alltimeacheiver wrote:
The total cost of an office dinner was shared equally by k of the n employees who
attended the dinner. What was the total cost of the dinner?
(1) Each of the k employees who shared the cost of the dinner paid $19.
(2) If the total cost of the dinner had been shared equally by k + 1 of the n
employees who attended the dinner, each of the k + 1 employees would have
paid $18
stmnt1:
Kmembers each paid
$19==> total cost is
19Kbut the total cost can not be found as we do not know how many (
K) members paid that amount.
NOT SUFF.
stmnt2:
K+1 members paid
$18 each
==> total cost is
18(K+1)but the total cost can not be found as we do not know how many (
k+1) members paid that amount.
NOT SUFF.
1&2 together
it is implied that the amount paid by
K members, each paying
$19, is equilent to that paid by
K+1 members, each paying
$18==>
19K =
18(K+1)==>
K=18==> the toal cost of the dinner is
19K =
18(K+1) =
18*19=
$342 (costly dinner, i would never go to that restaurant)
Answer C.
Now in the
GMAT way (with out using variables such as x).
the total cost is paid by K members each paying $19
and also given that
the total cost could have been paid by K+1 members if each had payed $18
Means
if we added one person into the payees list, the cost for each person would be REDUCED by
$1 (from
19to
18) making the new person to pay
$18. this implies that the new person has bared
$18 of the total cost and made each of the original list of ppl to pay
$1 less. implies, The # of original ppl shud be
18 so that the new person can pay $18 baring
$1 from each of the original list of people (original payees).
means the orginal people were
18 and paid
$19 each
OR
with an additional person , the total # of people is
19 each paying
$18==> the total cost =
18*19 OR
19*18TRY solving the GMAT questions in the second way. Most of the word problems can be. It is called
"THINK without INK".Hope it helps.
Regards,
Murali.
Kudos?