The reasons for yesterday's sharp rise in the stock market were much the same as that
behind last week's rally: a surge in the economy to a 5.6% annual growth rate and improved corporate earnings balanced by the lack of signs of inflationary pressure.
Not parallel. The intended meaning is that "the reasons (plural
) for X were much the same as "those" (the reasons
) behind Y.
The reasons || those ("those" refers to "the reasons")
C. what wasWrong.
"the reasons for X" and "what was
behind Y" are not parallel.
D. for thatWrong.
- "for" is redundant. The correct structure is: the reasons (plural) for X were much the same as
those behind Y
- "that" <== singular. Wrong.
E. they wereWrong.
- Pronoun problem: if you use "they", you repeat the same subject
"the reasons for yesterday's sharp rise in the stock market" <== That's wrong, because "the reasons for X" and "the reasons behind Y" are different
. (You only use "they" if you repeat the same
- Parallelism problem: "The reasons for X
" and "they were
" are not parallel. Technically, the noun phrases before and after "were much the same" - comparative phrase - must parallel.
Hope it helps.
Please +1 KUDO if my post helps. Thank you.
"Designing cars consumes you; it has a hold on your spirit which is incredibly powerful. It's not something you can do part time, you have do it with all your heart and soul or you're going to get it wrong."
Chris Bangle - Former BMV Chief of Design.