Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!
Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club
Registration gives you:
Tests
Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.
Applicant Stats
View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more
Books/Downloads
Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
The table above shows the amount of waste material, in tons [#permalink]
01 Nov 2009, 12:13
1
This post received KUDOS
2
This post was BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E
Difficulty:
45% (medium)
Question Stats:
63% (02:28) correct
38% (01:37) wrong based on 342 sessions
Country ---Amount Recycled---------Amount Disposed of A------------16,700-------------------- 142,800
B-------------8,800----------------------48,000
C------------13,000----------------------51,400
D-------------3,900----------------------20,300
E-------------3,300----------------------16,200
The table above shows the amount of waste material, in tons, recycled by each of five counties in a single year and the amount of waste material, also in tons, that was disposed of in landfills by the five counties in that year. Which county had the lowest ratio of waste material disposed of to waste material recycled in the year reported in the table?
"If you want my advice, Peter," he said at last, "you've made a mistake already. By asking me. By asking anyone. Never ask people. Not about your work. Don't you know what you want? How can you stand it, not to know?" Ayn Rand
Country ---Amount Recycled---------Amount Disposed of A------------16,700-------------------- 142,800
B-------------8,800----------------------48,000
C------------13,000----------------------51,400
D-------------3,900----------------------20,300
E-------------3,300----------------------16,200
The table above shows the amount of waste material, in tons, recycled by each of five counties in a single year and the amount of waste material, also in tons, that was disposed of in landfills by the five counties in that year. Which county had the lowest ratio of waste material disposed of to waste material recycled in the year reported in the table? A. A B. B C. C D. D E. E
Question asks to determine lowest ratio of amount disposed / amount recycled.
(A) 142,800 / 16,700 = ~ 8 - 9
(B) 48,000 / 8,800 = ~ 6
(C) 51,400 / 13,000 = ~4
(D) 20,300 / 3,900 = ~ 5
(E) 16,200 / 3,300 = ~ 5
Answer: C.
My advice is before doing calculations estimate the numbers and start with the easiest. No need for exact numerical values, so good approximation will work in this case. _________________
Re: The table above shows the amount of waste material, in tons [#permalink]
03 Sep 2013, 05:13
Hello members,
Since the purpose of this question is to practise estimation, I will explain here an interesting way. Start by multiplying denominator by 10 and see if numerator is greater than or less than denominator multiplied by 10. If numerator is less, half the (denominator*10) and see if it less or greater than the new numerator .
[162/33] , here 33x10=330, 330>162, 330/2=165, 165>162 (this means that numerator is around 4 times the denominator)
[203/39], here 39x10=390, 390>203, 390/2=195, 195<203 (this means that numerator is more than 5 times denominator)
[514/130], here 130x10=1300, 1300>514, 1300/2=650, 650 >514 (this means that numerator is less than 5 times and infact a little calculation will show that it is less than 4 times the numerator)
[480/88], here 88x10=880, 880>480, 880/2=440, 440<480 (this means that numerator is more than 5 times the denominator)
[1428/167], here 167x10=1670, 1670>1428, 1670/2=835, 835 < 1428 (this means that numerator is much more than 5 times the denominator)
By finding this strategy, we can see that [514][/130] yields the lowest fraction.
Re: The table above shows the amount of waste material, in tons [#permalink]
21 Jul 2014, 10:35
Hi all,
Could someone help me with the phrasing? The question asks for the lowest ratio ... yet the right aswer is the highest ratio. I mean for A: there is 9:1 ... 9 waste to 1 recycled for C: there is 3:1 ... 3 waste to 1 recycled
I would assume that the higher number (9/1=9; 3/1=3) would mean a lower ratio. If you try to make sense of the ratio than the ratio is high e.g. 1:2 or 1:10 etc... the higher the recycled part the higher the ratio is.
Re: The table above shows the amount of waste material, in tons [#permalink]
21 Jul 2014, 10:46
Expert's post
bigzoo wrote:
Hi all,
Could someone help me with the phrasing? The question asks for the lowest ratio ... yet the right aswer is the highest ratio. I mean for A: there is 9:1 ... 9 waste to 1 recycled for C: there is 3:1 ... 3 waste to 1 recycled
I would assume that the higher number (9/1=9; 3/1=3) would mean a lower ratio. If you try to make sense of the ratio than the ratio is high e.g. 1:2 or 1:10 etc... the higher the recycled part the higher the ratio is.
Re: The table above shows the amount of waste material, in tons [#permalink]
24 Sep 2015, 08:46
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!
Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).
Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email. _________________
As I’m halfway through my second year now, graduation is now rapidly approaching. I’ve neglected this blog in the last year, mainly because I felt I didn’...
Hilary Term has only started and we can feel the heat already. The two weeks have been packed with activities and submissions, giving a peek into what will follow...
Ninety-five percent of the Full-Time Class of 2015 received an offer by three months post-graduation, as reported today by Kellogg’s Career Management Center(CMC). Kellogg also saw an increase...