Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 18 Sep 2014, 09:46

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

The recent upheaval in the office-equipment retail business,

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 20 May 2006
Posts: 97
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
The recent upheaval in the office-equipment retail business, [#permalink] New post 14 Sep 2006, 15:34
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
The recent upheaval in the office-equipment retail business, in which many small firms have gone out of business, has been attributed to the advent of office equipment “superstoresâ€
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 26 Mar 2006
Posts: 647
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 14 Sep 2006, 16:48
Will go for 'D'

The argument compares Office-equiment retailing with Generice Retailing and this is explained in 'D'
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 25 Jun 2006
Posts: 1176
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 41 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 14 Sep 2006, 18:06
i choose B.
Intern
Intern
User avatar
Joined: 22 Aug 2006
Posts: 10
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 14 Sep 2006, 18:43
Answer D is my choice.
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 17 Jul 2006
Posts: 716
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 14 Sep 2006, 18:54
My choice is D
VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 21 Mar 2006
Posts: 1136
Location: Bangalore
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 15 Sep 2006, 02:28
Between A and D.
I'll go for A.
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 21 Aug 2006
Posts: 1026
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 19 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 15 Sep 2006, 02:37
My answer is B.

Super stores advertised their low prices heavily. As a result customers started asking for similar prices from retailers. Large retailers could offer furniture at low price. Many smaller retailers could nt and went out of business. Even in that case, retailers might be having large market share.
_________________

The path is long, but self-surrender makes it short;
the way is difficult, but perfect trust makes it easy.

VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 02 Jun 2006
Posts: 1270
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 37 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 15 Sep 2006, 08:56
(B) The superstores’ heavy advertising of their low prices has forced prices down throughout the retail market for office supplies.

Although the superstores might control a small share, the prices may be affected due to their advertising low prices.

Answer: B
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 24 Aug 2006
Posts: 754
Location: Dallas, Texas
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 27 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 15 Sep 2006, 13:53
count my vote for (B) too
_________________

"Education is what remains when one has forgotten everything he learned in school."

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 22 May 2006
Posts: 71
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 16 Sep 2006, 10:09
B it is
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 16 Jul 2006
Posts: 6
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 17 Sep 2006, 08:42
ak_idc wrote:
My answer is B.

Super stores advertised their low prices heavily. As a result customers started asking for similar prices from retailers. Large retailers could offer furniture at low price. Many smaller retailers could nt and went out of business. Even in that case, retailers might be having large market share.


This does not prove that superstores control a large market share. Your statement "As a result customers started asking for similar prices from retailers" is an assumption.
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 02 Jun 2006
Posts: 1270
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 37 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 17 Sep 2006, 08:45
Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the argument that the analysis is flawed?

(B) The superstores’ heavy advertising of their low prices has forced prices down throughout the retail market for office supplies.


Don't the bold parts imply that his assumption is correct?

abba_rv wrote:
ak_idc wrote:
My answer is B.

Super stores advertised their low prices heavily. As a result customers started asking for similar prices from retailers. Large retailers could offer furniture at low price. Many smaller retailers could nt and went out of business. Even in that case, retailers might be having large market share.


This does not prove that superstores control a large market share. Your statement "As a result customers started asking for similar prices from retailers" is an assumption.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 23 Jul 2006
Posts: 50
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 17 Sep 2006, 12:35
Why not C???

Even new superstores have abandoned the market...it means the other superstores have control not a very small share of the retail market.
_________________

Woody crack the GMAT

Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 26 Mar 2006
Posts: 647
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 17 Sep 2006, 17:31
Facts
Upheaval in office-equipment retail business
Small firms have gone ouf business

ROOT CAUSE (as per the argument)
Superstores high sales volumes with low prices operating on a narrow profit margin

Above analysis is flawed as
superstores are still controlling a very small share of retail market.

Possible Inference - Superstores could chase out small retailers of office equipment but could not do the same for other small retailers. Hence their market share is quite small.

Question :- most weaken the claim that the analysis is flawed. In otherwords strenghthens the original argument.

(A) - Out of scope
(B) - Adds more to the facts.
(c) - Usage of some - ambiguous; not definite
(d) - out of scope. Talks about retail chains
(e) - Quite generic. Not relevant

Change my original stand from 'D' to 'B'

B seems to be the one.
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 21 Aug 2006
Posts: 1026
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 19 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 17 Sep 2006, 19:23
abba_rv wrote:
ak_idc wrote:
My answer is B.

Super stores advertised their low prices heavily. As a result customers started asking for similar prices from retailers. Large retailers could offer furniture at low price. Many smaller retailers could nt and went out of business. Even in that case, retailers might be having large market share.


This does not prove that superstores control a large market share. Your statement "As a result customers started asking for similar prices from retailers" is an assumption.


I never said that superstores control a large market share. I was just trying to explain how superstores' small market share, and their low price offerings go together.
_________________

The path is long, but self-surrender makes it short;
the way is difficult, but perfect trust makes it easy.

VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 25 Jun 2006
Posts: 1176
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 41 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 17 Sep 2006, 19:32
This is my analysis:

The flawed analysis blames on market share as the reason that small mum&pop stores have gone out of business. To weaken this argument, we just need another reason.

B presented that the heavily advertising of low prices could be another reason. so it weakened the market share claim. so, B is the answer.

C and D are too far from the argument itself.
  [#permalink] 17 Sep 2006, 19:32
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
The recent upheaval in the office-equipment retail business, wudy 11 01 Apr 2007, 10:50
The recent upheaval in the office-equipment retail business, iced_tea 8 13 Jul 2006, 08:21
The recent upheaval in the office-equipment retail business, prude_sb 7 25 Apr 2006, 19:12
The recent upheaval in the office-equipment retail business, banerjeea_98 12 08 May 2005, 19:15
The recent upheaval in the office-equipment retail business, swath20 12 05 Mar 2005, 17:08
Display posts from previous: Sort by

The recent upheaval in the office-equipment retail business,

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.