Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 28 Jul 2016, 06:27
GMAT Club Tests

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

The recycling of municipal solid waste is widely seen as an

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 17 Oct 2005
Posts: 932
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 172 [0], given: 0

The recycling of municipal solid waste is widely seen as an [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Nov 2005, 17:54
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

73% (02:03) correct 27% (01:24) wrong based on 35 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

The recycling of municipal solid waste is widely seen as an environmentally preferable alternative to the prevailing practices of incineration and of dumping in landfills. Recycling is profitable, as the recycling programs already in operation demonstrate. A state legislator proposes that communities should therefore be required to adopt recycling and to reach the target of recycling 50 percent of all solid waste within 5 years.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously calls into question the advisability of implementing the proposal?

A) Existing recycling programs have been voluntary, with citizens participation ranging from 30% in some communities to 80% in others.

B) Existing recycling programs have been restricted to that 20% of solid waste that, when reprocessed, can match processed raw materials in quality and price.

C) Existing recycling programs have had recurrent difficulties finding purchasers for their materials usually because of quantities too small to permit cost effective pickup and transportation.

D) Some of the materials that can be recycled are the very materials that, when incinerated, produce the least pollution

E) Many of the materials that cannot be recycled are also difficult to incinerate.
VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 22 Aug 2005
Posts: 1120
Location: CA
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 78 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Nov 2005, 18:23
B.

B finds loophole in the evidence :
Recycling is profitable, as the recycling programs already in operation demonstrate.

on basis of which legislator making decision.
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 13 Jun 2004
Posts: 1118
Location: London, UK
Schools: Tuck'08
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 38 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Nov 2005, 19:01
B too :wink:
_________________

Antoine

Tuck School of Business at Dartmouth
Tuck Alumni, Class of 2008

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 17 Oct 2005
Posts: 932
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 172 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Nov 2005, 20:33
can u guys further explain this one, im not sure i understand. thanks!
Intern
Intern
User avatar
Joined: 28 May 2005
Posts: 14
Location: Toronto
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Nov 2005, 20:33
B)
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 03 Jun 2005
Posts: 26
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

Re: The recycling ...CR [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Nov 2005, 23:19
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
[quote="joemama142000"]The recycling of municipal solid waste is widely seen as an environmentally preferable alternative to the prevailing practices of incineration and of dumping in landfills. Recycling is profitable, as the recycling programs already in operation demonstrate. A state legislator proposes that communities should therefore be required to adopt recycling and to reach the target of recycling 50 percent of all solid waste within 5 years.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously calls into question the advisability of implementing the proposal?

A) Existing recycling programs have been voluntary, with citizens participation ranging from 30% in some communities to 80% in others.

B) Existing recycling programs have been restricted to that 20% of solid waste that, when reprocessed, can match processed raw materials in quality and price.

C) Existing recycling programs have had recurrent difficulties finding purchasers for their materials usually because of quantities too small to permit cost effective pickup and transportation.

D) Some of the materials that can be recycled are the very materials that, when incinerated, produce the least pollution

E) Many of the materials that cannot be recycled are also difficult to incinerate.[/quote]
------
A-wrong-irrelevant. The fact that previous programs were voluntary doesn't expose a flaw in the proposal
B-Seems OK. The politician has 2 proposals. Adopt a program. Ensure 50% recycling. Both these are based on existing programs. If we can show that the nature of the existing programs is such that it calls into question the proposals, our job is done. A restriction of 20% has been put in for some reason and calls into question the 50% proposal. Also there is no evidence showing that these restrictions can be overcome in the next five years.
C-Wrong-This actually refutes the evidence that existing programs have proven profitable.
D-Wrong- Some? What about the others?
E-Irrelevant. We are not concerned with those that cannot be recycled/incinerated.
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 17 Oct 2005
Posts: 932
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 172 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Nov 2005, 23:41
Conclusion: Make recycling mandatory and to reach target of 50%

Evidence: cuz it is environmentally preferable and is profitable.

I chose C because it directly attacks the Evidence that recycling is not profitable. Wouldnt that weaken the conclusion by attacking the evidence?

I did not choose b cuz it was just weird at first glance.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 07 Jul 2005
Posts: 403
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 48 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Nov 2005, 00:34
a) Out of scope
b) Out of scope
c) Attacks the evidence saying that recycling is profitable
d) Pollution has nothing to do with the argument
e) Out of scope
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 07 Jul 2005
Posts: 403
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 48 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Nov 2005, 00:37
joemamma, do you have the OA?

I picked C as well, but I only because that was the best option. However, I did not like the option. Here is why: since the mayor is proposing to increase recycling to 50%, it would be a fair assumption that the problems faced in C will not exist anymore.

However, the other options weren't any better.
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 17 Oct 2005
Posts: 932
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 172 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Nov 2005, 00:48
Good point. i hear ya rigger. But the answer is B.
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 29 Aug 2005
Posts: 503
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Nov 2005, 01:55
I vote for B too.
Good one.
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 28 May 2005
Posts: 1723
Location: Dhaka
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 219 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Nov 2005, 13:34
I will try my luck with C.
I can not cancel out C.

What is the OA.
_________________

hey ya......

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 11 Mar 2016
Posts: 1
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: The recycling of municipal solid waste is widely seen as an [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 May 2016, 13:10
A: discussed about the recent recycling which is already positively effecting , Do we know what will happen in next 5 years . Can't say recycling is profitable or not.
B: discussed about 20% of solid waste which gives no benefit while compared with processed material.. Moreover we know nothing about the rest of 30% that upto 50% will it be profitable or not
C: quantity being so small that it does not allow cost effective method , rather can cost more every time...so that way recycling might be costly than other methods----- weakens
D: incineration is better for some materials ..what about others ..can't say anything
E: can't judge which one is better or profitable

Posted from my mobile device Image
Re: The recycling of municipal solid waste is widely seen as an   [#permalink] 02 May 2016, 13:10
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
2 Experts publish their posts in the topic The roof of Northtown's municipal equipment-storage LithiumIon 4 16 Jun 2015, 18:18
1 The fire that destroyed the Municipal Building tuanquang269 3 29 Jul 2014, 08:42
22 Experts publish their posts in the topic There are those who complain that municipal libraries are voodoochild 16 21 Aug 2012, 13:49
3 In a certain municipality, a judge overturned a suspect s noboru 17 30 Oct 2010, 06:57
Experts publish their posts in the topic The fire that destroyed the Municipal Building started gmatprep09 16 23 Apr 2010, 12:32
Display posts from previous: Sort by

The recycling of municipal solid waste is widely seen as an

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.