|
Author |
Message |
|
TAGS:
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 27 Aug 2004
Posts: 158
Location: US
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
0
[0], given: 0
|
The stated goal of the government's funding program for the [#permalink]
14 Sep 2004, 13:58
Question Stats:
82% (02:15) correct
17% (01:49) wrong based on 98 sessions
7. The stated goal of the government's funding program for the arts is to encourage the creation of works of artistic excellence. Senator Beton claims. However, that a government-funded artwork can never reflect the independent artistic conscience of the artist because artists, like anyone else who accepts financial support. Will inevitably try to please those who control the distribution of that support. Senator Beton concludes that government funding of the arts not only is a burden on taxpayers but also cannot lead to the creation of works of true artistic excellence.
Which one of the following is an assumption on which Senator Beton's argument is based?
(A) Most taxpayers have little or no interest in the creation of works of true artistic excellence.
(B) Government funding of the arts is more generous than other financial support most artists receive.
(C) Distribution of government funds for the arts is based on a broad agreement as to what constitutes artistic excellence.
(D) Once an artist has produced works of true artistic excellence. He or she will never accept government funding.
(E) A contemporary work of art that does not reflect the independent artistic conscience of the artist cannot be a work of true artistic excellence.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 19 Aug 2004
Posts: 47
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
2
[0], given: 0
|
The assumption is that independent artistic conscience only leads to the creation of works of true artistic excellence. Choice E states this assumption clearly.
So, I will go with choice E.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Joined: 20 Jul 2004
Posts: 601
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
3
[0], given: 0
|
Both C and E seem like valid assumption. I chose E, since negating that would break the conclusion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 21 Aug 2004
Posts: 145
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
3
[0], given: 0
|
7. The stated goal of the government's funding program for the arts is to encourage the creation of works of artistic excellence. Senator Beton claims. However, that a government-funded artwork can never reflect the independent artistic conscience of the artist because artists, like anyone else who accepts financial support, will inevitably try to please those who control the distribution of that support. Senator Beton concludes that government funding of the arts not only is a burden on taxpayers but also cannot lead to the creation of works of true artistic excellence.
Which one of the following is an assumption on which Senator Beton's argument is based?
(A) Most taxpayers have little or no interest in the creation of works of true artistic excellence. Out of scope
(B) Government funding of the arts is more generous than other financial support most artists receive. Out of scope
(C) Distribution of government funds for the arts is based on a broad agreement as to what constitutes artistic excellence. Not an assumption to the conclusion
(D) Once an artist has produced works of true artistic excellence. He or she will never accept government funding.
(E) A contemporary work of art that does not reflect the independent artistic conscience of the artist cannot be a work of true artistic excellence. possible answer from the evidence and conclusion. Moreso one can apply the negation rule and it works well for this one
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 27 Aug 2004
Posts: 158
Location: US
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
0
[0], given: 0
|
Great job, E is the answer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 12 Mar 2009
Posts: 318
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
13
[0], given: 1
|
The stated goal of the government s funding program for the [#permalink]
22 Feb 2010, 09:53
The stated goal of the government’s funding program for the arts is to encourage the creation of works of artistic excellence. Senator Beton claims, however, that a government-funded artwork can never reflect the independent artistic conscience of the artist because artists, like anyone else who accepts financial support, will inevitably try to please those who control the distribution of that support. Senator Beton concludes that government funding of the arts not only is a burden on taxpayers but also cannot lead to the creation of works of true artistic excellence. Which one of the following is an assumption on which Senator Beton’s argument is based? (A) Most taxpayers have little or no interest in the creation of works of true artistic excellence. (B) Government funding of the arts is more generous than other financial support most artists receive. (C) Distribution of government funds for the arts is based on a broad agreement as to what constitutes artistic excellence. (D) Once an artist has produced works of true artistic excellence, he or she will never accept government funding. (E) A contemporary work of art that does not reflect the independent artistic conscience of the artist cannot be a work of true artistic excellence. OA is PL explain.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 27 Jan 2010
Posts: 41
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
1
[0], given: 1
|
Re: art and taxpayers [#permalink]
22 Feb 2010, 10:08
Answer is E.
A: There is no relation with taxpayer interests in arts, it is only about financial burden on taxpayers B: The point is not about a comparison with other financial resources, it is about any financial support C: Passage does not talk about any agreement on artistic excellence D: Doesn't make any sense for this passage
Hope that helps.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 29 Oct 2009
Posts: 33
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
1
[0], given: 2
|
Re: art and taxpayers [#permalink]
22 Feb 2010, 10:11
Answer is E because .. Senator Beton claims, however, that a government-funded artwork can never reflect the independent artistic conscience of the artist because artists, like anyone else who accepts financial support, will inevitably try to please those who control the distribution of that support
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 14 Dec 2009
Posts: 84
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
27
[2] , given: 20
|
Re: art and taxpayers [#permalink]
22 Feb 2010, 10:18
2
This post received KUDOS
vaivish1723 wrote: The stated goal of the government’s funding program for the arts is to encourage the creation of works of artistic excellence. Senator Beton claims, however, that a government-funded artwork can never reflect the independent artistic conscience of the artist because artists, like anyone else who accepts financial support, will inevitably try to please those who control the distribution of that support. Senator Beton concludes that government funding of the arts not only is a burden on taxpayers but also cannot lead to the creation of works of true artistic excellence. Which one of the following is an assumption on which Senator Beton’s argument is based? (A) Most taxpayers have little or no interest in the creation of works of true artistic excellence. (B) Government funding of the arts is more generous than other financial support most artists receive. (C) Distribution of government funds for the arts is based on a broad agreement as to what constitutes artistic excellence. (D) Once an artist has produced works of true artistic excellence, he or she will never accept government funding. (E) A contemporary work of art that does not reflect the independent artistic conscience of the artist cannot be a work of true artistic excellence.
PL explain. Below I wrote a shorter version of the passage: The stated goal is the creation of works of artistic excellence. A government-funded artwork can NEVER reflect the independent artistic conscience of the artist. Thus, the funding cannot lead to the creation of works of true artistic excellence. Now, if we put E before THUS, we'll see the logic of this assumption: The stated goal is the creation of works of artistic excellence. A government-funded artwork can NEVER reflect the independent artistic conscience of the artist. A contemporary work of art that does not reflect the independent artistic conscience of the artist cannot be a work of true artistic excellence. Thus, the funding cannot lead to the creation of works of true artistic excellence. Think it does make sense.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CR Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Oct 2009
Posts: 470
Location: Bangalore,India
WE 1: 4yrs in IT Industry
Followers: 16
Kudos [?]:
66
[0], given: 268
|
Re: art and taxpayers [#permalink]
28 Mar 2010, 20:09
thanku it helped E it is
_________________
One Final Try.......
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 07 Jan 2010
Posts: 251
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
5
[0], given: 16
|
Re: art and taxpayers [#permalink]
06 Apr 2010, 07:36
E There is a gap between the premises and the conclusion. The senator argues that after taking money the artists produces works that serves to please the donors. He uses this evidence to claim that the artist, hence, cannot produce any a work of true artistic excellence. E fills the gap, and hence is the assumption.
Looks like personalizing the argument would work well in this case.
|
|
|
|
|
|
VP
Status: There is always something new !!
Affiliations: PMI,QAI Global,eXampleCG
Joined: 08 May 2009
Posts: 1400
Followers: 8
Kudos [?]:
84
[0], given: 10
|
Its an E.
_________________
Visit -- http://www.sustainable-sphere.com/ Promote Green Business,Sustainable Living and Green Earth !!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 16 Aug 2011
Posts: 98
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
1
[0], given: 3
|
Re: The stated goal of the government's funding program for the [#permalink]
17 Nov 2011, 00:14
E
|
|
|
|
|
|
Verbal GMAT Forum Moderator
Status: Flying over the cloud!
Joined: 17 Aug 2011
Posts: 787
Location: Viet Nam
Concentration: International Business, Finance
GPA: 3.07
Followers: 18
Kudos [?]:
80
[0], given: 35
|
Re: The stated goal of the government's funding program for the [#permalink]
17 Nov 2011, 00:56
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 25 Sep 2010
Posts: 85
Schools: HBS, LBS, Wharton, Kelloggs, Booth
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
1
[0], given: 15
|
Re: The stated goal of the government's funding program for the [#permalink]
23 Jan 2012, 09:15
+1 E. Logical flaw in the argument.
7. The stated goal of the government's funding program for the arts is to encourage the creation of works of artistic excellence. Senator Beton claims. However, that a government-funded artwork can never reflect the independent artistic conscience of the artist because artists, like anyone else who accepts financial support. Will inevitably try to please those who control the distribution of that support. Senator Beton concludes that government funding of the arts not only is a burden on taxpayers but also cannot lead to the creation of works of true artistic excellence.
Which one of the following is an assumption on which Senator Beton's argument is based?
(A) Most taxpayers have little or no interest in the creation of works of true artistic excellence. Taxpayers' interest not talked about. Irrelevant.
(B) Government funding of the arts is more generous than other financial support most artists receive. Again, comparison of govt. funding with other funding is not made. Irrelevant. (C) Distribution of government funds for the arts is based on a broad agreement as to what constitutes artistic excellence. What constitutes artistic excellence is not mentioned. (D) Once an artist has produced works of true artistic excellence. He or she will never accept government funding. Too extreme. (E) A contemporary work of art that does not reflect the independent artistic conscience of the artist cannot be a work of true artistic excellence. Correctly fills the logical gap.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 11 Oct 2009
Posts: 9
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
GMAT 1: 650 Q45 V35
WE: Analyst (Computer Software)
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
5
[0], given: 1
|
Re: The stated goal of the government's funding program for the [#permalink]
23 Jan 2012, 13:27
Counter Premise: However, that aIgovernment-funded artwork can never reflect the independent artistic conscience of the artist because artists, like anyone else who accepts financial support. Conclusion: concludes that government funding of the arts not only is a burden on taxpayers but also cannot lead to the creation of works of true artistic excellence. We need a supportive assumption to link counter premise and conclusion. Only Answer E does it.. Posted from GMAT ToolKit
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 20 Oct 2010
Posts: 32
Schools: HBS, Yale, Darden, Haas
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
1
[0], given: 0
|
Re: The stated goal of the government's funding program for the [#permalink]
25 Jan 2012, 14:54
+1E
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 19 Apr 2011
Posts: 283
Schools: Booth,NUS,St.Gallon
Followers: 3
Kudos [?]:
27
[0], given: 45
|
Re: The stated goal of the government's funding program for the [#permalink]
25 Jan 2012, 17:41
7. The stated goal of the government's funding program for the arts is to encourage the creation of works of artistic excellence. Senator Beton claims. However, that a government-funded artwork can never reflect the independent artistic conscience of the artist because artists, like anyone else who accepts financial support. Will inevitably try to please those who control the distribution of that support. Senator Beton concludes that government funding of the arts not only is a burden on taxpayers but also cannot lead to the creation of works of true artistic excellence. Which one of the following is an assumption on which Senator Beton's argument is based? (A) Most taxpayers have little or no interest in the creation of works of true artistic excellence. (B) Government funding of the arts is more generous than other financial support most artists receive. (C) Distribution of government funds for the arts is based on a broad agreement as to what constitutes artistic excellence. (D) Once an artist has produced works of true artistic excellence. He or she will never accept government funding. (E) A contemporary work of art that does not reflect the independent artistic conscience of the artist cannot be a work of true artistic excellence. Here the assumption should be something which strengthens the argument of the author that a government-funded artwork can never reflect the independent artistic conscience of the artist because artists, like anyone else who accepts financial support. Will inevitably try to please those who control the distribution of that support.Point E rightly reinforces the same point .Hence E.
_________________
+1 if you like my explanation .Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 08 Jul 2008
Posts: 151
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
2
[0], given: 0
|
Re: The stated goal of the government's funding program for the [#permalink]
26 Jan 2012, 00:20
+1 E
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 28 Feb 2011
Posts: 58
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
10
[0], given: 18
|
Re: The stated goal of the government's funding program for the [#permalink]
03 Feb 2012, 05:55
crackgmat3 wrote: 7. The stated goal of the government's funding program for the arts is to encourage the creation of works of artistic excellence. Senator Beton claims. However, that a government-funded artwork can never reflect the independent artistic conscience of the artist because artists, like anyone else who accepts financial support. Will inevitably try to please those who control the distribution of that support. Senator Beton concludes that government funding of the arts not only is a burden on taxpayers but also cannot lead to the creation of works of true artistic excellence.
Which one of the following is an assumption on which Senator Beton's argument is based?
(A) Most taxpayers have little or no interest in the creation of works of true artistic excellence. (B) Government funding of the arts is more generous than other financial support most artists receive. (C) Distribution of government funds for the arts is based on a broad agreement as to what constitutes artistic excellence. (D) Once an artist has produced works of true artistic excellence. He or she will never accept government funding. (E) A contemporary work of art that does not reflect the independent artistic conscience of the artist cannot be a work of true artistic excellence. Conclusion : govt funding of artwork is a burden on taxpayer as well as cannot lead to creation of true artistic excellence work premise : funded work doesn't represent the independent artistic conscience of artist An assumption should bridge the GAP between premise and conclusion therefore our assumption should relate independent artistic conscience with true artistic excellence, thus IMO answer is E
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: The stated goal of the government's funding program for the
[#permalink]
03 Feb 2012, 05:55
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderators:
metallicafan, rajeevrks27, souvik101990, PTK, MacFauz, noboru, kissthegmat, carcass, willigetmylifeback, mikemcgarry, doe007, Vercules, Legendaddy, tuanquang269, RaviChandra, Marcab, Narenn
|