Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 19 Aug 2014, 21:19

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

The testmakers say this is an error. seen monkeys sleeping

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
Joined: 31 Dec 1969
Location: United States
Concentration: Marketing, Other
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V38
GMAT 2: 660 Q V
GPA: 3.64
WE: Accounting (Accounting)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 55 [0], given: 75942

The testmakers say this is an error. seen monkeys sleeping [#permalink] New post 20 May 2003, 19:33
The testmakers say this is an error.

seen monkeys sleeping on the branches, whose arms and legs hanging like socks on the clothesline.

Does whose refer wrongly to branches? I'm not sure as I am no grammar expert.
victor
Expert Post
Founder
Founder
User avatar
Affiliations: UA-1K, SPG-G, HH-D
Joined: 04 Dec 2002
Posts: 12062
Location: United States (WA)
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
GPA: 3.5
WE: Information Technology (Hospitality and Tourism)
Followers: 2218

Kudos [?]: 8157 [0], given: 3640

GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member CAT Tests
 [#permalink] New post 21 May 2003, 12:26
Expert's post
Victor, You are correct,

in the situation described above, whose is incorrectly modifying branches. Logically we understand that branches have no legs or arms, but gramatically they do.

I hope this helps. keep on knocking until you get the answer; it si better to get it now than after :wink:
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 25 May 2003
Posts: 54
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 26 May 2003, 23:51
is this also incorrect because "whose" can only be a pronoun for a group of persons, not objects such as branches? If so, what pronoun can one use?
Expert Post
Founder
Founder
User avatar
Affiliations: UA-1K, SPG-G, HH-D
Joined: 04 Dec 2002
Posts: 12062
Location: United States (WA)
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
GPA: 3.5
WE: Information Technology (Hospitality and Tourism)
Followers: 2218

Kudos [?]: 8157 [0], given: 3640

GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member CAT Tests
 [#permalink] New post 27 May 2003, 17:32
Expert's post
skoper wrote:
is this also incorrect because "whose" can only be a pronoun for a group of persons, not objects such as branches? If so, what pronoun can one use?



No, whose can be used with non-person items.

Here is what the dictionary has to say about this: Sometimes the phrase of which is used as the possessive of which: Chicago is a city of
which the attractions are many or Chicago is a
city the attractions of which are many. The use of
this phrase can often seem awkward or pretentious,
whereas WHOSE sounds more idiomatic: Chicago is a
city whose attractions are many.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 03 Aug 2006
Posts: 444
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 08 Oct 2006, 04:55
bb, thanks!

I am going back to the beginning of the Verbal Forum and reading all posts. I already learned something new within 5 mins. haha.

WHOSE: I thought it is used only for peron/people.
The chicago example is very good.
Current Student
User avatar
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Posts: 5253
Followers: 23

Kudos [?]: 126 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User Reviews Badge
 [#permalink] New post 08 Oct 2006, 05:28
died4me wrote:
bb, thanks!

I am going back to the beginning of the Verbal Forum and reading all posts. I already learned something new within 5 mins. haha.

WHOSE: I thought it is used only for peron/people.
The chicago example is very good.


Here's another coincidental "whose" pronoun SC that refers to Chicago. (taken from the set I posted earlier)

Chicago, whose industrial growth in the nineteenth century was more rapid than that of any other American city, was plagued by labor troubles like the Pullman Strikes of 1894.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 03 Aug 2006
Posts: 444
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 08 Oct 2006, 14:10
everyone kept saying that getting involved in the forum is the best way to learn.. I said "maybe for someone"

Now, I say "Yeah baby!"
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 25 Jun 2006
Posts: 1176
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 36 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 09 Oct 2006, 04:33
Good. I had doubt, but am clear now.
  [#permalink] 09 Oct 2006, 04:33
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
9 Sleeping Drivers RaviChandra 25 17 Apr 2010, 03:20
monkeys' antics rishi2377 14 29 Sep 2007, 05:59
MBA and Sleep GMATT73 43 22 Mar 2007, 08:02
The explanation provided by the test-makers is unclear to wshaffer 6 05 Nov 2006, 17:43
Usage: sleeping/asleep b14kumar 2 25 Dec 2005, 19:26
Display posts from previous: Sort by

The testmakers say this is an error. seen monkeys sleeping

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.