Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 23 Jul 2014, 14:17

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

The recycling of municipal solid waste is widely seen as an

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 13 Nov 2003
Posts: 971
Location: Florida
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
The recycling of municipal solid waste is widely seen as an [#permalink] New post 30 Nov 2003, 13:56
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  5% (low)

Question Stats:

50% (03:22) correct 50% (00:00) wrong based on 13 sessions
The recycling of municipal solid waste is widely seen as an environmentally preferable alternative to the prevailing practices of incineration and of dumping in landfills. Recycling is profitable, as the
recycling programs already in operation demonstrate. A state legislator proposes that communities should therefore be required to adopt recycling and to reach the target of recycling 50 percent of all solid waste within 5 years.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously calls into question the advisability of implementing the proposal?

(A) Existing recycling programs have been voluntary, with citizen participation ranging from 30 percent in some communities to 80
percent in others.

(B) Existing recycling programs have been restricted to that 20 percent of solid waste that, when reprocessed, can match processed raw
materials in quality and price.

(C) Existing recycling programs have had recurrent difficulties finding purchasers for their materials usually because of quantities too
small to permit cost-effective pickup and transportation.

(D) Some of the materials that can be recycled are the very materials that, when incinerated, produce the least pollution.

(E) Many of the materials that cannot be recycled are also difficult to incinerate.
CEO
CEO
avatar
Joined: 15 Aug 2003
Posts: 3470
Followers: 59

Kudos [?]: 657 [0], given: 781

Re: CR - explanation?? [#permalink] New post 30 Nov 2003, 14:28
dj wrote:
The recycling of municipal solid waste is widely seen as an environmentally preferable alternative to the prevailing practices of incineration and of dumping in landfills. Recycling is profitable, as the
recycling programs already in operation demonstrate. A state legislator proposes that communities should therefore be required to adopt
recycling and to reach the target of recycling 50 percent of all solid waste within 5 years.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously calls
into question the advisability of implementing the
proposal?
(A) Existing recycling programs have been voluntary, with citizen participation ranging from 30 percent in some communities to 80
percent in others.
(B) Existing recycling programs have been restricted to that 20 percent of solid waste that, when reprocessed, can match processed raw
materials in quality and price.
(C) Existing recycling programs have had recurrent difficulties finding purchasers for their materials usually because of quantities too
small to permit cost-effective pickup and transportation.
(D) Some of the materials that can be recycled are the very materials that, when incinerated, produce the least pollution.
(E) Many of the materials that cannot be recycled are also difficult to incinerate.


A and B are close..

A ... if the plan is to recycle 50% of ALL solid waste...then A casts doubt on that plan...because ALL solid waste means ALL SOLID waste is collected..BUT ... we could have regulations..which force communities to
participate in these programs.

B... if only 20% of the waste can be recycled now, the plan would not work.... we may or may not be able to reach the target of 50%

i think B
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 15 Sep 2003
Posts: 75
Location: california
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 01 Dec 2003, 10:47
i would say B also:

although i feel A is incorrect b/c it is out of scope...we don't care how many people have been participating b/c we just want to show that it might not be profitable even if people participate...

in order to weaken the argument we must simply attack the main premise "recycling is profitable" -->the regulator says that b/c recycling is profitable then all the communities should do it....so just look for the answer choices that might show otherwise (that recycling might not be as profitable as we think).

Only B and D call this into question, and D doesn't go far enough b/c it only says "some" of the materials that can be recycled produce the least pollution...if it said that "all" the materials that can be recycled produce the least amount of pollution if incinerated, then it might be more compelling....

B shows that the recycling has only been restricted to the most profitable 20% of the total solid waste, so if the up the % to 50, then they might inevitable have 30% that might not be profitable if recycled....the way it stands B is correct IMO...
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 05 May 2003
Posts: 427
Location: Aus
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 01 Dec 2003, 14:50
B is my choice too.

A is out of scope as IMO has already explained. Existing recycling programs could be voluntary. But if it becomes a law everyone will have to participate in the program.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 28 Apr 2011
Posts: 196
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 6

Re: The recycling of municipal solid waste is widely seen as an [#permalink] New post 04 Apr 2012, 09:22
IMO B......

as 20% to 50 % is big jump and may not have same end result
Re: The recycling of municipal solid waste is widely seen as an   [#permalink] 04 Apr 2012, 09:22
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Solids dishant007 3 19 Apr 2008, 19:04
The recycling of municipal solid waste is widely seen as an joemama142000 11 07 Nov 2005, 16:54
The fire that destroyed the Municipal Building started WinWinMBA 10 07 Jun 2005, 16:07
The recycling of municipal solid waste is widely seen as an krishrads 5 19 May 2005, 14:10
Municipal officials originally estimated that it would be chunjuwu 2 09 Mar 2005, 00:42
Display posts from previous: Sort by

The recycling of municipal solid waste is widely seen as an

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.