Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 18 Apr 2014, 23:11

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

The recent decline in the employment rate was spurred by

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
1 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
Joined: 29 Jul 2009
Posts: 226
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 33 [1] , given: 6

GMAT Tests User
The recent decline in the employment rate was spurred by [#permalink] New post 05 Dec 2009, 23:36
1
This post received
KUDOS
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  5% (low)

Question Stats:

100% (02:50) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 1 sessions
The recent decline in the employment rate was spurred by predictions of slow economic growth in the coming year. However, those predictions would not have affected the employment rate if it had not been for the lack of capital reserves of major industries. So if major industries increase their capital reserves, the employment rate will not decline in the future.

Which of the following, if true, casts the most doubt on the validity of the argument above?

A. Major industry foresaw the drop in employment.

B. Some major industries had appreciable capital reserves.

C. An increase in labor costs could adversely affect the employment rate.

D. The government could pass legislation mandating that major industries set aside a fixed amount as capital reserves every year.

E. The drop in the employment rate was more severe this year than last.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 02 Aug 2006
Posts: 119
Location: Mumbai
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 3

Re: Employment Rate [#permalink] New post 06 Dec 2009, 04:48
I am confused between B and C. I will prefer to choose C, since it mentions that that labor costs could also adversely impact employment rate.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 13 Nov 2009
Posts: 64
Schools: Columbia(RD-ding w/o int),
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

Re: Employment Rate [#permalink] New post 06 Dec 2009, 10:23
IMO, Answer is C.

C provides another reason why employment rates could be low in the future and thus weakens the argument.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 29 Jul 2009
Posts: 226
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 33 [0], given: 6

GMAT Tests User
Re: Employment Rate [#permalink] New post 07 Dec 2009, 07:29
OA is C.
Director
Director
Joined: 12 Oct 2008
Posts: 558
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 38 [0], given: 2

GMAT Tests User
Re: Employment Rate [#permalink] New post 03 Feb 2010, 18:51
What is wrong with B?
Manager
Manager
Joined: 26 Oct 2009
Posts: 55
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 25

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Employment Rate [#permalink] New post 03 Feb 2010, 19:30
C from me too.

Conclusion : the employment rate will not decline in the future.
Premise (among many) : major industries increase their capital reserves

So, there is a gap. Author is assuming that all that matters is the capital reserve. If we strike at that assumption that there may be other reasons as well affecting the Employement Rate, the conclusion will be weakened.

C does precisely that.

Now, B : Some major industries had appreciable capital reserves.
If *some* major industries had appreciable capital reserve how will it impact ? it does not impact on the assumption.
Director
Director
Joined: 12 Oct 2008
Posts: 558
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 38 [0], given: 2

GMAT Tests User
Re: Employment Rate [#permalink] New post 03 Feb 2010, 19:41
Got you, thanks!!!
vibhaj wrote:
C from me too.

Conclusion : the employment rate will not decline in the future.
Premise (among many) : major industries increase their capital reserves

So, there is a gap. Author is assuming that all that matters is the capital reserve. If we strike at that assumption that there may be other reasons as well affecting the Employement Rate, the conclusion will be weakened.

C does precisely that.

Now, B : Some major industries had appreciable capital reserves.
If *some* major industries had appreciable capital reserve how will it impact ? it does not impact on the assumption.


Posted from my mobile device Image
Re: Employment Rate   [#permalink] 03 Feb 2010, 19:41
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
New posts Based on the recent decline in enrollment, the admissions gmataquaguy 2 23 Jul 2005, 08:35
New posts The recent decline in the value of the dollar was triggered Riuscita 7 04 Apr 2006, 21:16
New posts The recent decline in the employment rate was spurred by Swagatalakshmi 8 26 Nov 2006, 19:31
New posts As a result of the continuing decline in the birth rate, goalsnr 6 18 Feb 2008, 18:43
New posts The recent decline in the employment rate was spurred by aaron22197 7 08 Jul 2008, 04:02
Display posts from previous: Sort by

The recent decline in the employment rate was spurred by

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.