Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

The table above shows the amount of waste material, in tons [#permalink]

Show Tags

01 Nov 2009, 12:13

1

This post received KUDOS

4

This post was BOOKMARKED

00:00

A

B

C

D

E

Difficulty:

55% (hard)

Question Stats:

61% (02:24) correct
39% (01:36) wrong based on 450 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Country ---Amount Recycled---------Amount Disposed of A------------16,700-------------------- 142,800

B-------------8,800----------------------48,000

C------------13,000----------------------51,400

D-------------3,900----------------------20,300

E-------------3,300----------------------16,200

The table above shows the amount of waste material, in tons, recycled by each of five counties in a single year and the amount of waste material, also in tons, that was disposed of in landfills by the five counties in that year. Which county had the lowest ratio of waste material disposed of to waste material recycled in the year reported in the table?

"If you want my advice, Peter," he said at last, "you've made a mistake already. By asking me. By asking anyone. Never ask people. Not about your work. Don't you know what you want? How can you stand it, not to know?" Ayn Rand

Country ---Amount Recycled---------Amount Disposed of A------------16,700-------------------- 142,800

B-------------8,800----------------------48,000

C------------13,000----------------------51,400

D-------------3,900----------------------20,300

E-------------3,300----------------------16,200

The table above shows the amount of waste material, in tons, recycled by each of five counties in a single year and the amount of waste material, also in tons, that was disposed of in landfills by the five counties in that year. Which county had the lowest ratio of waste material disposed of to waste material recycled in the year reported in the table? A. A B. B C. C D. D E. E

Question asks to determine lowest ratio of amount disposed / amount recycled.

(A) 142,800 / 16,700 = ~ 8 - 9

(B) 48,000 / 8,800 = ~ 6

(C) 51,400 / 13,000 = ~4

(D) 20,300 / 3,900 = ~ 5

(E) 16,200 / 3,300 = ~ 5

Answer: C.

My advice is before doing calculations estimate the numbers and start with the easiest. No need for exact numerical values, so good approximation will work in this case.
_________________

Re: The table above shows the amount of waste material, in tons [#permalink]

Show Tags

03 Sep 2013, 05:13

1

This post was BOOKMARKED

Hello members,

Since the purpose of this question is to practise estimation, I will explain here an interesting way. Start by multiplying denominator by 10 and see if numerator is greater than or less than denominator multiplied by 10. If numerator is less, half the (denominator*10) and see if it less or greater than the new numerator .

[162/33] , here 33x10=330, 330>162, 330/2=165, 165>162 (this means that numerator is around 4 times the denominator)

[203/39], here 39x10=390, 390>203, 390/2=195, 195<203 (this means that numerator is more than 5 times denominator)

[514/130], here 130x10=1300, 1300>514, 1300/2=650, 650 >514 (this means that numerator is less than 5 times and infact a little calculation will show that it is less than 4 times the numerator)

[480/88], here 88x10=880, 880>480, 880/2=440, 440<480 (this means that numerator is more than 5 times the denominator)

[1428/167], here 167x10=1670, 1670>1428, 1670/2=835, 835 < 1428 (this means that numerator is much more than 5 times the denominator)

By finding this strategy, we can see that [514][/130] yields the lowest fraction.

Re: The table above shows the amount of waste material, in tons [#permalink]

Show Tags

21 Jul 2014, 10:35

Hi all,

Could someone help me with the phrasing? The question asks for the lowest ratio ... yet the right aswer is the highest ratio. I mean for A: there is 9:1 ... 9 waste to 1 recycled for C: there is 3:1 ... 3 waste to 1 recycled

I would assume that the higher number (9/1=9; 3/1=3) would mean a lower ratio. If you try to make sense of the ratio than the ratio is high e.g. 1:2 or 1:10 etc... the higher the recycled part the higher the ratio is.

Could someone help me with the phrasing? The question asks for the lowest ratio ... yet the right aswer is the highest ratio. I mean for A: there is 9:1 ... 9 waste to 1 recycled for C: there is 3:1 ... 3 waste to 1 recycled

I would assume that the higher number (9/1=9; 3/1=3) would mean a lower ratio. If you try to make sense of the ratio than the ratio is high e.g. 1:2 or 1:10 etc... the higher the recycled part the higher the ratio is.

Re: The table above shows the amount of waste material, in tons [#permalink]

Show Tags

24 Sep 2015, 08:46

Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________

Happy New Year everyone! Before I get started on this post, and well, restarted on this blog in general, I wanted to mention something. For the past several months...

It’s quickly approaching two years since I last wrote anything on this blog. A lot has happened since then. When I last posted, I had just gotten back from...

Happy 2017! Here is another update, 7 months later. With this pace I might add only one more post before the end of the GSB! However, I promised that...

The words of John O’Donohue ring in my head every time I reflect on the transformative, euphoric, life-changing, demanding, emotional, and great year that 2016 was! The fourth to...