Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 28 Jul 2015, 12:37
GMAT Club Tests

Alert:

RAGCT Week 1 Winners announced here


Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

The public in the United States has in the past been

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 10 Jan 2010
Posts: 117
GPA: 4
WE: Programming (Computer Software)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 73 [1] , given: 33

The public in the United States has in the past been [#permalink] New post 12 Jan 2012, 19:37
1
This post received
KUDOS
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  55% (hard)

Question Stats:

58% (02:28) correct 42% (01:29) wrong based on 98 sessions
The public in the United States has in the past been conditioned to support a substantial defense budget by the threat of confrontation with the Eastern bloc. Now that that threat is dissolving, along with the Eastern bloc itself, it is doubtful whether the public can be persuaded to support an adequate defense budget.
Which one of the following indicates a weakness in the position expressed above?
(A) It presupposes that public opinion can be manipulated indefinitely, without the public’s becoming aware of that manipulation.
(B) It refers to past and present events that do not have a causal connection with public support of the budget.
(C) It assumes as fact what it seeks to establish by reasoning.
(D) It fails to give any reason for the judgment it reaches.
(E) It hinges on the term “adequate,” the precise meaning of which requires reevaluation in the new context.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

-If you like my post, consider giving KUDOS

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 28 Jul 2011
Posts: 566
Location: United States
Concentration: International Business, General Management
GPA: 3.86
WE: Accounting (Commercial Banking)
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 96 [0], given: 16

Re: Flaw in the reasoning [#permalink] New post 13 Jan 2012, 02:39
+1 E
_________________

+1 Kudos If found helpful..

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 10 Jan 2010
Posts: 117
GPA: 4
WE: Programming (Computer Software)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 73 [0], given: 33

Re: Flaw in the reasoning [#permalink] New post 15 Jan 2012, 08:01
Posting the answer never helps anybody. Please post your reasoning behind it.
_________________

-If you like my post, consider giving KUDOS

Retired Moderator
User avatar
Status: 2000 posts! I don't know whether I should feel great or sad about it! LOL
Joined: 04 Oct 2009
Posts: 1720
Location: Peru
Schools: Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, MIT & HKS (Government)
WE 1: Economic research
WE 2: Banking
WE 3: Government: Foreign Trade and SMEs
Followers: 79

Kudos [?]: 482 [0], given: 109

Re: Flaw in the reasoning [#permalink] New post 15 Jan 2012, 15:23
+1 E
_________________

"Life’s battle doesn’t always go to stronger or faster men; but sooner or later the man who wins is the one who thinks he can."

My Integrated Reasoning Logbook / Diary: my-ir-logbook-diary-133264.html

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Expert Post
2 KUDOS received
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
User avatar
Joined: 28 Nov 2011
Posts: 307
Followers: 383

Kudos [?]: 621 [2] , given: 2

Re: Flaw in the reasoning [#permalink] New post 16 Jan 2012, 11:15
2
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
First off, I think it is important to note that the “flavor” of this question is slightly different from what you’ll see on the GMAT. Notice that the answer choices speak very abstractly about the prompt.

For instance, (C) and (D) challenge the argument at a general level, alluding to anything specific in the prompt. It turns out that the answer (E), only references two words from the entire prompt. That is not to say this question is unhelpful – you must still use critical reasoning skills.


(A) INCORRECT The word ‘condition’ suggests that the ‘public’s opinion’ is being manipulated. However, the prompt mentions that “it is doubtful whether the public can be persuaded,” which implies that the public cannot be manipulated/conditioned in its opinion of defense budget spending.
(B) INCORRECT The past and present events, which refers to the diminished threat from the Eastern bloc, does have a causal connection.
(C) INCORRECT The argument seeks to prove that is doubtful whether the public will support an adequate budget. The argument states that “it is doubtful”, showing that it does not assume as fact that the public will not support adequate spending on defense.
(D) INCORRECT The argument clearly gives a reason for the public’s unwillingness to support defense spending – diminished threat from the Eastern bloc.
(E) CORRECT The prompt argues the threat from the Eastern bloc led to the public’s support of a substantial defense budget. With the threat gone, the public is no longer willing to support an adequate defense budget.

Notice how the argument switches out ‘substantial’ and ‘adequate.’ The two words are very different, so it does not follow that if the public is unwilling to spend, say 10 billion a year (a substantial amount) on a defense budget, that it is unwilling to spend two billion (an adequate amount).

The wording “reevaluation in a new context” refers to the change in threat from the Eastern bloc.

_________________

Christopher Lele
Magoosh Test Prep


Image

Image

GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 4578
Followers: 489

Kudos [?]: 100 [0], given: 0

Premium Member
Re: The public in the United States has in the past been [#permalink] New post 02 Jan 2015, 00:25
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Re: The public in the United States has in the past been   [#permalink] 02 Jan 2015, 00:25
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Since 1975 there has been in the United States a dra- matic tejal777 3 09 Jun 2009, 04:59
Since 1975 there has been in the United States a dramatic VAGMAT 9 23 Apr 2007, 13:41
In the past year, there has been a large drop in the number sperinko 9 06 Aug 2006, 15:07
In the past year, there has been a large drop in the number sgrover 9 15 Jun 2006, 19:07
In the past year, there has been a large drop in the number nakib77 4 14 Oct 2005, 12:34
Display posts from previous: Sort by

The public in the United States has in the past been

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.