Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

The ratio of cupcakes to children at a particular birthday [#permalink]
22 Jul 2007, 15:13

The ratio of cupcakes to children at a particular birthday party is 104 to 7. Each chiled at the birthday party eats exactly x cupcakes (where x is a positive integer) and the adults attending the birthday paraty do not ear anything. If the number of cupcakes that remain uneaten is less than the number of children at the birthday party, what must be true about the number of uneaten cupcakes?

I. It is a multiple of 2.
II. It is a multiple of 3.
III. It is a multiple of 7.

Pick which applies.

I do not know how to approach this question thanks.

Not exactly. If there were 7 children, the cupcakes would be 728.
If each child ate 14 we would have 630 left, which is more than 7!!
I think we need less than 728-7 to be consumed or 722.
Number left-6. In this case I and II stand.

Hayabusa, I think you missed the part of the problem where it said that the ratio is 104 cupcakes per every 7 children. Not 104 cupcakes per child (talk about a sugar rush!)

I think I know where ioiio was trying to go with that. If you divide 104 by 7, you get that each child would get a minimum of ~14.85 cupcakes, or 14 whole cupcakes (assuming that there is a minimum of 7 children and 104 cupcakes).

Then, if you multiply the 14 whole cupcakes by the 7 children you come up with 98 whole cupcakes, meaning that you'd have 6 leftover cupcakes. So, by this logic, since 2 (I.) and 3 (II.) are both multiples of 6, then I and II would be true. I have no idea if this would hold true if there were more children.

I have absolutely no idea if this is right, or even in the right ballpark. Is the OA available?

Hayabusa, I think you missed the part of the problem where it said that the ratio is 104 cupcakes per every 7 children. Not 104 cupcakes per child (talk about a sugar rush!)

I think I know where ioiio was trying to go with that. If you divide 104 by 7, you get that each child would get a minimum of ~14.85 cupcakes, or 14 whole cupcakes (assuming that there is a minimum of 7 children and 104 cupcakes).

Then, if you multiply the 14 whole cupcakes by the 7 children you come up with 98 whole cupcakes, meaning that you'd have 6 leftover cupcakes. So, by this logic, since 2 (I.) and 3 (II.) are both multiples of 6, then I and II would be true. I have no idea if this would hold true if there were more children.

I have absolutely no idea if this is right, or even in the right ballpark. Is the OA available?

I agree that it's I and II, for the same reasoning - that 104/7=14, r6. If 104:7 is the ratio, the remainder would always be a multiple of 6. (208/14=14, r12, 312/21=14,r18 etc....)

Hayabusa, I think you missed the part of the problem where it said that the ratio is 104 cupcakes per every 7 children. Not 104 cupcakes per child (talk about a sugar rush!)

I think I know where ioiio was trying to go with that. If you divide 104 by 7, you get that each child would get a minimum of ~14.85 cupcakes, or 14 whole cupcakes (assuming that there is a minimum of 7 children and 104 cupcakes).

Then, if you multiply the 14 whole cupcakes by the 7 children you come up with 98 whole cupcakes, meaning that you'd have 6 leftover cupcakes. So, by this logic, since 2 (I.) and 3 (II.) are both multiples of 6, then I and II would be true. I have no idea if this would hold true if there were more children.

I have absolutely no idea if this is right, or even in the right ballpark. Is the OA available?

Sorry Guyz. I dont get to check the forums at work. Yeah! you were right about how I got that solution.

I should have explained better. I have been solving these GMAT problems for all of two days now. I am yet to get used to the jargon used here and sometimes have no clue whether any of my ramblings make sense to others or not

It’s been a long time, since I posted. A busy schedule at office and the GMAT preparation, fully tied up with all my free hours. Anyways, now I’m back...

One of the main strengths of Rotman comes from its diversity and when we speak of diversity, we mean it in terms of class distribution and the number of...