Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 24 Oct 2014, 19:05

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

The recent upheaval in the office-equipment retail business,

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 25 Oct 2004
Posts: 250
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

The recent upheaval in the office-equipment retail business, [#permalink] New post 05 Mar 2005, 17:08
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
The recent upheaval in the office-equipment retail business, in which many small firms have gone out of business, has been attributed to the advent of office equipment “superstoresâ€
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 01 Feb 2003
Posts: 854
Location: Hyderabad
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 05 Mar 2005, 17:18
B

advertising of low prices has forced the prices down in the retail market..which directly supports the evidence in the argument
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 25 Nov 2004
Posts: 1497
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 31 [0], given: 0

Re: CR- office eqpmt [#permalink] New post 05 Mar 2005, 21:18
we need to show that the superstors control large portion of the market so that these store can keep the price down..

(A) strenghten the argument.

(B) The superstores’ heavy advertising of their low prices has forced prices down throughout the retail market for office supplies.......... it only weakens that the prices are not low.
(C) out of scope. irrelavant.
(D) Most of the office equipment superstores are owned by large retailing chains that also own stores selling other types of goods.. if these superstore are owned by the large retail chain, these super store control large portion/share of the market and this control reduces the prices. of the office equipment.
(E) also strenghten the argument.

Guys, what about D?
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 04 Jul 2004
Posts: 905
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 0

Re: CR- office eqpmt [#permalink] New post 05 Mar 2005, 21:53
MA wrote:
(D) Most of the office equipment superstores are owned by large retailing chains that also own stores selling other types of goods.. if these superstore are owned by the large retail chain, these super store control large portion/share of the market and this control reduces the prices. of the office equipment.


I think u r right.. I was looking for this kind of answer but could not understand the meaning of (D)
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 27 Jun 2004
Posts: 33
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 05 Mar 2005, 22:12
My choice would be D.

(A) Most of the larger customers for office equipment purchase under contract directly from manufacturers and thus do not participate in the retail market.
This cannot weaken the argument. It's more of an irrelevant detail.

(B) The superstores’ heavy advertising of their low prices has forced prices down throughout the retail market for office supplies.
Even if this is true, it explains the lower prices of the office equipment and does not refute the flawed analysis.

(C) Some of the superstores that only recently opened have themselves gone out of business.
Not useful to weaken the argument.

(D) Most of the office equipment superstores are owned by large retailing chains that also own stores selling other types of goods.
In this case, the large retailing chains hold a major portion of the office-equipment marketshare instead of the superstores which sell them, 'cos these chains own such stores. And since this results in superstores owning a large marketshare of office equipments, it readily results in lower prices of the same.


(E) The growing importance of computers in most offices has changed the kind of office equipment retailers must stock.
Nope. No impact on the argument.
VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 26 Apr 2004
Posts: 1226
Location: Taiwan
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 101 [0], given: 0

Re: CR- office eqpmt [#permalink] New post 05 Mar 2005, 23:26
[quote="swath20"]The recent upheaval in the office-equipment retail business, in which many small firms have gone out of business, has been attributed to the advent of office equipment “superstoresâ€
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 01 Feb 2003
Posts: 854
Location: Hyderabad
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 0

Re: CR- office eqpmt [#permalink] New post 05 Mar 2005, 23:35
[quote="swath20"]The recent upheaval in the office-equipment retail business, in which many small firms have gone out of business, has been attributed to the advent of office equipment “superstoresâ€
VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 26 Apr 2004
Posts: 1226
Location: Taiwan
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 101 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 08 Mar 2005, 01:08
OKOK, I changed my mind, it's D now.

Evidence: high sales volumn of the office equipment “superstoresâ€
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
User avatar
Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Posts: 5095
Location: Singapore
Followers: 19

Kudos [?]: 155 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 08 Mar 2005, 01:18
(A) Most of the larger customers for office equipment purchase under contract directly from manufacturers and thus do not participate in the retail market.
- does not explain why superstores forced the retail outlets to close

(B) The superstores’ heavy advertising of their low prices has forced prices down throughout the retail market for office supplies.
- If so, only the superstores could survive since they have a high sales volume. Samll firms which do not have such a high volume of sales can no longer compete.

(C) Some of the superstores that only recently opened have themselves gone out of business.
- only tells us superstores may not be always profitable to stay in business. It does not tells us why small firms go bust.

(D) Most of the office equipment superstores are owned by large retailing chains that also own stores selling other types of goods.
- tells us large retail chains also sell other types of goods. But does selling other products, (for instance, cars) affect the business of small retail business that deal only in office-equpiment ? No, it doesn't. We still do not have a valid reason why small firms are forced to go out of business even though superstores own only a small share of the retail market.

(E) The growing importance of computers in most offices has changed the kind of office equipment retailers must stock.
- Out of scope.

(B) it is.
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 21 Sep 2004
Posts: 619
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 08 Mar 2005, 06:38
B doesn't weaken the argument. it suggests why the prices went down where as
D weakens it .
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
User avatar
Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Posts: 5095
Location: Singapore
Followers: 19

Kudos [?]: 155 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 08 Mar 2005, 07:47
Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the argument that the analysis is flawed?

You are right. I did not read the question carefully :oops:

I've highlighted the parts which is important to answer the question. D would do nicely as it suggests the small retails went bust not because of competition from large superstores.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 25 Oct 2004
Posts: 250
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 08 Mar 2005, 08:14
Thanks guys for the explanations.

OA is B
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 03 Jan 2005
Posts: 2251
Followers: 12

Kudos [?]: 204 [0], given: 0

Re: CR- office eqpmt [#permalink] New post 08 Mar 2005, 09:12
Refuting argument: The upheaval in the office equipment retail business can be attributed to the superstores where prices are low and sales are high.
Argument: The analysis is wrong because the superstore's market share is very small. (If their mkt share is small then they should not have affected the entire business.)

Ask for weakening (for the argument, or support for the refuting argument).

(A) Most of the larger customers for office equipment purchase under contract directly from manufacturers and thus do not participate in the retail market.
This is irrelavent to the argument since the argument only concers retail market.

(B) The superstores’ heavy advertising of their low prices has forced prices down throughout the retail market for office supplies.
This should be the right answer. Their mkt share maybe small, but they have affected the entire industry with their low price.

(C) Some of the superstores that only recently opened have themselves gone out of business.
This doesn't not say anything much one way or the other.

(D) Most of the office equipment superstores are owned by large retailing chains that also own stores selling other types of goods.
What their owners sell in the other markets is irrelevant to the office equipment retail market.

(E) The growing importance of computers in most offices has changed the kind of office equipment retailers must stock.
Again irrelevant.
Re: CR- office eqpmt   [#permalink] 08 Mar 2005, 09:12
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
The recent upheaval in the office-equipment retail business, wudy 11 01 Apr 2007, 10:50
The recent upheaval in the office-equipment retail business, govinam 15 14 Sep 2006, 15:34
The recent upheaval in the office-equipment retail business, iced_tea 8 13 Jul 2006, 08:21
The recent upheaval in the office-equipment retail business, prude_sb 7 25 Apr 2006, 19:12
The recent upheaval in the office-equipment retail business, banerjeea_98 12 08 May 2005, 19:15
Display posts from previous: Sort by

The recent upheaval in the office-equipment retail business,

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.