|
Author |
Message |
|
TAGS:
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 11 Sep 2005
Posts: 331
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
3
[0], given: 0
|
The three women, liberal activists who strongly support [#permalink]
14 Oct 2007, 05:20
Question Stats:
57% (01:39) correct
42% (00:39) wrong based on 4 sessions
The three women, liberal activists who strongly support legislation in favor of civil rights and environmental protection, have consistently received labor’s unqualifying support.(A) have consistently received labor’s unqualifying support (B) are consistently receiving the unqualifying support of labor (C) have consistently received the unqualified support of labor (D) receive consistent and unqualified support by labor (E) are receiving consistent and unqualified support by labor
Last edited by singh_amit19 on 14 Oct 2007, 06:39, edited 1 time in total.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 1082
Followers: 506
Kudos [?]:
1052
[3] , given: 131
|
Re: The three women, liberal activists who strongly support [#permalink]
11 Jan 2012, 09:32
3
This post received KUDOS
Hi, The three women, liberal activists who strongly support legislation in favor of civil rights and environmental protection, have consistently received labor's unqualifying support.  1. Generally, apostrophe “s” is used with living beings. It is better to avoid them if they are used with a non-living thing. However, this should not be followed as a rule. This is the matter of preference. For example: i. “the lion’s mane” is better than “the mane of the lion” ii. “the color of the shirt” is better than “the shirt’s color” Hence, “labor’s unqualifying support” is a very preferable expression. 2. “unqualifying” is no word at all. (Type it in the word document and you will see the red line appearing below it.) 3. Well, both the verb tenses “have received” and “are receiving” are correct. Per the original sentence, the women “have received” consistent support, meaning that they have been receiving the support for quite some time now. There are no solid reasons why it should be changed to “are receiving”. POE:Let us eliminate the answer choices based on more obvious errors in the sentence. (A) have consistently received labor’s unqualifying support: Wrong as discussed. (B) are consistently receiving the unqualifying support of labor: Wrong. “unqualifying” is ungrammatical. (C) have consistently received the unqualified support of labor: Correct answer. Per the context of the sentence, the word “unqualified” means “not modified, limited, or restricted in any way”. (D) receive consistent and unqualified support by labor: This choice distorts the meaning of the sentence. Also use of “by” is incorrect here. (E) are receiving consistent and unqualified support by labor: Same errors as in D. Notice that other answer choices can be eliminated for more obvious errors rather than the verb tense issue.  1. Avoid ungrammatical expressions. 2. Avoid answer choices that distort the meaning of the sentence. 3. Look for obvious errors in an answer choice to eliminate it. Thanks. Shraddha
_________________
Free trial:Click here to start free trial (100+ free practice questions) Free Session (May 25): : Learn how to master Sentence Correction. Click here to attend.
  
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 06 Aug 2007
Posts: 371
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
19
[1] , given: 0
|
Re: SC - SET 30 Q4 [#permalink]
14 Oct 2007, 10:06
1
This post received KUDOS
JingChan wrote: singh_amit19 wrote: The three women, liberal activists who strongly support legislation in favor of civil rights and environmental protection, have consistently received labor’s unqualifying support.
A. have consistently received labor’s unqualifying support B. are consistently receiving the unqualifying support of labor C. have consistently received the unqualified support of labor D. receive consistent and unqualified support by labor E. are receiving consistent and unqualified support by labor B - "are receiving support" "have received" implies they had it for something and may or may not have it anymore. not CDE: "unqualified support"
Have/Has + past participle (Received) - represents a going on action that began in the past and continues in the present.
Eg: Our country has enforced strict immigration laws for thirty years.
This sentence doesn't mean it happened in the past and it may or may not continue. Our country enforced strict immigration laws in the past and still enforces them today.
Hope that helps.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 26 Nov 2009
Posts: 180
Followers: 3
Kudos [?]:
49
[1] , given: 5
|
Re: SC - SET 30 Q4 [#permalink]
30 Dec 2009, 06:49
1
This post received KUDOS
I chose A but I am still confused with OA
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 11 Sep 2005
Posts: 331
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
3
[0], given: 0
|
I picked A, I donno why i am wrong.........please help!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 07 Sep 2007
Posts: 121
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
7
[0], given: 0
|
Re: SC - SET 30 Q4 [#permalink]
14 Oct 2007, 06:56
singh_amit19 wrote: The three women, liberal activists who strongly support legislation in favor of civil rights and environmental protection, have consistently received labor’s unqualifying support.
A. have consistently received labor’s unqualifying support B. are consistently receiving the unqualifying support of labor C. have consistently received the unqualified support of labor D. receive consistent and unqualified support by labor E. are receiving consistent and unqualified support by labor
B - "are receiving support"
"have received" implies they had it for something and may or may not have it anymore.
not CDE: "unqualified support"
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 11 Sep 2005
Posts: 331
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
3
[0], given: 0
|
OA is C
Please help me with explanations over here!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 28 Jun 2007
Posts: 322
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
6
[0], given: 0
|
Quote: The three women, liberal activists who strongly support legislation in favor of civil rights and environmental protection, have consistently received labor’s unqualifying support.
A. have consistently received labor’s unqualifying support B. are consistently receiving the unqualifying support of labor C. have consistently received the unqualified support of labor D. receive consistent and unqualified support by labor E. are receiving consistent and unqualified support by labor
I think the answer should be A. "have consistently received" is present perfect which indicates three women received labor's support in the past and they continue to do so even now.
B doesnt seem correct... there is no need for present participle here. This choice makes it sound like three women are receiving support right at this moment.
C is again present participle. But "received the unqualified support of labor" is passive. A is in active voice, hence my choice over C.
Last edited by gluon on 14 Oct 2007, 12:00, edited 3 times in total.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 11 Sep 2005
Posts: 331
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
3
[0], given: 0
|
gluon wrote: singh_amit19 wrote: OA is C
Please help me with explanations over here! Look at Spider's explanation above. Its right on money.
I am quite convinced that answer shud b between A & C......but y not possessive form i.e. labor’s unqualifying support instead of the unqualified support of labor
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 11 Sep 2005
Posts: 331
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
3
[0], given: 0
|
gluon wrote: I changed my mind.. see above.
I got one more on my side  ....thnkx man!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Joined: 26 Mar 2006
Posts: 647
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
12
[0], given: 0
|
Re: SC - SET 30 Q4 [#permalink]
14 Oct 2007, 18:37
singh_amit19 wrote: The three women, liberal activists who strongly support legislation in favor of civil rights and environmental protection, have consistently received labor’s unqualifying support.
A. have consistently received labor’s unqualifying support B. are consistently receiving the unqualifying support of labor C. have consistently received the unqualified support of labor D. receive consistent and unqualified support by labor E. are receiving consistent and unqualified support by labor
Between 'B' and 'C'
'B' - have is present plural so grammatically correct. But usage of adjective phrase unqualifying support should precede labor and not follow that.
Hence. agree with the OA - 'C'
|
|
|
|
|
|
CEO
Joined: 29 Mar 2007
Posts: 2618
Followers: 13
Kudos [?]:
142
[0], given: 0
|
Re: SC - SET 30 Q4 [#permalink]
14 Oct 2007, 18:44
singh_amit19 wrote: The three women, liberal activists who strongly support legislation in favor of civil rights and environmental protection, have consistently received labor’s unqualifying support.
A. have consistently received labor’s unqualifying support B. are consistently receiving the unqualifying support of labor C. have consistently received the unqualified support of labor D. receive consistent and unqualified support by labor E. are receiving consistent and unqualified support by labor
I have seen this one somewhere b/f. OA is correct.
possesive A does not win over C.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 05 Oct 2008
Posts: 284
Followers: 3
Kudos [?]:
18
[0], given: 22
|
Re: SC - SET 30 Q4 [#permalink]
27 Jan 2009, 06:30
Can someone please explain the difference between A & C.
Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
|
SVP
Joined: 17 Jun 2008
Posts: 1593
Followers: 7
Kudos [?]:
131
[0], given: 0
|
Re: SC - SET 30 Q4 [#permalink]
27 Jan 2009, 06:43
study wrote: Can someone please explain the difference between A & C.
Thanks I think it is "unqualifying support" instead of "unqualified support" that makes A a bad choice.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retired Moderator
Joined: 18 Jul 2008
Posts: 1003
Followers: 7
Kudos [?]:
40
[0], given: 5
|
Re: SC - SET 30 Q4 [#permalink]
10 Mar 2009, 16:32
Why is A better than C? I got this question on my GMAT PREP.
|
|
|
|
|
|
VP
Joined: 05 Jul 2008
Posts: 1442
Followers: 28
Kudos [?]:
152
[0], given: 1
|
Re: SC - SET 30 Q4 [#permalink]
11 Mar 2009, 15:59
bigfernhead wrote: Why is A better than C? I got this question on my GMAT PREP. Are you saying that GMAT Prep says that the OA is actually A and not C?
|
|
|
|
|
|
SVP
Joined: 07 Nov 2007
Posts: 1842
Location: New York
Followers: 20
Kudos [?]:
289
[0], given: 5
|
Re: SC - SET 30 Q4 [#permalink]
11 Mar 2009, 19:56
singh_amit19 wrote: The three women, liberal activists who strongly support legislation in favor of civil rights and environmental protection, have consistently received labor’s unqualifying support.
A. have consistently received labor’s unqualifying support B. are consistently receiving the unqualifying support of labor C. have consistently received the unqualified support of labor D. receive consistent and unqualified support by labor E. are receiving consistent and unqualified support by labor I will go with C. In A: labor's unqualifying support --> labor's <unqualifying support > --> which may mean that .. labor has "qualifying support" and "unqualifying support" and we are referring to labor's <unqualifying support> this doesn't make sense. it should be unqualifying/unqualified labor's support --> unqualified <support of labor> C is far better than A.
_________________
Your attitude determines your altitude Smiling wins more friends than frowning
|
|
|
|
|
|
VP
Joined: 18 May 2008
Posts: 1305
Followers: 9
Kudos [?]:
57
[0], given: 0
|
Re: SC - SET 30 Q4 [#permalink]
12 Mar 2009, 00:17
labor’s unqualifying support vs. unqualified support of labor
can sum 1 throw more light on this? i alw get confused in such situations
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retired Moderator
Joined: 18 Jul 2008
Posts: 1003
Followers: 7
Kudos [?]:
40
[0], given: 5
|
Re: SC - SET 30 Q4 [#permalink]
12 Mar 2009, 06:17
Sorry for the confusion. C is the OA. icandy wrote: bigfernhead wrote: Why is A better than C? I got this question on my GMAT PREP. Are you saying that GMAT Prep says that the OA is actually A and not C?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 02 Mar 2009
Posts: 139
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
24
[0], given: 0
|
Re: SC - SET 30 Q4 [#permalink]
12 Mar 2009, 09:56
Definately C
The emphasis is more on the quality here, hence 'the unqualified support of labour' conveys the message more clearly than 'labour's unqualifying support'. To me, the latter holds almost a negative connotation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: SC - SET 30 Q4
[#permalink]
12 Mar 2009, 09:56
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderators:
metallicafan, rajeevrks27, souvik101990, PTK, MacFauz, noboru, kissthegmat, carcass, willigetmylifeback, mikemcgarry, doe007, Vercules, Legendaddy, tuanquang269, Marcab, Narenn, GetThisDone
|