The senator has long held to the general principle that no : GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR)
Check GMAT Club App Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

It is currently 08 Dec 2016, 05:36
GMAT Club Tests

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

The senator has long held to the general principle that no

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 16 Sep 2006
Posts: 406
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 66 [0], given: 0

The senator has long held to the general principle that no [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Nov 2006, 09:55
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

50% (01:02) correct 50% (00:00) wrong based on 2 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

8. The senator has long held to the general principle that no true work of art is obscene, and thus that there is no conflict between the need to encourage free artistic expression and the need to protect the sensibilities of the public from obscenity. When well-known works generally viewed as obscene are cited as possible counterexamples, the senator justifies accepting the principle by saying that if these works really are obscene then they cannot be works of art.
The senator’s reasoning contains which one of the following errors?
(A) It seeks to persuade by emotional rather than intellectual means.
(B) It contains an implicit contradiction.
(C) It relies on an assertion of the senator’s authority.
(D) It assumes what it seeks to establish.
(E) It attempts to justify a position by appeal to an irrelevant consideration.
Request Expert Reply
If you have any questions
you can ask an expert
New!
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 21 Aug 2006
Posts: 1025
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 29 [0], given: 0

Re: The senator -CR! [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Nov 2006, 10:03
jyotsnasarabu wrote:
8. The senator has long held to the general principle that no true work of art is obscene, and thus that there is no conflict between the need to encourage free artistic expression and the need to protect the sensibilities of the public from obscenity. When well-known works generally viewed as obscene are cited as possible counterexamples, the senator justifies accepting the principle by saying that if these works really are obscene then they cannot be works of art.
The senator’s reasoning contains which one of the following errors?
(A) It seeks to persuade by emotional rather than intellectual means.
(B) It contains an implicit contradiction.
(C) It relies on an assertion of the senator’s authority.
(D) It assumes what it seeks to establish.

Senator wants to prove that no true work of art is obscene. When others point to well-known works that are seen as obscene, instead of he clarifying how they are not obscene, senator is saying that as "no true work of art is obscene", those obscene well-known works are not art work. So he is essentially assuming what he is trying to establish. No? :wink:

(E) It attempts to justify a position by appeal to an irrelevant consideration.

_________________

The path is long, but self-surrender makes it short;
the way is difficult, but perfect trust makes it easy.


Last edited by ak_idc on 19 Nov 2006, 19:07, edited 1 time in total.
VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 28 Mar 2006
Posts: 1381
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 0

Re: The senator -CR! [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Nov 2006, 10:07
ak_idc wrote:
jyotsnasarabu wrote:
8. The senator has long held to the general principle that no true work of art is obscene, and thus that there is no conflict between the need to encourage free artistic expression and the need to protect the sensibilities of the public from obscenity. When well-known works generally viewed as obscene are cited as possible counterexamples, the senator justifies accepting the principle by saying that if these works really are obscene then they cannot be works of art.
The senator’s reasoning contains which one of the following errors?
(A) It seeks to persuade by emotional rather than intellectual means.
(B) It contains an implicit contradiction.
(C) It relies on an assertion of the senator’s authority.
(D) It assumes what it seeks to establish.

Senator wants to prove that no true work of art is obscene. When others point to well-known works that are scene as obscene, instead of he clarifying how they are not obscene, senator is saying that as "no true work of art is obscene", those obscene well-known works are not art work. So he is essentially assuming what he is trying to establish. No? :wink:

(E) It attempts to justify a position by appeal to an irrelevant consideration.


Thats true. The senator relies on assumption to establish the given condition.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 16 Sep 2006
Posts: 406
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 66 [0], given: 0

Re: The senator -CR! [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Nov 2006, 10:07
ak_idc wrote:
jyotsnasarabu wrote:
8. The senator has long held to the general principle that no true work of art is obscene, and thus that there is no conflict between the need to encourage free artistic expression and the need to protect the sensibilities of the public from obscenity. When well-known works generally viewed as obscene are cited as possible counterexamples, the senator justifies accepting the principle by saying that if these works really are obscene then they cannot be works of art.
The senator’s reasoning contains which one of the following errors?
(A) It seeks to persuade by emotional rather than intellectual means.
(B) It contains an implicit contradiction.
(C) It relies on an assertion of the senator’s authority.
(D) It assumes what it seeks to establish.

Senator wants to prove that no true work of art is obscene. When others point to well-known works that are scene as obscene, instead of he clarifying how they are not obscene, senator is saying that as "no true work of art is obscene", those obscene well-known works are not art work. So he is essentially assuming what he is trying to establish. No? :wink:



(E) It attempts to justify a position by appeal to an irrelevant consideration.



For once i wish i cud say no to an answer given by u..................but u never never give me the leeway :-D .....too bad aaaaaaa
VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 15 Jul 2004
Posts: 1473
Schools: Wharton (R2 - submitted); HBS (R2 - submitted); IIMA (admitted for 1 year PGPX)
Followers: 22

Kudos [?]: 169 [0], given: 13

Re: The senator -CR! [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Nov 2006, 12:01
jyotsnasarabu wrote:
ak_idc wrote:
jyotsnasarabu wrote:
8. The senator has long held to the general principle that no true work of art is obscene, and thus that there is no conflict between the need to encourage free artistic expression and the need to protect the sensibilities of the public from obscenity. When well-known works generally viewed as obscene are cited as possible counterexamples, the senator justifies accepting the principle by saying that if these works really are obscene then they cannot be works of art.
The senator’s reasoning contains which one of the following errors?
(A) It seeks to persuade by emotional rather than intellectual means.
(B) It contains an implicit contradiction.
(C) It relies on an assertion of the senator’s authority.
(D) It assumes what it seeks to establish.

Senator wants to prove that no true work of art is obscene. When others point to well-known works that are scene as obscene, instead of he clarifying how they are not obscene, senator is saying that as "no true work of art is obscene", those obscene well-known works are not art work. So he is essentially assuming what he is trying to establish. No? :wink:



(E) It attempts to justify a position by appeal to an irrelevant consideration.



For once i wish i cud say no to an answer given by u..................but u never never give me the leeway :-D .....too bad aaaaaaa


LOL. That was really funny Jyotsna :P
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 03 Jul 2005
Posts: 192
Location: City
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Nov 2006, 12:53
Hey I got D as well, but I'm one of those who gets a few wrong as well!
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 12 Jul 2006
Posts: 114
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 23 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Nov 2006, 15:05
Agree with D. While reading the stem I started thinking that the senator's reasoning was circular. I believe D best conveys circular reasoning.
_________________

I think I can. I think I can. I think I can.

GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
User avatar
Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Posts: 5062
Location: Singapore
Followers: 30

Kudos [?]: 348 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Nov 2006, 17:50
D is the answer. The senator assumes that since the work is obscene, then it's not a work of art. This simply seeks to establish what he already believed in.
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 25 Jun 2006
Posts: 1172
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 145 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Nov 2006, 21:15
D for circular reasoning.
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 17 Jul 2006
Posts: 714
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Nov 2006, 12:05
D for me too.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 08 Jun 2006
Posts: 340
Location: Washington DC
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 45 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Nov 2006, 12:19
I got D too
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 16 Sep 2006
Posts: 406
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 66 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Nov 2006, 12:49
Wowwwwwwwww..............were are likeminded lot here...................................D Rocks folks.......................
  [#permalink] 20 Nov 2006, 12:49
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
6 Senator Baker: My opponent, Candidate Rothmore, has called for Harley1980 6 09 Aug 2015, 11:54
1 Senator Baker: My opponent, Candidate Rothmore, has called for increas tia2112 5 09 Jun 2015, 11:48
4 Mayor: The annual rock festival held in our town has gained guerrero25 6 15 Sep 2013, 04:15
7 Experts publish their posts in the topic Scientist: Evolutionary biology has long held that the most GetThisDone 14 05 May 2012, 21:48
The senator has long held to the general principle that no az780 7 18 Feb 2008, 07:37
Display posts from previous: Sort by

The senator has long held to the general principle that no

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.