Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 16 Sep 2014, 15:31

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

The purpose of the proposed law requiring a doctor's

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 12 Oct 2008
Posts: 558
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 67 [0], given: 2

GMAT Tests User
The purpose of the proposed law requiring a doctor's [#permalink] New post 21 Jan 2009, 15:10
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

75% (02:10) correct 25% (02:25) wrong based on 2 sessions
The purpose of the proposed law requiring a doctor's prescription for obtaining hypodermic needles is to lower the incidence of drug-related deaths, both accidental and intentional, involving hypodermic needles. But even knitting needles can be lethal if they fall into the wrong hands; yet everyone would agree that imposing legal restrictions on obtaining knitting needles would be preposterous. Hence the proposed law involving hypodermic makes no sense and should not be enacted.

Which of the following, if true, would provide most support for the
argument above?

(A) Knitting needles have been known to cause injury
and death.
(B) The benefits of hypodermic needles outweigh those
of knitting needles.
(C) The proposed law would not deter the sort of activity
known to result in drug-related deaths.
(D) The proposed law could not be effectively enforced.
(E) Knitting needles are not readily available to anybody
who wants to obtain them.

A
Kaplan GMAT Prep Discount CodesKnewton GMAT Discount CodesGMAT Pill GMAT Discount Codes
1 KUDOS received
SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 04 May 2006
Posts: 1941
Schools: CBS, Kellogg
Followers: 17

Kudos [?]: 282 [1] , given: 1

Premium Member CAT Tests
Re: CR: Knitting needles [#permalink] New post 21 Jan 2009, 21:00
1
This post received
KUDOS
reply2spg wrote:
The purpose of the proposed law requiring a doctor's prescription for obtaining hypodermic needles is to lower the incidence of drug-related deaths, both accidental and intentional, involving hypodermic needles. But even knitting needles can be lethal if they fall into the wrong hands; yet everyone would agree that imposing legal restrictions on obtaining knitting needles would be preposterous. Hence the proposed law involving hypodermic makes no sense and should not be enacted.

Which of the following, if true, would provide most support for the
argument above?

(A) Knitting needles have been known to cause injury
and death.
(B) The benefits of hypodermic needles outweigh those
of knitting needles.
(C) The proposed law would not deter the sort of activity
known to result in drug-related deaths.
(D) The proposed law could not be effectively enforced.
(E) Knitting needles are not readily available to anybody
who wants to obtain them.

A


1. the argument focuses on WHY the proposed law makes no sense and should not be enacted rather than compares the benifits of kinds of needles, so B is IRRELEVANT, B out

2. C very subtle, but C out. Although the law WOULD NOT deter many activities that result in deaths, C CANNOT suggest that the law WOULD deter knitting needles (which is assumed to be the cause of drug-related deaths).

3. The effectiveness of the law does not mean that the law making no sense, so D cannot help explain why the law should not be enacted. D out

4. E suggests that knitting needles available to amost every persons. That is, the proposed law must make sense. E weakens rather than strenthens the argument, E out

A is the best
_________________

Get the best GMAT Prep Resources with GMAT Club Premium Membership

1 KUDOS received
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 02 Nov 2008
Posts: 283
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 31 [1] , given: 2

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR: Knitting needles [#permalink] New post 22 Jan 2009, 15:28
1
This post received
KUDOS
bigfernhead wrote:
Wow, great question (and tricky) I actually went with D on this one.

The conclusion is this: Hence the proposed law involving hypodermic makes no sense and should not be enacted.

We need to strengthen the conclusion.

(A) Knitting needles have been known to cause injury and death -
This doesn't explain why the law makes no sense.

(D) The proposed law could not be effectively enforced.
The assumption in the argument is that knitting needles are like hypodermic needles in that they are both readily available.

Thus, you can't ask doctors' for prescriptions because it's hard to enforce. You can't enforce knitting needles either. Therefore, the law makes no sense because both of these things can't be enforced.



In all honesty I think this is a really stupid question.
1 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 10 Nov 2007
Posts: 14
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 7 [1] , given: 0

Re: CR: Knitting needles [#permalink] New post 22 Jan 2009, 17:20
1
This post received
KUDOS
bigfernhead wrote:
Wow, great question (and tricky) I actually went with D on this one.

The conclusion is this: Hence the proposed law involving hypodermic makes no sense and should not be enacted.

We need to strengthen the conclusion.

(A) Knitting needles have been known to cause injury and death -
This doesn't explain why the law makes no sense.

(D) The proposed law could not be effectively enforced.
The assumption in the argument is that knitting needles are like hypodermic needles in that they are both readily available.

Thus, you can't ask doctors' for prescriptions because it's hard to enforce. You can't enforce knitting needles either. Therefore, the law makes no sense because both of these things can't be enforced.


Completely agree! I went with D too. And my explanation was exactly the same.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 02 Nov 2008
Posts: 283
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 31 [0], given: 2

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR: Knitting needles [#permalink] New post 21 Jan 2009, 15:22
Is it C?

Last edited by chicagocubsrule on 21 Jan 2009, 22:01, edited 2 times in total.
SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 17 Jun 2008
Posts: 1579
Followers: 12

Kudos [?]: 183 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR: Knitting needles [#permalink] New post 21 Jan 2009, 21:29
agree with A.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 02 Nov 2008
Posts: 283
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 31 [0], given: 2

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR: Knitting needles [#permalink] New post 21 Jan 2009, 22:01
What's the OA?
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 23 May 2008
Posts: 428
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 75 [0], given: 14

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR: Knitting needles [#permalink] New post 21 Jan 2009, 23:07
I'll go with C
Retired Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 18 Jul 2008
Posts: 997
Followers: 8

Kudos [?]: 71 [0], given: 5

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR: Knitting needles [#permalink] New post 22 Jan 2009, 14:36
Wow, great question (and tricky) I actually went with D on this one.

The conclusion is this: Hence the proposed law involving hypodermic makes no sense and should not be enacted.

We need to strengthen the conclusion.

(A) Knitting needles have been known to cause injury and death -
This doesn't explain why the law makes no sense.

(D) The proposed law could not be effectively enforced.
The assumption in the argument is that knitting needles are like hypodermic needles in that they are both readily available.

Thus, you can't ask doctors' for prescriptions because it's hard to enforce. You can't enforce knitting needles either. Therefore, the law makes no sense because both of these things can't be enforced.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 10 Nov 2007
Posts: 14
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

Re: CR: Knitting needles [#permalink] New post 22 Jan 2009, 17:24
scthakur wrote:
agree with A.


A does nothing with hypodermic ones!
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 01 Aug 2008
Posts: 770
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 95 [0], given: 99

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR: Knitting needles [#permalink] New post 22 Jan 2009, 17:47
IMO C.. not sure why A is wrong though .. :)
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 18 May 2008
Posts: 1300
Followers: 12

Kudos [?]: 114 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR: Knitting needles [#permalink] New post 23 Jan 2009, 03:07
It shld be C. If the law does nothing 2 stop wrong activities, then there is no use in implementing it. Hence C
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 12 Oct 2008
Posts: 558
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 67 [0], given: 2

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR: Knitting needles [#permalink] New post 24 Jan 2009, 08:29
OA A
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 18 May 2008
Posts: 1300
Followers: 12

Kudos [?]: 114 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR: Knitting needles [#permalink] New post 24 Jan 2009, 08:50
A?????????????????How?
reply2spg wrote:
OA A
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 12 Oct 2008
Posts: 558
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 67 [0], given: 2

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR: Knitting needles [#permalink] New post 24 Jan 2009, 09:14
you need to support the argument and argument is "Hence the proposed law involving hypodermic makes no sense and should not be enacted"....to support this you have to show that Knitting needles are harmful as much as hypodermic needles....A shows it clearly....therefore A. make sense?
ritula wrote:
A?????????????????How?
reply2spg wrote:
OA A
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 18 May 2008
Posts: 1300
Followers: 12

Kudos [?]: 114 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR: Knitting needles [#permalink] New post 24 Jan 2009, 20:11
If knitting needles r as harmful,then this does not mean restictions shld nt be imposed on hypodermic.Althogh this may lead 2 additional restrcitions on knitting needles as well.
Somehow, im not coinvinced with the OA and OE. Can sum1 explain this?
reply2spg wrote:
you need to support the argument and argument is "Hence the proposed law involving hypodermic makes no sense and should not be enacted"....to support this you have to show that Knitting needles are harmful as much as hypodermic needles....A shows it clearly....therefore A. make sense?
ritula wrote:
A?????????????????How?
reply2spg wrote:
OA A
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 05 Jul 2008
Posts: 1436
Followers: 33

Kudos [?]: 215 [0], given: 1

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR: Knitting needles [#permalink] New post 29 Jan 2009, 10:38
I dont get it. How is A correct?

Proposed law makes no sense and it should not be enacted is the conclusion

proposed law's purpose is to stop accidental and intentional deaths caused by HN and not by KN. KN is used as an example to show that deaths can also be caused by them. pick the needle, which ever, death is a possibility. In essence needles are just the conduit and the root cause is some thing else.

So if proposed law does not deter the activity that is the root cause of deaths, there is no point in enacting the law.

i got C.
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 1894
Followers: 259

Kudos [?]: 58 [0], given: 0

Premium Member
Re: The purpose of the proposed law requiring a doctor's [#permalink] New post 19 Jun 2014, 05:07
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 10 Mar 2013
Posts: 200
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 1737

CAT Tests
Re: The purpose of the proposed law requiring a doctor's [#permalink] New post 19 Jun 2014, 05:11
This is from GMAT Pill, and the OA according to Zeke is A. However, I competely disagree, because A doesn't even affect the argument. I chose C, because it clearly shows that the law would not meet its goal of reducing the misuse of the needles.
Re: The purpose of the proposed law requiring a doctor's   [#permalink] 19 Jun 2014, 05:11
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
2 Experts publish their posts in the topic A law is being proposed that would require the installation MOKSH 3 10 Jan 2013, 21:42
3 Experts publish their posts in the topic A law is being proposed that would require the installation sajini 11 17 Sep 2012, 04:35
2 A proposed law in State Q requires that all applicants bschool83 13 14 Aug 2011, 06:29
The state legislature has proposed a law that would require agdimple333 8 06 Jul 2011, 09:27
The state legislature has proposed a law that would require suntaurian 6 02 Mar 2008, 20:38
Display posts from previous: Sort by

The purpose of the proposed law requiring a doctor's

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.