The recent proliferation of newpaper articles in major : GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR)
Check GMAT Club App Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

It is currently 10 Dec 2016, 15:27
GMAT Club Tests

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

The recent proliferation of newpaper articles in major

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 09 Jul 2005
Posts: 595
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 56 [0], given: 0

The recent proliferation of newpaper articles in major [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Oct 2005, 13:38
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

The recent proliferation of newpaper articles in major publications that have been exposed as fabrications serves to bolster the contention that publishers are more interested in selling copy than in printing the truth. Even minor publications have staffs to check such obvious fraud.

The above argument assumes that

(A) newspaper stories of dubious authenticity are a new phenomenon.
(B) minor publications do a better job of fact-checking that do major publications.
(C) everything a newspaper prints must be factually verifiable.
(D) only recently have newspapers admintted to publishing erroneous stories.
(E) publishers are ultimately responsible for what is printed in their newspapers.

Please, leave your explaination. OA will follow
Request Expert Reply
If you have any questions
you can ask an expert
New!
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 28 May 2005
Posts: 1723
Location: Dhaka
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 320 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Oct 2005, 13:44
E is the only correct answer.

A. out of scope
B. out of scope
C. It can not be an assumption. because some facts might not neccessarily be varified
D. it is again not clear from the premise
E. publisher's are not the editors. so blaming the publishers for what has been printed assumes that publishers are ultimately responsible for what is printed in their newspapers.
Bingo! we found it.
_________________

hey ya......

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 21 Sep 2005
Posts: 235
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Oct 2005, 03:09
go E go...
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 14 Sep 2005
Posts: 993
Location: South Korea
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 153 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Oct 2005, 03:27
I pick (C).

Even minor publications have staffs to check such frauds (=factually verify). Therefore, major publications also have to do so.
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 15 Aug 2005
Posts: 798
Location: Singapore
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 51 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Oct 2005, 05:11
I pick E!
_________________

Cheers, Rahul.

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 29 Nov 2004
Posts: 484
Location: Chicago
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 25 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Oct 2005, 05:22
IMO E
_________________

Fear Mediocrity, Respect Ignorance

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 09 Nov 2004
Posts: 138
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Oct 2005, 05:56
B in my opinion, as it states the diff between small and large publications
_________________

Thanks!

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 03 Aug 2005
Posts: 134
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Oct 2005, 00:29
E for me
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
User avatar
Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Posts: 5062
Location: Singapore
Followers: 30

Kudos [?]: 349 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Oct 2005, 00:32
A - does not hold up conclusion
B - does not hold up conclusion
C - would be a good assumption. If everything a newspaper prints must be factually verifie, then there is no excuse for a major publication not to do so, especially since even small publications have staff to verify their stories. The conclusion that the major publications are more interested in boosting sale figures is therfore very strong.
D - irrelevant
E - does not hold up conclusion

C for me.
  [#permalink] 04 Oct 2005, 00:32
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
1 Columnist: In a recent article an economist argues tagmag 3 03 Jun 2016, 23:16
6 A recent series of newspaper articles revealed that shrive555 3 16 Dec 2010, 10:23
70 Experts publish their posts in the topic Recently, the research and development departments at major hemanthp 33 17 Oct 2010, 16:41
The authors of a recent article examined warnings of an eyunni 9 12 Nov 2007, 12:38
The recent proliferation of newspaper articles in major sludge 4 23 Jun 2007, 16:23
Display posts from previous: Sort by

The recent proliferation of newpaper articles in major

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.