Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 22 Sep 2014, 10:34

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

The retail price of decaffeinated coffee is considerably

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 16 Feb 2011
Posts: 197
Schools: ABCD
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 34 [0], given: 78

GMAT Tests User
The retail price of decaffeinated coffee is considerably [#permalink] New post 31 Jul 2012, 05:33
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  35% (medium)

Question Stats:

67% (02:22) correct 33% (01:39) wrong based on 239 sessions
The retail price of decaffeinated coffee is considerably higher than that of regular coffee. However, the process by which coffee beans are decaffeinated is fairly simple and not very costly. Therefore, the price difference cannot be accounted for by the greater cost of providing decaffeinated coffee to consumer.

The argument relies on assuming which one of the following?

A. Process regular coffee costs more than processing decaffeinated coffee.
B. Price differences between products can generally be accounted for by such factors as supply and demand, not by differences in production costs.
C. There is little competition among companies that process decaffeinated coffee.
D. Retail coffee-sellers do not expect that consumers are content to pay more for decaffeinated coffee than for regular coffee.
E. The beans used for producing decaffeinated coffee do not cost much more before processing than the beans used for producing regular coffee.

There is no doubt about OA.

(Got this from a forum) - The book says that D is a weakener. Can you please explain why? In my opinion, D has no effect because it denies the 'possibility' (shopkeepers think) of supply-demand influencing the prices. Essentially, it's a mild strengthener - similar to those EXCEPT questions.
Thoughts?
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
Expert Post
MBA Section Director
User avatar
Joined: 19 Mar 2012
Posts: 1687
Location: India
GPA: 3.8
WE: Marketing (Energy and Utilities)
Followers: 659

Kudos [?]: 2832 [0], given: 883

Re: The retail price of decaffeinated coffee is considerably h [#permalink] New post 31 Jul 2012, 07:22
Expert's post
Retail coffee-sellers do not expect that consumers are content to pay more for decaffeinated coffee than for regular coffee.
I think if retailers thought consumers wont agree to pay higher prices, it would charge less for decaf
though this option is waaay out of scope.
_________________

My GMAT Resources
V30-V40: How to do it! | GMATPrep SC | GMATPrep CR | GMATPrep RC | Critical Reasoning Megathread | CR: Numbers and Statistics | CR: Weaken | CR: Strengthen | CR: Assumption | SC: Modifier | SC: Meaning | SC: SV Agreement | RC: Primary Purpose | PS/DS: Numbers and Inequalities | PS/DS: Combinatorics and Coordinates

My MBA Resources
Everything about the MBA Application | Over-Represented MBA woes | Fit Vs Rankings | Low GPA: What you can do | Letter of Recommendation: The Guide | Indian B Schools accepting GMAT score | Why MBA?

My Reviews
Veritas Prep Live Online

Expert Post
1 KUDOS received
Manhattan GMAT Instructor
User avatar
Joined: 08 May 2012
Posts: 51
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 770 Q50 V47
Followers: 183

Kudos [?]: 150 [1] , given: 4

Re: The retail price of decaffeinated coffee is considerably h [#permalink] New post 31 Jul 2012, 10:19
1
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
voodoochild wrote:
The retail price of decaffeinated coffee is considerably higher than that of regular coffee. However, the process by which coffee beans are decaffeinated is fairly simple and not very costly. Therefore, the price difference cannot be accounted for by the greater cost of providing decaffeinated coffee to consumer.

The argument relies on assuming which one of the following?

A. Process regular coffee costs more than processing decaffeinated coffee.
B. Price differences between products can generally be accounted for by such factors as supply and demand, not by differences in production costs.
C. There is little competition among companies that process decaffeinated coffee.
D. Retail coffee-sellers do not expect that consumers are content to pay more for decaffeinated coffee than for regular coffee.
E. The beans used for producing decaffeinated coffee do not cost much more before processing than the beans used for producing regular coffee.

There is no doubt about OA.

(Got this from a forum) - The book says that D) is a weakener. Can you please explain why? In my opinion, D) has no effect because it denies the 'possibility' (shopkeepers think) of supply-demand influencing the prices. Essentially, it's a mild strengthener - similar to those EXCEPT questions.

Thoughts?


Here's a useful trick for testing whether a statement weakens or strengthens – look at the opposite statement!

Sometimes the relevance of the opposite (or negation) of a statement is easier to discern. In this case, we have

(not D) Retail coffee-sellers do expect that consumers are content to pay more for decaf...

Well if that's the case, then retailers can get away with charging more and it has nothing to do with the cost of decaffeinating the coffee. So, (not D) is definitely relevant and definitely strengthens the argument. It must be the case that (D) then weakens.

Hope that helps!
_________________


Mark Sullivan | Manhattan GMAT Instructor | Seattle, WA


Manhattan GMAT Discount | Manhattan GMAT Course Reviews | View Instructor Profile


Expert Post
1 KUDOS received
Manhattan GMAT Instructor
User avatar
Joined: 08 May 2012
Posts: 51
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 770 Q50 V47
Followers: 183

Kudos [?]: 150 [1] , given: 4

Re: The retail price of decaffeinated coffee is considerably h [#permalink] New post 31 Jul 2012, 10:21
1
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
Follow-up note to my previous comment:

Negating a statement can sometimes be confusing and always time-consuming, so this is a technique you should only use when you are down to just a couple choices and really can't make a decision. But, in those scenarios I find it pretty useful.

Cheers,
Mark
_________________


Mark Sullivan | Manhattan GMAT Instructor | Seattle, WA


Manhattan GMAT Discount | Manhattan GMAT Course Reviews | View Instructor Profile


Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 16 Feb 2011
Posts: 197
Schools: ABCD
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 34 [0], given: 78

GMAT Tests User
Re: The retail price of decaffeinated coffee is considerably h [#permalink] New post 02 Aug 2012, 19:46
MarkSullivan wrote:
Follow-up note to my previous comment:

Negating a statement can sometimes be confusing and always time-consuming, so this is a technique you should only use when you are down to just a couple choices and really can't make a decision. But, in those scenarios I find it pretty useful.

Cheers,
Mark



Mark,
Thanks for your reply. However, I am not sure how retailers' expectation has got anything to do with the prices! For instance, a gas station could *expect* customers to pay $5K/gallon. However, that's not how the real prices are assigned. There is an economics to it. I, as a customer, could expect to pay only $0.01/gallon for the gas. What effect does it have on the gas prices? Nothing.

Am I correct?

Appreciate your thoughts.

Thanks
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 16 Oct 2011
Posts: 135
Location: United States
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 5

Reviews Badge
Re: The retail price of decaffeinated coffee is considerably [#permalink] New post 03 Aug 2012, 12:33
voodoochild wrote:
The retail price of decaffeinated coffee is considerably higher than that of regular coffee. However, the process by which coffee beans are decaffeinated is fairly simple and not very costly. Therefore, the price difference cannot be accounted for by the greater cost of providing decaffeinated coffee to consumer.

The argument relies on assuming which one of the following?

A. Process regular coffee costs more than processing decaffeinated coffee.
B. Price differences between products can generally be accounted for by such factors as supply and demand, not by differences in production costs.
C. There is little competition among companies that process decaffeinated coffee.
D. Retail coffee-sellers do not expect that consumers are content to pay more for decaffeinated coffee than for regular coffee.
E. The beans used for producing decaffeinated coffee do not cost much more before processing than the beans used for producing regular coffee.

There is no doubt about OA.

(Got this from a forum) - The book says that D) is a weakener. Can you please explain why? In my opinion, D) has no effect because it denies the 'possibility' (shopkeepers think) of supply-demand influencing the prices. Essentially, it's a mild strengthener - similar to those EXCEPT questions.

Thoughts?


OA is fine.

About D -
Conclusion - Price difference is not due to the decaffeinating process, yet price is high.
D says - Retailers do not expect customers to pay more for this high-priced coffee. In such a case, the retailers would not be selling the decaff. coffee at a higher rate. That means, if they do not expect customers to buy decaff. coffee at such a high rate, it implies that the retailers don't perceive decaff. coffee to be so specially sold - Rather, high-pricing of decaff. coffee is unintentional and is probably a cause of the expensive decaff. process.
I cannot call this a complete weakener. The alternate cause is not clearly given in this choice. So, if its the same cause as given in the premise, it is a weakener, else, OOS.

Thanks.
VP
VP
avatar
Status: Final Lap Up!!!
Affiliations: NYK Line
Joined: 21 Sep 2012
Posts: 1096
Location: India
GMAT 1: 410 Q35 V11
GMAT 2: 530 Q44 V20
GMAT 3: 630 Q45 V31
GPA: 3.84
WE: Engineering (Transportation)
Followers: 31

Kudos [?]: 265 [0], given: 67

Re: The retail price of decaffeinated coffee is considerably [#permalink] New post 26 Mar 2013, 08:33
Cannot understand why is B not a correct answer. Its defender model as far as i understand.
Retail Cost of X is higher, that does not Cost in providing will be higher.
B says Higher retail cost is because of y,z but not because of cost providing

Pls help me
Archit
GMAT Pill Representative
User avatar
Joined: 07 Nov 2012
Posts: 346
Schools: LBS '14 (A)
GMAT 1: 770 Q48 V48
Followers: 138

Kudos [?]: 182 [0], given: 4

Re: The retail price of decaffeinated coffee is considerably [#permalink] New post 27 Mar 2013, 00:45
Hi Archit,

I agree, B is a tricky one. Here is how I figured it out...

The key is in looking at what the argument actually is:

Therefore, the price difference cannot be accounted for by the greater cost of providing decaffeinated coffee to consumer.

What does this rely on?

Here is B

B. Price differences between products can generally be accounted for by such factors as supply and demand, not by differences in production costs.


If you look at the two bold sentences together in isolation it becomes clearer that the second one is NOT an assumption of the first. That the price difference can not be accounted for because of one factor, is not dependent on a different reason for price difference.

Hope that helps..

james
_________________

Former GMAT Pill student, now on staff. Used GMATPILL OG 12 and nothing else: 770 (48,48) & 6.0



... and more

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 15 Mar 2012
Posts: 61
Location: United States
Concentration: Marketing, Strategy
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 19

Re: The retail price of decaffeinated coffee is considerably [#permalink] New post 27 Mar 2013, 09:16
Please explain why E is OA.

The fact that the beans used to produce decaf do not cost much more than the beans used to produce reg coffee is irrelevant. What is relevant is the cost of both processes, not cost of beans used in the process.
_________________

MV
"Better to fight for something than live for nothing.” ― George S. Patton Jr

GMAT Pill Representative
User avatar
Joined: 07 Nov 2012
Posts: 346
Schools: LBS '14 (A)
GMAT 1: 770 Q48 V48
Followers: 138

Kudos [?]: 182 [0], given: 4

Re: The retail price of decaffeinated coffee is considerably [#permalink] New post 27 Mar 2013, 09:19
Hi,

I disagree with you.

If you think about producing anything, there are 2 costs that matter:
1) Raw materials
2) Cost of the process

So if we know that the process costs the same the only other thing that can affect the production cost is the raw materials.

So if we know that the raw materials (coffee beans) cost the same, then we can be sure that the production costs are equal for decaffinated and caffinated coffee.

Hope that makes sense.

james
_________________

Former GMAT Pill student, now on staff. Used GMATPILL OG 12 and nothing else: 770 (48,48) & 6.0



... and more

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 15 Mar 2012
Posts: 61
Location: United States
Concentration: Marketing, Strategy
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 19

Re: The retail price of decaffeinated coffee is considerably [#permalink] New post 27 Mar 2013, 09:27
Good point James, very well said.

Posted from my mobile device Image
_________________

MV
"Better to fight for something than live for nothing.” ― George S. Patton Jr

Expert Post
2 KUDOS received
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
User avatar
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 4785
Location: Pune, India
Followers: 1123

Kudos [?]: 5092 [2] , given: 164

Re: The retail price of decaffeinated coffee is considerably [#permalink] New post 27 Mar 2013, 20:37
2
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
Archit143 wrote:
Cannot understand why is B not a correct answer. Its defender model as far as i understand.
Retail Cost of X is higher, that does not Cost in providing will be higher.
B says Higher retail cost is because of y,z but not because of cost providing

Pls help me
Archit


Premises:
The retail price of decaffeinated coffee is considerably higher than that of regular coffee.
However, the process by which coffee beans are decaffeinated is fairly simple and not very costly.

Conclusion: The price difference cannot be accounted for by the greater cost of providing decaffeinated coffee to consumer.

Understand here what the conclusion is. It is that greater cost of providing decaf coffee does not lead to the price difference.
This means the author wants to say that there is another factor at play because of which price of decaf is high. That 'other factor' could be anything other than cost of providing decaf coffee.
Option (b) tells you that 'supply and demand' forces set the prices, not the cost of providing the product. This strengthens the author's argument. It is one of the 'other factors'. The option is telling you that yes, there is an 'other factor' which accounts for the greater price of decaf.

Now, what could be the assumption here? What do we need to be true to say that 'cost of providing decaffeinated coffee' is not higher?
The argument already tells us that the process of decaf is simple and not expensive. But it doesn't say anything about raw material cost. When the author says 'cost of providing decaffeinated coffee', it includes both raw material and process cost. He only tells us that process cost is not high. He is assuming that the raw material cost is also not high. Only then can he say that 'cost of providing decaffeinated coffee' is not high and that some other factor is at play which sets the price of decaf coffee high.

So (E) is the assumption.
_________________

Karishma
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor
My Blog

Save $100 on Veritas Prep GMAT Courses And Admissions Consulting
Enroll now. Pay later. Take advantage of Veritas Prep's flexible payment plan options.

Veritas Prep Reviews

Verbal Forum Moderator
Verbal Forum Moderator
avatar
Joined: 23 Jul 2010
Posts: 484
Followers: 40

Kudos [?]: 428 [0], given: 243

Premium Member
Re: The retail price of decaffeinated coffee is considerably [#permalink] New post 06 Nov 2013, 07:32
Re: The retail price of decaffeinated coffee is considerably   [#permalink] 06 Nov 2013, 07:32
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Experts publish their posts in the topic The original retail price of an appliance was 60 percent jlgdr 1 11 Oct 2013, 16:28
Experts publish their posts in the topic Many retailers advertise price-matching policies, such as, gmatbull 8 12 Nov 2012, 10:44
Experts publish their posts in the topic A retailer bought a machine at a wholesale price of $90 and monirjewel 4 14 Nov 2010, 22:29
2 For a sale, the original retail price of a particular shirt Economist 6 07 Sep 2009, 13:10
Carl s Coffee Emporium stocks only two decaffeinated vaivish1723 0 01 Jul 2009, 00:10
Display posts from previous: Sort by

The retail price of decaffeinated coffee is considerably

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.