Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 30 Jul 2015, 02:18
GMAT Club Tests

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

The Supreme Court's concern with legitimacy is not for the

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 31 May 2006
Posts: 381
Location: Phoenix AZ
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 0

The Supreme Court's concern with legitimacy is not for the [#permalink] New post 12 Aug 2006, 11:45
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

13% (01:19) correct 88% (00:25) wrong based on 9 sessions
The Supreme Court's concern with legitimacy is not for the sake of the court but the nation to which it is responsible.

(A) but the nation to which it is responsible
(B) but for the sake of the nation to which it is responsible
(C) so much as the nation it is responsible to
(D) as the nation it is responsible to
(E) but the nation

Key idea that i remembered and tried to apply = possessive poison.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 14 Jul 2005
Posts: 402
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 12 Aug 2006, 12:12
B seems correct here...

is not for the sake of the court but for the sake of the nation to which it is responsible
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 14 May 2006
Posts: 1418
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 68 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 12 Aug 2006, 17:40
I will go with E and ellipsis


The Supreme Court’s concern with legitimacy is not for the sake of the court but [for the sake of] the nation

B looks good except for "IT"... what is it referring to??? sake or concern?
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 31 May 2006
Posts: 381
Location: Phoenix AZ
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 12 Aug 2006, 17:44
u2lover wrote:
I will go with E and ellipsis


The Supreme Court’s concern with legitimacy is not for the sake of the court but [for the sake of] the nation

B looks good except for "IT"... what is it referring to??? sake or concern?


That is exactly what i thought. However, the answer is B.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 26 Jun 2006
Posts: 445
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 26 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 12 Aug 2006, 17:55
u2lover, I think it should be (B) only.
Pattern : not for X but for Y is idiomatic.
_________________

http://mba2010dreams.blogspot.com

CEO
CEO
User avatar
Joined: 20 Nov 2005
Posts: 2910
Schools: Completed at SAID BUSINESS SCHOOL, OXFORD - Class of 2008
Followers: 19

Kudos [?]: 140 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 12 Aug 2006, 18:27
u2lover wrote:
I will go with E and ellipsis


The Supreme Court’s concern with legitimacy is not for the sake of the court but [for the sake of] the nation

B looks good except for "IT"... what is it referring to??? sake or concern?

"it" is referring to court. Try putting "sake" or "concern" in place of "it" and sentence doesn't make sense.

It must be B.
_________________

SAID BUSINESS SCHOOL, OXFORD - MBA CLASS OF 2008

Current Student
User avatar
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Posts: 5240
Followers: 23

Kudos [?]: 198 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 13 Aug 2006, 01:27
Not for the sake of X but for the sake of Y~ idiomatic

Can`t use ellipsis here, unless the sentence were stated as follows:

The Supreme Court’s concern with legitimacy is not for the sake of the court but for the sake of the nation.

(B)

:45
SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 30 Mar 2006
Posts: 1737
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 46 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 13 Aug 2006, 22:34
Will go with B too.

IMO ellipis doesnot apply here.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 31 May 2006
Posts: 381
Location: Phoenix AZ
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 13 Aug 2006, 22:56
jaynayak wrote:
Will go with B too.

IMO ellipis doesnot apply here.


What is ellipis? :?: :roll:
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 18 Jul 2006
Posts: 531
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 32 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 13 Aug 2006, 23:22
B for parallel construction.

Ellipsis:- http://www.answers.com/topic/ellipsis
Current Student
User avatar
Status: Nothing comes easy: neither do I want.
Joined: 12 Oct 2009
Posts: 2799
Location: Malaysia
Concentration: Technology, Entrepreneurship
Schools: ISB '15 (M)
GMAT 1: 670 Q49 V31
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V35
Followers: 198

Kudos [?]: 1183 [0], given: 235

Reviews Badge
Re: [#permalink] New post 16 Sep 2010, 00:35
ps_dahiya wrote:
u2lover wrote:
I will go with E and ellipsis


The Supreme Court's concern with legitimacy is not for the sake of the court but [for the sake of] the nation

B looks good except for "IT"... what is it referring to??? sake or concern?

"it" is referring to court. Try putting "sake" or "concern" in place of "it" and sentence doesn't make sense.

It must be B.


IMO It can not refer to supreme court's concern, as the subject is not supreme court but supreme court's concern.
_________________

Fight for your dreams :For all those who fear from Verbal- lets give it a fight

Money Saved is the Money Earned :)

Jo Bole So Nihaal , Sat Shri Akaal

:thanks Support GMAT Club by putting a GMAT Club badge on your blog/Facebook :thanks

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Gmat test review :
670-to-710-a-long-journey-without-destination-still-happy-141642.html

Retired Moderator
User avatar
Status: I wish!
Joined: 21 May 2010
Posts: 788
Followers: 109

Kudos [?]: 306 [0], given: 33

Re: sc -- supreme court [#permalink] New post 16 Sep 2010, 02:33
IMO "IT" has proper antecedent, Trying using other possible antecedent and check the sentence whether sentence makes sense. "IT" can't refer back to the other possible antecedents such as Sake, Nation or Concern.

Yes, for more detail check "Supernova" example given by MGMAT on page no. 70 (ed-4th)

The Supreme Court's concern with legitimacy is not for the sake of the court but FOR the nation to which it is responsible.

Also, this question is taken from http://www.stjohns.edu/media/3/f8f413fd ... d15f19.pdf
_________________

http://drambedkarbooks.com/

Current Student
User avatar
Status: Nothing comes easy: neither do I want.
Joined: 12 Oct 2009
Posts: 2799
Location: Malaysia
Concentration: Technology, Entrepreneurship
Schools: ISB '15 (M)
GMAT 1: 670 Q49 V31
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V35
Followers: 198

Kudos [?]: 1183 [0], given: 235

Reviews Badge
Re: sc -- supreme court [#permalink] New post 16 Sep 2010, 02:43
In the Mgmat guide it is supernovas not supernova's. Thus it is not relevant.
Check my previous post:
It can not refer to supreme court's concern, as the subject is not supreme court but supreme court's concern.

Suppose you have 3 contenders for 'IT' and one of the contender is Apostrophe, but other 2 does not make sense. Can you conclude the Apostrophe is right?

Moreover my concern is not whether others make sense or not, but whether supreme court's concern could be used as antecedent for it?

The Supreme Court's concern with legitimacy is not for the sake of the court but for the sake of the nation to which supreme court's concern is responsible

I have replaced IT by supreme court's concern. Does this make sense?

I think the following is correct but it was not given in the answer choices.

The Supreme Court's concern with legitimacy is not for the sake of the court but for the sake of the nation to which supreme court is responsible
_________________

Fight for your dreams :For all those who fear from Verbal- lets give it a fight

Money Saved is the Money Earned :)

Jo Bole So Nihaal , Sat Shri Akaal

:thanks Support GMAT Club by putting a GMAT Club badge on your blog/Facebook :thanks

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Gmat test review :
670-to-710-a-long-journey-without-destination-still-happy-141642.html

Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
User avatar
Status: mission completed!
Joined: 02 Jul 2009
Posts: 1420
GPA: 3.77
Followers: 172

Kudos [?]: 658 [0], given: 618

GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: sc -- supreme court [#permalink] New post 08 Aug 2011, 05:07
this is an example of BAD question in 1000 series.
Avoid it, since it does not teaches you.
_________________

Audaces fortuna juvat!

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Expert Post
1 KUDOS received
Retired Moderator
avatar
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 2354
Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Followers: 332

Kudos [?]: 2442 [1] , given: 261

Re: sc -- supreme court [#permalink] New post 08 Aug 2011, 06:09
1
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
Look at the following; This one is from Manhattan’s Ron;

“'m pleased to announce that we are strongly considering eliminating altogether the coverage of "possessive poison" in the next forthcoming edition of our strategy guide.
while this rule has been mentioned in the answer keys to one or two official problems, it has never been dispositive in even a single problem, and it has caused confusion vastly outdoing its usefulness for a great number of students”

http://www.manhattangmat.com/forums/pro ... t9533.html

I think we can ignore the possessiveness of an antecedent as long as it is referring only to that particular referent. We might rather look at other issues
_________________

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Retired Moderator
User avatar
Status: 2000 posts! I don't know whether I should feel great or sad about it! LOL
Joined: 04 Oct 2009
Posts: 1720
Location: Peru
Schools: Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, MIT & HKS (Government)
WE 1: Economic research
WE 2: Banking
WE 3: Government: Foreign Trade and SMEs
Followers: 79

Kudos [?]: 482 [0], given: 109

Re: sc -- supreme court [#permalink] New post 10 Aug 2011, 08:51
+1 B

It requires parallelism:
not FOR...but FOR...
_________________

"Life’s battle doesn’t always go to stronger or faster men; but sooner or later the man who wins is the one who thinks he can."

My Integrated Reasoning Logbook / Diary: my-ir-logbook-diary-133264.html

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 20 Nov 2010
Posts: 226
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 38

Re: sc -- supreme court [#permalink] New post 10 Aug 2011, 10:03
Thanks Daagh, but "possessive poison" helps in elimination of wrong answer choices.
_________________

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
MGMAT 6 650 (51,31) on 31/8/11
MGMAT 1 670 (48,33) on 04/9/11
MGMAT 2 670 (47,34) on 07/9/11
MGMAT 3 680 (47,35) on 18/9/11
GMAT Prep1 680 ( 50, 31) on 10/11/11

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
CR notes
http://gmatclub.com/forum/massive-collection-of-verbal-questions-sc-rc-and-cr-106195.html#p832142
http://gmatclub.com/forum/1001-ds-questions-file-106193.html#p832133
http://gmatclub.com/forum/gmat-prep-critical-reasoning-collection-106783.html
http://gmatclub.com/forum/how-to-get-6-0-awa-my-guide-64327.html
http://gmatclub.com/forum/how-to-get-6-0-awa-my-guide-64327.html?hilit=chineseburned

Re: sc -- supreme court   [#permalink] 10 Aug 2011, 10:03
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
1 Because the Supreme Court has ruled that dqtuan9627 0 07 May 2014, 18:28
1 The Supreme Courts concern with legitimacy is not for the vivektripathi 2 25 Dec 2008, 04:55
The Supreme Courts concern with legitimacy is not for the querio 17 19 Apr 2007, 21:30
The Supreme Courts concern with legitimacy is not for the ash82 12 24 Sep 2006, 10:58
According to a ruling by the state supreme court, the owner ywilfred 2 02 Sep 2005, 05:16
Display posts from previous: Sort by

The Supreme Court's concern with legitimacy is not for the

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.