials, which are routinely vineetgupta 15 06 Apr 2007, 01:58
The proposal to extend clinical trials, which are routinely WinWinMBA 13 16 Jun 2005, 15:46
The proposal to extend clinical trials, which are routinely saurya_s 13 01 Mar 2005, 09:20
Display posts from previous: Sort by

The proposal to extend clinical trials, which are routinely

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.