Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 23 Jul 2014, 01:56

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

The proposal to hire ten new police officers in Middletown

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
2 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 26 Jan 2008
Posts: 26
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 3 [2] , given: 0

The proposal to hire ten new police officers in Middletown [#permalink] New post 07 Sep 2008, 06:53
2
This post received
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  35% (medium)

Question Stats:

48% (01:52) correct 52% (00:53) wrong based on 101 sessions
The proposal to hire ten new police officers in Middletown is quite foolish. There is sufficient funding to pay the salaries of the new officers, but not the salaries of additional court and prison employees to process the increased caseload of arrests and convictions that new officers usually generate. Which of the following, if true, will most seriously weaken the conclusion drawn above?
a. Studies had shown that an increase in city’s place force does not necessarily reduce crime
b. When one major city increased its police force by 19% last year, there were 40% more arrests and 13% more convictions
c. If funding for the new police officers’ salaries is approved, support for other city services will have to be reduced during the next fiscal year
d. In most US cities, not all arrests result in convictions, and not all convictions result in prison terms
e. Middletown’s ratio of police officers to citizens has reached a level at which an increase in the number of officers will have a deterrent effect on crime
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Last edited by Narenn on 10 Jul 2013, 06:03, edited 1 time in total.
OA Added
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 06 Apr 2008
Posts: 452
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 40 [0], given: 1

Re: CR- hiring new police officers question [#permalink] New post 07 Sep 2008, 07:03
ttwang56 wrote:
The proposal to hire ten new police officers in Middletown is quite foolish. There is sufficient funding to pay the salaries of the new officers, but not the salaries of additional court and prison employees to process the increased caseload of arrests and convictions that new officers usually generate. Which of the following, if true, will most seriously weaken the conclusion drawn above?
a. Studies had shown that an increase in city’s place force does not necessarily reduce crime
b. When one major city increased its police force by 19% last year, there were 40% more arrests and 13% more convictions
c. If funding for the new police officers’ salaries is approved, support for other city services will have to be reduced during the next fiscal year
d. In most US cities, not all arrests result in convictions, and not all convictions result in prison terms
e. Middletown’s ratio of police officers to citizens has reached a level at which an increase in the number of officers will have a deterrent effect on crime


IMO E)

If crime will be less then number of convictions/arrests will be less as well
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 26 Jan 2008
Posts: 26
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

Re: CR- hiring new police officers question [#permalink] New post 07 Sep 2008, 14:43
doesn't that support the argument though?
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 20 Sep 2006
Posts: 658
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 59 [0], given: 7

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR- hiring new police officers question [#permalink] New post 07 Sep 2008, 19:55
ttwang56 wrote:
doesn't that support the argument though?



Nope ... Its is weakening the argument here the flow:

More police --> Less Crime --> less arrests --> Less employes in court and prison to process the caseload of arrests. hence the proposal is not bad et all.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 22 Jul 2011
Posts: 27
Location: United States
Concentration: General Management, Leadership
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V37
GMAT 2: 710 Q49 V37
WE: Project Management (Computer Software)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 2

Reviews Badge
The proposal to hire ten new police officers in Middletown [#permalink] New post 28 Jul 2011, 21:25
170. The proposal to hire ten new police officers in Middletown is quite foolish. There is sufficient funding to pay the salaries of the new officers, but not the salaries of additional court and prison employees to process the increased caseload of arrests and convictions that new officers usually generate.
Which of the following, if true, will most seriously weaken the conclusion drawn above?
(A) Studies have shown that an increase in a city’s police force does not necessarily reduce crime.
(B) When one major city increased its police force by 19 percent last year, there were 40 percent more arrests and 13 percent more convictions.
(C) If funding for the new police officers’ salaries is approved, support for other city services will have to be reduced during the next fiscal year.
(D) In most United States cities, not all arrests result in convictions, and not all convictions result in prison terms.
(E) Middletown’s ratio of police officers to citizens has reached a level at which an increase in the number of officers will have a deterrent effect on crime.
Director
Director
User avatar
Status:
Joined: 24 Jul 2011
Posts: 547
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V48
GRE 1: 1540 Q800 V740
Followers: 60

Kudos [?]: 261 [0], given: 11

Re: Critical reasoning from OG10 [#permalink] New post 28 Jul 2011, 21:38
The answer is (E).

(A): If crime is not reduced, it will add to arrests, convictions, and prison terms - this strengthens the conclusion. Incorrect.
(B): There is no relation between what happenned in another city and what will happen in this one. Incorrect.
(C): No relation to arrests, convictions, and prison terms. Incorrect.
(D): Even if some arrests result in prison terms, convictions etc, this still increases the workload for additional court and prison employees.
(E): CORRECT. If the increase in police officers has a deterrent effect on crime, then crime will actually go down => additional court and prison employees are not needed because the workload of prison and court employees actually goes down.

_________________

GyanOne | http://www.GyanOne.com | +91 9899831738

Get a free detailed MBA profile evaluation

Top MBA Rankings and MBA Admissions blog


Image

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 02 Nov 2009
Posts: 21
Schools: ISB
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 2

Re: Critical reasoning from OG10 [#permalink] New post 29 Jul 2011, 05:10
Agree that the answer is E . Gyanone already explained the reasons .
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 24 Jun 2011
Posts: 58
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 6

Re: Critical reasoning from OG10 [#permalink] New post 29 Jul 2011, 05:39
between D and E, E is better
Director
Director
avatar
Status: Prep started for the n-th time
Joined: 29 Aug 2010
Posts: 708
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 93 [0], given: 37

GMAT Tests User
Re: Critical reasoning from OG10 [#permalink] New post 29 Jul 2011, 06:13
+ 1 for E.

Crick
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 01 Dec 2008
Posts: 64
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 2

Re: Critical reasoning from OG10 [#permalink] New post 29 Jul 2011, 10:04
Yep straight answer E
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Status: Dream big, work hard, and drink gallons of beer!
Joined: 11 Jun 2011
Posts: 213
Concentration: Finance, General Management
GMAT Date: 10-01-2011
WE: Web Development (Consulting)
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 33

Re: Critical reasoning from OG10 [#permalink] New post 29 Jul 2011, 11:00
E is Right. If crime is reduced, salaries for addition court and prison employees are not needed, so the decision to hire new officers is not really foolish.

_________________

If I look absent-minded or insane, I am just living a dream of being successful. If you still wonder why I am like this, you have no idea how success tastes like!

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 18 Sep 2009
Posts: 374
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 44 [0], given: 2

GMAT Tests User
The proposal to hire ten new police officers in Middletown [#permalink] New post 28 Feb 2012, 12:46
The proposal to hire ten new police officers in Middletown is quite foolish. There is sufficient funding to pay the salaries of the new officers, but not the salaries of additional court and prison employees to process the increased caseload of arrests and convictions that new officers usually generate. Which of the following, if true, will most seriously weaken the conclusion drawn above?
a. Studies had shown that an increase in city’s place force does not necessarily reduce crime
b. When one major city increased its police force by 19% last year, there were 40% more arrests and 13% more convictions
c. If funding for the new police officers’ salaries is approved, support for other city services will have to be reduced during the next fiscal year
d. In most US cities, not all arrests result in convictions, and not all convictions result in prison terms
e. Middletown’s ratio of police officers to citizens has reached a level at which an increase in the number of officers will have a deterrent effect on crime

can anybody explain option A. I cannot ruled out this option
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 22 Feb 2012
Posts: 93
Schools: HBS '16
GMAT 1: 740 Q49 V42
GMAT 2: 670 Q42 V40
GPA: 3.47
WE: Corporate Finance (Aerospace and Defense)
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 19 [0], given: 25

GMAT ToolKit User GMAT Tests User
Re: police officer [#permalink] New post 28 Feb 2012, 12:59
a. Studies had shown that an increase in city’s place force does not necessarily reduce crime
This seems to strengthen the case that hiring additional police officers is foolish but for a different reason
b. When one major city increased its police force by 19% last year, there were 40% more arrests and 13% more convictions
The case of one city is irrelevant

c. If funding for the new police officers’ salaries is approved, support for other city services will have to be reduced during the next fiscal year

Not relevant to the conclusion

d. In most US cities, not all arrests result in convictions, and not all convictions result in prison terms
I had thought this was best - however you could make the argument that it is not explicitly stated that Middletown is a US city

e. Middletown’s ratio of police officers to citizens has reached a level at which an increase in the number of officers will have a deterrent effect on crime
This is making the case that hiring the officers is foolish for a different reason than stated


Would be interested in hearing other peoples ideas on this:

For me the conclusion is: Hiring 10 policemen is foolish because the city cannot afford to hire the support staff to process additional arrests that hiring the addl policemen would be making.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 29 Jun 2011
Posts: 165
WE 1: Information Technology(Retail)
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 29

Re: police officer [#permalink] New post 29 Feb 2012, 10:40
IMO D,

Premise:
1.Sufficient salary to pay for New Officers only.
2. New officers generate more arrests & convictions.
2.No salary to pay additional court and prison employees to process the increased caseload of arrests and convictions.

Conclusion:
The proposal to hire ten new police officers in Middletown is quite foolish.

Weaken:
In most US cities, not all arrests result in convictions, and not all convictions result in prison terms.

Am i missing something?? not sure why OA is E.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 18 Sep 2009
Posts: 374
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 44 [0], given: 2

GMAT Tests User
Re: police officer [#permalink] New post 01 Mar 2012, 07:42
for sure D is not the answer as the argument never told that Middletown is in united states may be it is in India or Germany. we dont know. can anybody explain option A.

I did not understand the AbeinOhio reasoning for A. what is the different reason. Can you explain little bit clearly
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 22 Feb 2012
Posts: 93
Schools: HBS '16
GMAT 1: 740 Q49 V42
GMAT 2: 670 Q42 V40
GPA: 3.47
WE: Corporate Finance (Aerospace and Defense)
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 19 [0], given: 25

GMAT ToolKit User GMAT Tests User
Re: police officer [#permalink] New post 01 Mar 2012, 08:19
The proposal to hire ten new police officers in Middletown is quite foolish I believe this is the key conclusion


Studies had shown that an increase in city’s police force does not necessarily reduce crime - this is actually strengthening the conclusion - i say for a different reason - because the supporting reason provided in the argument is that they are unable to hire the needed support staff...
Verbal Forum Moderator
Verbal Forum Moderator
User avatar
Status: Flying over the cloud!
Joined: 16 Aug 2011
Posts: 795
Location: Viet Nam
Concentration: International Business, Marketing
Schools: Duke '16
GMAT Date: 06-06-2014
GPA: 3.07
Followers: 32

Kudos [?]: 156 [0], given: 40

GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member CAT Tests
Re: police officer [#permalink] New post 01 Mar 2012, 21:58
TomB wrote:
The proposal to hire ten new police officers in Middletown is quite foolish. There is sufficient funding to pay the salaries of the new officers, but not the salaries of additional court and prison employees to process the increased caseload of arrests and convictions that new officers usually generate. Which of the following, if true, will most seriously weaken the conclusion drawn above?
a. Studies had shown that an increase in city’s place force does not necessarily reduce crime
e. Middletown’s ratio of police officers to citizens has reached a level at which an increase in the number of officers will have a deterrent effect on crime

can anybody explain option A. I cannot ruled out this option


Choice A strengthen the argument instead of weakening the argument because it states that increase police force will not reduce crime, so not effective. This proposal is foolish.

In other hand. choice E states that the proposal will enable the crime status to be better. This choice the best answer.

_________________

Rules for posting in verbal gmat forum, read it before posting anything in verbal forum
Giving me + 1 kudos if my post is valuable with you :)

The more you like my post, the more you share to other's need

CR: Focus of the Week: Must be True Question

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 18 Sep 2009
Posts: 374
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 44 [0], given: 2

GMAT Tests User
Re: police officer [#permalink] New post 02 Mar 2012, 15:14
I got it, thanks. need to focus on conlcusion
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 31 Aug 2011
Posts: 209
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 43 [0], given: 44

CAT Tests
The proposal to hire ten new police officers in Middletown [#permalink] New post 14 Aug 2012, 23:21
The proposal to hire ten new police officers in Middletown is quite foolish. There is sufficient funding to pay the salaries of the new officers, but not the salaries of additional court and prison employees to process the increased caseload of arrests and convictions that new officers usually generate.
Which of the following, if true, will most seriously weaken the conclusion drawn above?
(A) Studies have shown that an increase in a city’s police force does not necessarily reduce crime.
(B) When one major city increased its police force by 19 percent last year, there were 40 percent more arrests and 13 percent more convictions.
(C) If funding for the new police officers’ salaries is approved, support for other city services will have to be reduced during the next fiscal year.
(D) In most United States cities, not all arrests result in convictions, and not all convictions result in prison terms.
(E) Middletown’s ratio of police officers to citizens has reached a level at which an increase in the number of officers will have a deterrent effect on crime.

_________________

If you found my contribution helpful, please click the +1 Kudos button on the left, I kinda need some =)

Director
Director
User avatar
Status: Final Countdown
Joined: 17 Mar 2010
Posts: 564
Location: India
GPA: 3.82
WE: Account Management (Retail Banking)
Followers: 11

Kudos [?]: 122 [0], given: 75

Re: The proposal to hire ten new police officers in Middletown i [#permalink] New post 15 Aug 2012, 02:42

_________________

" Make more efforts "
Press Kudos if you liked my post

Re: The proposal to hire ten new police officers in Middletown i   [#permalink] 15 Aug 2012, 02:42
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
The proposal to hire ten new police officers in Middletown nikhil.jones.s 0 10 Jul 2013, 03:24
The proposal to hire ten new police officers in Middletown techyrajeev 0 29 Jul 2011, 11:00
The proposal to hire ten new police officers in Middletown RyanDe680 7 09 May 2008, 18:39
The proposal to hire ten new police officers in Middletown sperinko 12 20 Aug 2006, 06:08
The proposal to hire ten new police officers in Middletown qhoc0010 3 23 Dec 2004, 07:12
Display posts from previous: Sort by

The proposal to hire ten new police officers in Middletown

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 23 posts ] 



cron

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.