The report into Government interference in the running of : GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR)
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 16 Jan 2017, 05:08

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# The report into Government interference in the running of

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Director
Joined: 24 Aug 2007
Posts: 954
WE 1: 3.5 yrs IT
WE 2: 2.5 yrs Retail chain
Followers: 76

Kudos [?]: 1270 [0], given: 40

The report into Government interference in the running of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Apr 2010, 10:06
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

57% (02:18) correct 43% (01:19) wrong based on 16 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

The report into Government interference in the running of local authorities should be regarded as suspicious as its main author is Sir William Henderson, who campaigned vigorously on behalf of the opposing party at the last general election.
Which of the following forms the most appropriate criticism to the argument contained in the statement above?

A)It ignores the possible political affiliations of the other authors of the report.
B) It does not take into account the possibility that Sir William may have altered his political allegiance since the general election.
C) It fails to consider the possibility that Sir William may be an expert on local authorities.
D) It assumes that Sir William's ability to write an unbiased report is compromised by his political allegiance.
E) It assumes that Sir William's inability to sway the last election in favour of the opposing party indicates that he is equally unable to write a convincing report on local authorities.
_________________

Want to improve your CR: http://gmatclub.com/forum/cr-methods-an-approach-to-find-the-best-answers-93146.html
Tricky Quant problems: http://gmatclub.com/forum/50-tricky-questions-92834.html
Important Grammer Fundamentals: http://gmatclub.com/forum/key-fundamentals-of-grammer-our-crucial-learnings-on-sc-93659.html

If you have any questions
you can ask an expert
New!
Manager
Joined: 29 Oct 2009
Posts: 201
Concentration: General Management, Sustainability
WE: Consulting (Computer Software)
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 92 [0], given: 12

Re: Sir William Henderson, who campaigned vigorously [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Apr 2010, 10:53
IMO it is D.

D) It assumes that Sir William's ability to write an unbiased report is compromised by his political allegiance.
>> Yes. This is the correct assumption from which the argument says his report is suspicious.
_________________

+1Kudos, if this helps

Senior Manager
Joined: 24 Jul 2009
Posts: 297
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 130 [0], given: 0

Re: Sir William Henderson, who campaigned vigorously [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Apr 2010, 11:07
this is weaken the argument question.!!

IMHO B.
Manager
Joined: 20 Mar 2007
Posts: 62
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 0

Re: Sir William Henderson, who campaigned vigorously [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Apr 2010, 12:22
nverma wrote:
this is weaken the argument question.!!

IMHO B.

I dont get it.Does the argument not assume the association as described in choice D?If that assumption is flawed ->i.e If Sir William can write an unbiased report irrespective of his political affiliations,is the argument not weakened?Please explain how you ruled out this answer in favour of choice B.

Going with D here.OA pls.
Manager
Joined: 20 Nov 2009
Posts: 167
Followers: 8

Kudos [?]: 201 [0], given: 64

Re: Sir William Henderson, who campaigned vigorously [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Apr 2010, 23:28
IMO: D
_________________

But there’s something in me that just keeps going on. I think it has something to do with tomorrow, that there is always one, and that everything can change when it comes.
http://aimingformba.blogspot.com

Senior Manager
Joined: 24 Jul 2009
Posts: 297
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 130 [0], given: 0

Re: Sir William Henderson, who campaigned vigorously [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Apr 2010, 01:11
Kiski wrote:
nverma wrote:
this is weaken the argument question.!!

IMHO B.

I dont get it.Does the argument not assume the association as described in choice D?If that assumption is flawed ->i.e If Sir William can write an unbiased report irrespective of his political affiliations,is the argument not weakened?Please explain how you ruled out this answer in favour of choice B.

Going with D here.OA pls.

I may be wrong here, but i think

the premise is:

"Sir William Henderson campaigned vigorously on behalf of the opposing party at the last general election"

conclusion:

"Report must be suspicious"

I think B directly weakens/doubts the Premise.
OA plz..!!
Senior Manager
Joined: 07 Jan 2010
Posts: 250
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 16

Re: Sir William Henderson, who campaigned vigorously [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Apr 2010, 03:53
I will vote for A.
The conclusion concerns Williams' truthfulness because of his previous political association. If you point out that any person writing such a report will have some political background, then you disapprove the conclusion most.
B,C, and D could go either way: one answer could strengthen the argument, and other would weaken it.
E is OOS I think.
Director
Joined: 24 Aug 2007
Posts: 954
WE 1: 3.5 yrs IT
WE 2: 2.5 yrs Retail chain
Followers: 76

Kudos [?]: 1270 [0], given: 40

Re: Sir William Henderson, who campaigned vigorously [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 May 2010, 03:55
OA is D.
_________________

Want to improve your CR: http://gmatclub.com/forum/cr-methods-an-approach-to-find-the-best-answers-93146.html
Tricky Quant problems: http://gmatclub.com/forum/50-tricky-questions-92834.html
Important Grammer Fundamentals: http://gmatclub.com/forum/key-fundamentals-of-grammer-our-crucial-learnings-on-sc-93659.html

Re: Sir William Henderson, who campaigned vigorously   [#permalink] 21 May 2010, 03:55
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
We doubt that the latest government report will scare 5 06 Feb 2012, 02:59
2 Consumer income reports produced by the govern- ment 12 15 Dec 2010, 16:38
An oligarchy is a government run by a small, conservative 11 23 Jul 2009, 15:24
1 Consumer income reports produced by the government 9 27 Jan 2008, 15:35
A report of a government survey concluded that Center City 7 09 Mar 2007, 13:54
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# The report into Government interference in the running of

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.