Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

Re: Good set of DS 3 [#permalink]
26 Nov 2012, 01:40

Expert's post

Amateur wrote:

Bunuel wrote:

ANSWERS: 2. Is a product of three integers XYZ a prime? (1) X=-Y (2) Z=1

(1) x=-y --> for xyz to be a prime z must be -p AND x=-y shouldn't be zero. Not sufficient. (2) z=1 --> Not sufficient. (1)+(2) x=-y and z=1 --> x and y can be zero, xyz=0 not prime OR xyz is negative, so not prime. In either case we know xyz not prime.

Answer: C

i did not understand the explanation you gave..... a prime is a number which is divisible by 1 and itself right? if x,y,z are three integers..... and for it to be prime.... two for those three integers should be 1 or -1 or 1,-1.... so the third one be prime number or negative prime number.... (1) says two of them are equal in magnitude... so z can be -p to be prime or negative composite number or positive non prime in either case not sufficient... (2) z=1 nothing said about x,y..... not sufficient

(1) + (2) product will be a positive or negative composite number or 1..... so not a prime which is sufficient.... am i thinking correctly?

We have that \(x=-y\) and \(z=1\), thus \(xyz=-x^2\). Now, \(-x^2\leq{0}\), thus it cannot be a prime number (only positive numbers are primes).

Re: The sum of n consecutive positive integers is 45 [#permalink]
06 Jan 2013, 03:24

Q Is a product of three integers XYZ a prime? (1) X=-Y (2) Z=1

I'm unable to understand why (1) X=-Y is not sufficient to answer the question?

In all cases if (1) X=-Y, XYZ can not be a prime number, whether X, Y being 0 or Z being negative. I may be missing out something very basic, please help.

Re: The sum of n consecutive positive integers is 45 [#permalink]
07 Jan 2013, 03:20

1

This post received KUDOS

Expert's post

pashraddha wrote:

Q Is a product of three integers XYZ a prime? (1) X=-Y (2) Z=1

I'm unable to understand why (1) X=-Y is not sufficient to answer the question?

In all cases if (1) X=-Y, XYZ can not be a prime number, whether X, Y being 0 or Z being negative. I may be missing out something very basic, please help.

If \(x=-1\), \(y=1\), \(z=-7\), then \(xyz=(-1)*1*(-7)=7=prime\).

Re: The sum of n consecutive positive integers is 45 [#permalink]
13 Sep 2013, 06:32

Hi Bunnel, Can you please explain Q3

(1) wx+cx=aaa (111, 222, ... 999=37*k) --> As x is the units digit in both numbers, a can be 1,4,6 or 9 (2,3,7 out because x^2 can not end with 2,3, or 7. 5 is out because in that case x also should be 5 and we know that x and a are distinct numbers). 1 is also out because 111=37*3 and we need 2 two digit numbers. 444=37*12 no good we need units digit to be the same. 666=37*18 no good we need units digit to be the same. 999=37*27 is the only possibility all digits are distinct except the unit digits of multiples.

Re: The sum of n consecutive positive integers is 45 [#permalink]
13 Sep 2013, 07:47

Expert's post

GMAT40 wrote:

Hi Bunnel, Can you please explain Q3

(1) wx+cx=aaa (111, 222, ... 999=37*k) --> As x is the units digit in both numbers, a can be 1,4,6 or 9 (2,3,7 out because x^2 can not end with 2,3, or 7. 5 is out because in that case x also should be 5 and we know that x and a are distinct numbers). 1 is also out because 111=37*3 and we need 2 two digit numbers. 444=37*12 no good we need units digit to be the same. 666=37*18 no good we need units digit to be the same. 999=37*27 is the only possibility all digits are distinct except the unit digits of multiples.

Can you please elaborate your question? Thank you. _________________

Re: The sum of n consecutive positive integers is 45 [#permalink]
13 Sep 2013, 09:13

Bunuel wrote:

GMAT40 wrote:

Hi Bunnel, Can you please explain Q3

(1) wx+cx=aaa (111, 222, ... 999=37*k) --> As x is the units digit in both numbers, a can be 1,4,6 or 9 (2,3,7 out because x^2 can not end with 2,3, or 7. 5 is out because in that case x also should be 5 and we know that x and a are distinct numbers). 1 is also out because 111=37*3 and we need 2 two digit numbers. 444=37*12 no good we need units digit to be the same. 666=37*18 no good we need units digit to be the same. 999=37*27 is the only possibility all digits are distinct except the unit digits of multiples.

Can you please elaborate your question? Thank you.

My question was how did you arrive at 37 * K and how did you rule out 2, 3, 7

going thru your solution once again i could understand this but had already posted my query

Re: The sum of n consecutive positive integers is 45 [#permalink]
22 Nov 2013, 09:20

I had a problem with number 8 and 9 8 Why is statement 2 not sufficient? I mean |x| means positive x so cant we then arrange it as |x|-|y|=16 Same as x-y=16 then use substitution method with the equation |x|+|y|=32 above? 9 You mentioned that “when odd number n is doubleb, 2n has twice as many factors as n” Is this always the case? Let’s say our odd number is 15 ,it has four factors 5 ,1,15and 3.when doubled it becomes 30.30 has 30,1,2,3,5 factors. Just one more factor than 15. My understanding for YES/NO DS question is that a statement is sufficient only if it satisfies the question always.

Re: The sum of n consecutive positive integers is 45 [#permalink]
26 Nov 2013, 07:35

Expert's post

mumbijoh wrote:

I had a problem with number 8 and 9 8 Why is statement 2 not sufficient? I mean |x| means positive x so cant we then arrange it as |x|-|y|=16 Same as x-y=16 then use substitution method with the equation |x|+|y|=32 above? 9 You mentioned that “when odd number n is doubleb, 2n has twice as many factors as n” Is this always the case? Let’s say our odd number is 15 ,it has four factors 5 ,1,15and 3.when doubled it becomes 30.30 has 30,1,2,3,5 factors. Just one more factor than 15. My understanding for YES/NO DS question is that a statement is sufficient only if it satisfies the question always.

Re: The sum of n consecutive positive integers is 45 [#permalink]
18 Apr 2014, 06:16

Bunuel wrote:

Multiplication of the two digit numbers wx and cx, where w,x and c are unique non-zero digits, the product is a three digit number. What is w+c-x? (1) The three digits of the product are all the same and different from w c and x. (2) x and w+c are odd numbers.

(1) wx+cx=aaa (111, 222, ... 999=37*k) --> As x is the units digit in both numbers, a can be 1,4,6 or 9 (2,3,7 out because x^2 can not end with 2,3, or 7. 5 is out because in that case x also should be 5 and we know that x and a are distinct numbers). 1 is also out because 111=37*3 and we need 2 two digit numbers. 444=37*12 no good we need units digit to be the same. 666=37*18 no good we need units digit to be the same. 999=37*27 is the only possibility all digits are distinct except the unit digits of multiples. Sufficient (2) x and w+c are odd numbers. Number of choices: 13 and 23 or 19 and 29 and w+c-x is the different even number.

Answer: A.

am I missing anything? it does not say that w x and c are positive, does it? w= 3, c= 2 and x= 7 37*27 = 999, here w+c -7 = -2

but we also can have w= -3 and c= -2 and x= 7 -37*-27 = 999, here w+c - 7 = -12

Both of these sets satisfy both the conditions , hence I am getting E,

Re: The sum of n consecutive positive integers is 45 [#permalink]
18 Apr 2014, 10:12

Expert's post

qlx wrote:

Bunuel wrote:

Multiplication of the two digit numbers wx and cx, where w,x and c are unique non-zero digits, the product is a three digit number. What is w+c-x? (1) The three digits of the product are all the same and different from w c and x. (2) x and w+c are odd numbers.

(1) wx+cx=aaa (111, 222, ... 999=37*k) --> As x is the units digit in both numbers, a can be 1,4,6 or 9 (2,3,7 out because x^2 can not end with 2,3, or 7. 5 is out because in that case x also should be 5 and we know that x and a are distinct numbers). 1 is also out because 111=37*3 and we need 2 two digit numbers. 444=37*12 no good we need units digit to be the same. 666=37*18 no good we need units digit to be the same. 999=37*27 is the only possibility all digits are distinct except the unit digits of multiples. Sufficient (2) x and w+c are odd numbers. Number of choices: 13 and 23 or 19 and 29 and w+c-x is the different even number.

Answer: A.

am I missing anything? it does not say that w x and c are positive, does it? w= 3, c= 2 and x= 7 37*27 = 999, here w+c -7 = -2

but we also can have w= -3 and c= -2 and x= 7 -37*-27 = 999, here w+c - 7 = -12

Both of these sets satisfy both the conditions , hence I am getting E,

w, x and c are unique non-zero digits of the two digit numbers wx and cx means that w, x, and c are 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, or 9.

Re: The sum of n consecutive positive integers is 45 [#permalink]
24 Apr 2014, 02:08

Bunuel wrote:

qlx wrote:

Bunuel wrote:

Multiplication of the two digit numbers wx and cx, where w,x and c are unique non-zero digits, the product is a three digit number. What is w+c-x? (1) The three digits of the product are all the same and different from w c and x. (2) x and w+c are odd numbers.

(1) wx+cx=aaa (111, 222, ... 999=37*k) --> As x is the units digit in both numbers, a can be 1,4,6 or 9 (2,3,7 out because x^2 can not end with 2,3, or 7. 5 is out because in that case x also should be 5 and we know that x and a are distinct numbers). 1 is also out because 111=37*3 and we need 2 two digit numbers. 444=37*12 no good we need units digit to be the same. 666=37*18 no good we need units digit to be the same. 999=37*27 is the only possibility all digits are distinct except the unit digits of multiples. Sufficient (2) x and w+c are odd numbers. Number of choices: 13 and 23 or 19 and 29 and w+c-x is the different even number.

Answer: A.

am I missing anything? it does not say that w x and c are positive, does it? w= 3, c= 2 and x= 7 37*27 = 999, here w+c -7 = -2

but we also can have w= -3 and c= -2 and x= 7 -37*-27 = 999, here w+c - 7 = -12

Both of these sets satisfy both the conditions , hence I am getting E,

w, x and c are unique non-zero digits of the two digit numbers wx and cx means that w, x, and c are 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, or 9.

Hope it's clear.

Thank you for your reply Sorry for the delayed post, but couldn't it be better if it was mentioned that w, c, x are non zero positive integers?

"w, x and c are unique non-zero digits of the two digit numbers wx and cx" - From this statement how can we deduce or assume that the 2 digit number cannot be negative ?

As of now one could argue wx = -37 and cx = -27 is also a possibility. here I have taken w = -3 and x= 7 and c= -2

Re: The sum of n consecutive positive integers is 45 [#permalink]
24 Apr 2014, 02:14

Expert's post

qlx wrote:

Bunuel wrote:

qlx wrote:

w, x and c are unique non-zero digits of the two digit numbers wx and cx means that w, x, and c are 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, or 9.

Hope it's clear.

Thank you for your reply Sorry for the delayed post, but couldn't it be better if it was mentioned that w, c, x are non zero positive integers?

"w, x and c are unique non-zero digits of the two digit numbers wx and cx" - From this statement how can we deduce or assume that the 2 digit number cannot be negative ?

As of now one could argue wx = -37 and cx = -27 is also a possibility. here I have taken w = -3 and x= 7 and c= -2

Hope you agree.

Thank you and appreciate your help.

Two-digit numbers wx means positive integer, where w is the tens digit and x is the units digit: 10, 11, 12, ..., 99.

Two-digit numbers -wx means negative integer, where w is the tens digit and x is the units digit: -10, -11, -12, ..., -99. _________________

Re: The sum of n consecutive positive integers is 45 [#permalink]
24 Apr 2014, 02:44

Bunuel wrote:

Two-digit numbers wx means positive integer, where w is the tens digit and x is the units digit: 10, 11, 12, ..., 99.

Two-digit numbers -wx means negative integer, where w is the tens digit and x is the units digit: -10, -11, -12, ..., -99.

Thank you I finally got what you are saying.

I think a variable representing an integer can be positive or negative ( or zero) , a variable without a minus sign does not mean that the variable is positive does it .

using the same logic if a particular sum says

if a and b are integers what is b ?

1) a+b = 1 2) a= 2

From here can we say that a is positive ,because it is not -a ? so a means = a is a positive integer and -a means = a is a negative integer

In the same way when it says wx is a two digit integer , how can we say because it is not -wx hence wx is positive.

Last edited by qlx on 24 Apr 2014, 03:09, edited 1 time in total.

Re: The sum of n consecutive positive integers is 45 [#permalink]
24 Apr 2014, 02:57

1

This post received KUDOS

Expert's post

qlx wrote:

Bunuel wrote:

Two-digit numbers wx means positive integer, where w is the tens digit and x is the units digit: 10, 11, 12, ..., 99.

Two-digit numbers -wx means negative integer, where w is the tens digit and x is the units digit: -10, -11, -12, ..., -99.

Thank you I finally got what you are saying.

I think a variable representing an integer can be positive or negative , a variable without a minus sign does not mean that the variable is positive does it .

using the same logic if a particular sum says

if a and b are integers what is b ?

1) a+b = 1 2) a= 2

From here can we say that a is positive ,because it is not -a ? so a means = a is a positive integer and -a means = a is a negative integer

In the same way when it says wx is a two digit integer , how can we say because it is not -wx hence wx is positive.

a is an integer does not mean that a is positive but a is a digit means that a is positive: 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, or 9.

Sorry cannot explain any better. _________________

Re: The sum of n consecutive positive integers is 45 [#permalink]
24 Apr 2014, 03:27

Bunuel wrote:

qlx wrote:

Bunuel wrote:

Two-digit numbers wx means positive integer, where w is the tens digit and x is the units digit: 10, 11, 12, ..., 99.

Two-digit numbers -wx means negative integer, where w is the tens digit and x is the units digit: -10, -11, -12, ..., -99.

Thank you I finally got what you are saying.

I think a variable representing an integer can be positive or negative , a variable without a minus sign does not mean that the variable is positive does it .

using the same logic if a particular sum says

if a and b are integers what is b ?

1) a+b = 1 2) a= 2

From here can we say that a is positive ,because it is not -a ? so a means = a is a positive integer and -a means = a is a negative integer

In the same way when it says wx is a two digit integer , how can we say because it is not -wx hence wx is positive.

a is an integer does not mean that a is positive but a is a digit means that a is positive: 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, or 9.

Sorry cannot explain any better.

Thank you for your explanation ,

So the terms " Integer" and " Digit " makes all the difference ?They do not mean the same thing, right?

Integer =both negative , positive or zero Digit = only 0 or positive.

I thought ( -2) was a digit too! a negative digit? Can we not have a negative digit?

Or is the Digit term in GMAT only used for non negative integers.

Re: The sum of n consecutive positive integers is 45 [#permalink]
01 May 2014, 21:29

2

This post received KUDOS

Expert's post

qlx wrote:

So the terms " Integer" and " Digit " makes all the difference ?They do not mean the same thing, right?

Integer =both negative , positive or zero Digit = only 0 or positive.

I thought ( -2) was a digit too! a negative digit? Can we not have a negative digit?

Or is the Digit term in GMAT only used for non negative integers.

I think this is important info in terms of Gmat.

Really appreciate your help.Thank you so much .

Responding to a pm: Here goes my honest opinion you asked for!

An integer can be positive, negative or 0.

A single digit, on the other hand always implies a positive single digit from 0 to 9. Given ab where a and b are single digits, ab is a positive integer.

In the question, you have "Multiplication of the two digit numbers wx and cx, where w,x and c are unique non-zero digits, the product is a three digit number". This implies that w, c and x are distinct digits from 1 to 9 and wx and cx are positive integers.

The author did not forget to mention "positive digits". He/she did not need to mention it because digits imply positive digits only.

Also, in case of confusion, you can always search on Google. Say, put "digit in Math" and check out the various write ups. If there are multiple usages, the net will tell you that too. _________________

Re: The sum of n consecutive positive integers is 45 [#permalink]
04 May 2014, 06:15

Hi bunnel

8. If x and y are non-zero integers and |x| + |y| = 32, what is xy? (1) -4x - 12y = 0 (2) |x| - |y| = 16

(1) x+3y=0 --> x and y have opposite signs --> either 4y=32 y=8 x=-3, xy=-24 OR -4y=32 y=-8 x=3 xy=24. The same answer. Sufficient..... how is x = -3, when y = 8?... isnt x=-3y?? (2) Multiple choices. Not sufficient. _________________

Hope to clear it this time!! GMAT 1: 540 Preparing again

Re: The sum of n consecutive positive integers is 45 [#permalink]
04 May 2014, 06:47

Expert's post

nandinigaur wrote:

Hi bunnel

8. If x and y are non-zero integers and |x| + |y| = 32, what is xy? (1) -4x - 12y = 0 (2) |x| - |y| = 16

(1) x+3y=0 --> x and y have opposite signs --> either 4y=32 y=8 x=-3, xy=-24 OR -4y=32 y=-8 x=3 xy=24. The same answer. Sufficient..... how is x = -3, when y = 8?... isnt x=-3y?? (2) Multiple choices. Not sufficient.

There was a typo. Correct solution is below:

If x and y are non-zero integers and |x| + |y| = 32, what is xy?

(1) \(-4x-12y=0\) --> \(x=-3y\) --> \(x\) and \(y\) have opposite signs.

So either: \(|x|=x\) and \(|y|=-y\) --> in this case \(|x|+|y|=x-y=-3y-y=-4y=32\): \(y=-8\), \(x=24\), \(xy=-24*8\);

OR: \(|x|=-x\) and \(|y|=y\) --> \(|x|+|y|=-x+y=3y+y=4y=32\) --> \(y=8\) and \(x=-24\) --> \(xy=-24*8\), the same answer.

Sufficient.

(2) \(|x| - |y| = 16\). Sum this one with th equations given in the stem --> \(2|x|=48\) --> \(|x|=24\), \(|y|=8\). \(xy=-24*8\) (x and y have opposite sign) or \(xy=24*8\) (x and y have the same sign). Multiple choices. Not sufficient.

Re: The sum of n consecutive positive integers is 45 [#permalink]
04 May 2014, 09:21

Hi bunnel

The sum of n consecutive positive integers is 45. What is the value of n? (1) n is odd (2) n >= 9

in this qs... i have got confused... for st 1:

1 got several values of n therefore insufficient.

but in statement 2 what does your explanation mean by: max for n is 9: 1+2+3+...+9=45. (If n>9=10 first term must be zero. and we are given that all terms are positive) So only case n=9.? how do you know its the some of exactly 9 consecutive numbers? _________________

Hope to clear it this time!! GMAT 1: 540 Preparing again

Re: The sum of n consecutive positive integers is 45 [#permalink]
04 May 2014, 10:01

Expert's post

nandinigaur wrote:

Hi bunnel

The sum of n consecutive positive integers is 45. What is the value of n? (1) n is odd (2) n >= 9

in this qs... i have got confused... for st 1:

1 got several values of n therefore insufficient.

but in statement 2 what does your explanation mean by: max for n is 9: 1+2+3+...+9=45. (If n>9=10 first term must be zero. and we are given that all terms are positive) So only case n=9.? how do you know its the some of exactly 9 consecutive numbers?

Because the least sum of 10 consecutive positive integers is 1+2+3+4+5+6+7+8+9+10=55. _________________

Low GPA MBA Acceptance Rate Analysis Many applicants worry about applying to business school if they have a low GPA. I analyzed the low GPA MBA acceptance rate at...

Every student has a predefined notion about a MBA degree:- hefty packages, good job opportunities, improvement in position and salaries but how many really know the journey of becoming...