Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 15 Apr 2014, 20:41

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

The protection of the right of property by the Constitutions

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 24 Aug 2012
Posts: 129
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 32 [1] , given: 2

Reviews Badge
The protection of the right of property by the Constitutions [#permalink] New post 21 Oct 2012, 14:16
1
This post received
KUDOS
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  5% (low)

Question Stats:

84% (01:52) correct 15% (01:30) wrong based on 19 sessions
The protection of the right of property by the Constitutions is tenuous at best. It is true that the Fifth Amendment states that the Government may not take private property for public use without compensation, but it is the government that defines private property.

Which of the following is most likely the point the author is leading up to?

A. Individual rights that are protected by the Supreme Court are secure against government encroachment.
B. Private property is neither more nor less than that which the government says is private property.
C. The government has no authority to deprive an individual of his liberty.
D. No government that acts arbitrarily can be justified.
E. The keystone of American democracy is the Constitution.
_________________

Push +1 kudos button please, if you like my post

Moderator
Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 02 Jul 2012
Posts: 1206
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy
GMAT 1: 740 Q49 V42
GPA: 3.8
WE: Engineering (Energy and Utilities)
Followers: 52

Kudos [?]: 560 [0], given: 109

GMAT Tests User Premium Member
Re: The protection of the right of property by the Constitutions [#permalink] New post 21 Oct 2012, 22:48
Tough one indeed. Stuck between B & C. Will go with B as the words stay closer to the argument.
_________________

Did you find this post helpful?... Please let me know through the Kudos button.

Thanks To The Almighty - My GMAT Debrief

GMAT Reading Comprehension: 7 Most Common Passage Types

Intern
Intern
Joined: 12 Jun 2012
Posts: 42
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 17 [0], given: 28

Re: The protection of the right of property by the Constitutions [#permalink] New post 22 Oct 2012, 06:02
The protection of the right of property by the Constitutions is tenuous at best. It is true that the Fifth Amendment states that the Government may not take private property for public use without compensation, but it is the government that defines private property.

Crux of the argument is saying that the govt can make up the rules as it goes along

A. Individual rights that are protected by the Supreme Court are secure against government encroachment - OOS
B. Private property is neither more nor less than that which the government says is private property - Looks good as the article says that the govt defines what it cannot take so therefore it has the freedom to take whatever it wantsC. The government has no authority to deprive an individual of his liberty. OOS
D. No government that acts arbitrarily can be justified. The prose inplies a govt that acts arbitrarily but doesn't comment on this point
E. The keystone of American democracy is the Constitution. OOS
_________________

If you find my post helpful, please GIVE ME SOME KUDOS!

Director
Director
Joined: 03 Aug 2012
Posts: 691
Concentration: General Management, General Management
GMAT 1: 630 Q47 V29
GPA: 3.7
Followers: 10

Kudos [?]: 92 [0], given: 229

Premium Member
Re: The protection of the right of property by the Constitutions [#permalink] New post 16 Jan 2013, 23:07
Can anyone elaborate on this one.

Rgds,
Saurabh
_________________

_____________________________________________________________________________
I Assisted You => KUDOS Please
Race Starts again
VeritasPrep 700
GMATPrep#1 650
GMATPrep#2 710

_____________________________________________________________________________

Intern
Intern
Joined: 17 Jan 2013
Posts: 7
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: -25 [0], given: 1

Re: The protection of the right of property by the Constitutions [#permalink] New post 17 Jan 2013, 12:33
The protection of the right of property by the Constitutions is tenuous at best. It is true that the Fifth Amendment states that the Government may not take private property for public use without compensation, but it is the government that defines private property.

Which of the following is most likely the point the author is leading up to?


First thing to realize is to identify what is the question type. If you are not able to categorize, there is a high probability that you may end up choosing the wrong answer.

So this question falls under "Logically Complete the Passage" . Once you have determined the category, you know how GMAT may play and makes a wrong answer.
The author is sarcastic in his/her argument and is looking for a fact that will validate his/her claim. So look out for fact that will support his/her claim that the protection of the right of property by the Constitutions is tenuous at best.
What will make his conclusion strong or strengthen it.
the protection of the right of property by the Constitutions is tenuous at best. is the conclusion of the author.

It is true that the Fifth Amendment states that the Government may not take private property for public use without compensation is a counter argument, which author only uses to defend his argument from attack. But the author has not given any premise on which his conclusion is based.

So we expect author to mention a premise which will justify or support his claim.


A. Individual rights that are protected by the Supreme Court are secure against government encroachment. --- Yes, but this will weaken the author's conclusion and we need something that will strengthen his claim.
B. Private property is neither more nor less than that which the government says is private property. --- hmnnn... finally author mention something to defend his claim that the protection of the right of property by the Constitutions is tenuous at best --- Right Answer
C. The government has no authority to deprive an individual of his liberty. --- this is fact, but it only supports counter argument, this does not support author's conclusion.
D. No government that acts arbitrarily can be justified. --- This is an opinion, we are not looking for opinion. We are looking for a premise that support the author's conclusion
E. The keystone of American democracy is the Constitution. --- This is a fact, but does not support authors claim that
the protection of the right of property by the Constitutions is tenuous at best
VP
VP
User avatar
Status: I'm back and not stopping until I hit 760+
Joined: 06 Sep 2013
Posts: 1321
Location: United States
Concentration: Finance, General Management
Schools: Wharton '17
GPA: 3.5
WE: Corporate Finance (Investment Banking)
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 86 [0], given: 169

GMAT ToolKit User CAT Tests
Re: The protection of the right of property by the Constitutions [#permalink] New post 14 Dec 2013, 12:56
kingb wrote:
The protection of the right of property by the Constitutions is tenuous at best. It is true that the Fifth Amendment states that the Government may not take private property for public use without compensation, but it is the government that defines private property.

Which of the following is most likely the point the author is leading up to?

A. Individual rights that are protected by the Supreme Court are secure against government encroachment.
B. Private property is neither more nor less than that which the government says is private property.
C. The government has no authority to deprive an individual of his liberty.
D. No government that acts arbitrarily can be justified.
E. The keystone of American democracy is the Constitution.


I'll go with B too

Cheers!
J :)
Re: The protection of the right of property by the Constitutions   [#permalink] 14 Dec 2013, 12:56
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Popular new posts Guess which one is right Property taxes are typically set at nick_sun 10 04 Apr 2007, 05:32
Popular new posts Intellectual property laws protect patent holders from anin 12 09 Jul 2010, 11:06
New posts 7 Experts publish their posts in the topic What kinds of property rights apply to Algonquian family AN225 8 20 Apr 2011, 12:20
New posts 5 What constitutes $, $$, or $$$? dman25 3 01 Mar 2013, 16:41
New posts 1 According to the Constitution kingb 4 01 Mar 2014, 07:28
Display posts from previous: Sort by

The protection of the right of property by the Constitutions

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.