Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 22 Aug 2014, 03:54

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

The State Constitution bans the Legislature from reducing

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 14 Jul 2004
Posts: 700
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
The State Constitution bans the Legislature from reducing [#permalink] New post 18 Aug 2005, 18:10
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
The State Constitution bans the Legislature from reducing the benefit package of state and local workers during their employment, but it does not allow improvement of the package. Thus, the governer's veto power remains as the only possible obstacle to the new pension enhancement program for recently hired public school teachers.

The author of the argument is assuming which of the following?

A) The governer wants to reduce the benefit package
B) The new pension program is not part of the benefit packge
C) The legistature supports the new pension program
D) The governer will probably veto the new pension program
E) The State Constituion permits the governer to reduce the benefit package of employees during their employment.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 15 Aug 2005
Posts: 202
Location: New York
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 18 Aug 2005, 20:31
D seems right.
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 11 Mar 2005
Posts: 726
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 18 Aug 2005, 20:32
Confusing between B and C

Looks C to me...
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 05 Apr 2005
Posts: 1736
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 32 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR: State Constitution [#permalink] New post 18 Aug 2005, 20:59
D should be ok. veto itself is nothing unless it is used. so D is assumed.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 28 Jan 2004
Posts: 207
Location: Ghana
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 19 Aug 2005, 01:00
IMO D does not clearly state whether the veto will approve the enhancement or not.

Because of the statement "the governor's veto power remains as the only possible obstacle...." i will pick A.
_________________

It's not over until it's OVER!

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 21 Mar 2005
Posts: 115
Location: Basel
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 19 Aug 2005, 02:03
one more D
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 05 Jan 2005
Posts: 561
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR: State Constitution [#permalink] New post 19 Aug 2005, 02:54
A) The governer wants to reduce the benefit package
This is out. WE do not care about the intentions of the gov.

B) The new pension program is not part of the benefit packge
out-of-scope. we do not care if it is or if it is not

C) The legistature supports the new pension program
'Best' Answer, IMO. My choice.

D) The governer will probably veto the new pension program
An outcome we are not interested in. Out

E) The State Constituion permits the governer to reduce the benefit package of employees during their employment.

The gov. can reducee the benefit package, but we do not know if he is allowed to increase it. insufficient info. to support the conclsn.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 28 Jun 2005
Posts: 219
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 19 Aug 2005, 04:22
I will go with C
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 29 Nov 2004
Posts: 486
Location: Chicago
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR: State Constitution [#permalink] New post 19 Aug 2005, 05:12
IMO it is E.

D can be rejected because it is similar in sense to A.
B is rejected because from the statement the package clearly includes the new pension program
C is out of scope, since legislature has no say, they cannot add or remove anything to the package
_________________

Fear Mediocrity, Respect Ignorance

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 02 Feb 2004
Posts: 345
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 19 Aug 2005, 06:45
another vote for C.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 04 May 2005
Posts: 284
Location: CA, USA
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 21 Aug 2005, 07:15
between A and D

A is too strong - even though it is only a possiblity

D is rephrasing the governor's possible veto

C is not correct because the paragraph only describes the law, does not
indicate clearly the intention of the Legislature.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 10 Aug 2005
Posts: 27
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 21 Aug 2005, 13:05
Is there a typo in the question? ("not" in the second line)
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 14 Jul 2004
Posts: 700
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 21 Aug 2005, 14:09
No there isnt a typo. I verified the question again. The OA is C.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 04 May 2005
Posts: 284
Location: CA, USA
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 21 Aug 2005, 19:29
Looked at the question again, agree it should be C

Earlier I chose D because

[q]The State Constitution bans the Legislature from reducing the benefit package of state and local workers during their employment, but it does not allow improvement of the package. [/q]

I did not realize there were two programs, the old which the legislature cannot do much about (reduce or enhance), and the new one.
The author indicated the only obstacle being possible governor veto - implying the Legislature is for the new plan.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 13 Jan 2005
Posts: 331
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 23 Aug 2005, 10:02
I will go with C.

GA
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 09 Nov 2004
Posts: 138
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 27 Aug 2005, 09:10
people who have chosen C, can they support it with reasoning?

So isn't C a part of the benefit package?
_________________

Thanks!

GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
User avatar
Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Posts: 5097
Location: Singapore
Followers: 17

Kudos [?]: 136 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 27 Aug 2005, 22:36
Premise:
1) The State Constitution bans the Legislature from reducing the benefit package of state and local workers during their employment

2) It does not allow improvement of the package

Conclusion:

3) governer's veto power remains as the only possible obstacle to the new pension enhancement program for recently hired public school teachers.

I'll go with E. The author assumes that the state constitution permits the governer to have the power to reduce the benefit package, and so stated that the governor is the only obstacle to the new program.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 09 Nov 2004
Posts: 138
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR: State Constitution [#permalink] New post 28 Aug 2005, 06:06
gmataquaguy wrote:
The State Constitution bans the Legislature from reducing the benefit package of state and local workers during their employment, but it does not allow improvement of the package. Thus, the governer's veto power remains as the only possible obstacle to the new pension enhancement program for recently hired public school teachers.

The author of the argument is assuming which of the following?

A) The governer wants to reduce the benefit package
B) The new pension program is not part of the benefit packge
C) The legistature supports the new pension program
D) The governer will probably veto the new pension program
E) The State Constituion permits the governer to reduce the benefit package of employees during their employment.




The question stems states that both......reducing and enhancing is not allowed.....That doesn't sound right at all.

gmataquaguy, could you verify that please?
_________________

Thanks!

Re: CR: State Constitution   [#permalink] 28 Aug 2005, 06:06
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
1 Many state legislatures are considering proposals to the SudiptoGmat 6 26 Jan 2010, 19:24
2 Experts publish their posts in the topic The State Constitution bans the legislature from reducing abhi758 24 29 Aug 2009, 08:19
Many state legislatures are considering proposals to the goalsnr 8 04 Jun 2008, 15:29
The State Constitution bans the Legislature from reducing gmatcrook 9 27 Aug 2006, 13:19
Many state legislatures are considering proposals to the christoph 3 14 Feb 2005, 23:50
Display posts from previous: Sort by

The State Constitution bans the Legislature from reducing

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


cron

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.