Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 21 Oct 2014, 02:58

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

The town of Stavanger, Norway, was quiet and peaceful until

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 19 Feb 2004
Posts: 415
Location: Lungi
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

The town of Stavanger, Norway, was quiet and peaceful until [#permalink] New post 01 Apr 2004, 06:22
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 100% (01:38) wrong based on 2 sessions
The town of Stavanger, Norway, was quiet and peaceful until the
early 1960's, when Stavanger became Norway's center for offshore oil
exploration. Between then and now, violent crime and vandalism in
Stavanger have greatly increased. Cearly, these social problems are
among the results of Stavanger's oil boom.
Which of the following , if it occurred between the early 1960's and
now, give the strongest support to the argument above?
(A) The people of Stavanger rarely regret that their town was chosen
to be Norway's center for offshore oil exploration.
(B) Norwegian sociologists expressed grave concern about the increase
in violent crime and vandalism in stavanger.
(C) Violent crime and vandalism have remained low in Norwegian towns
that had no oil boom.
(D) Nonviolent crime, drug addiction, and divorce in Stavanger
increased approximately as much as violent crime and vandalism did.
(E) The oil boom necessitated the building of wider roads for the
increased traffic in Stavanger.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 27 Feb 2004
Posts: 187
Location: illinois
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 01 Apr 2004, 14:26
C for me here....Without oil boom they remained low and after Oil boom they increased..So it si one of the reasons...
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
avatar
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4318
Followers: 23

Kudos [?]: 171 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 01 Apr 2004, 15:41
Just to be different, I go with E :wink:

C) what if those other smaller towns had no oil boom but the crime rates have remained low for other reasons than not having an oil boom? ie better police force, judicial system. I don't think that saying other towns being X justifies and explains why Stavanger is not X
_________________

Best Regards,

Paul


Last edited by Paul on 01 Apr 2004, 16:01, edited 1 time in total.
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 30 Oct 2003
Posts: 1798
Location: NewJersey USA
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 36 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 01 Apr 2004, 18:39
Yeah what the heck I will choose E, but for a different reason.

Hypothetically assume Stavanger and other towns in Norway had no oil boom and also there was no violence. What can we infer here. The people must be peace loving folks or there was a great judicial system and local people were afraid of violating that system.

Now Oil boom occurs and still those people live there and no external people visit that place. What do you expect. Obviously the same result.

Since violence increased there must be some external factor. Only people can be external factor. Definitely outsiders came to that town and created a mess. Only E creates a possibility for external people to come into the town.


I have a problem with Batliwala's avtar (though it is perfect for his name) because it distracts me a lot
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
avatar
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4318
Followers: 23

Kudos [?]: 171 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 01 Apr 2004, 19:07
anandnk wrote:
Yeah what the heck I will choose E, but for a different reason.

Hypothetically assume Stavanger and other towns in Norway had no oil boom and also there was no violence. What can we infer here. The people must be peace loving folks or there was a great judicial system and local people were afraid of violating that system.

Now Oil boom occurs and still those people live there and no external people visit that place. What do you expect. Obviously the same result.

Since violence increased there must be some external factor. Only people can be external factor. Definitely outsiders came to that town and created a mess. Only E creates a possibility for external people to come into the town.


I have a problem with Batliwala's avtar (though it is perfect for his name) because it distracts me a lot

What a nice little story. I will also back you up because opening sentence says that the city was a "quiet and peaceful" one. Conclusion says that it's oil that brought about all that violence. Only way to link the premise and conclusion is a bridge argument. E says that the oil boom brought about the building of roads and an increase in traffic. This obviously disturbed the "quietness and peacefulness" of the city and thus the reason for the increase in violence
_________________

Best Regards,

Paul

GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
avatar
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4318
Followers: 23

Kudos [?]: 171 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 02 Apr 2004, 19:31
I'm very interested in knowing answer to this one. What is it Batli?
_________________

Best Regards,

Paul

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 19 Feb 2004
Posts: 415
Location: Lungi
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 02 Apr 2004, 19:54
answer given is C. sorry paul and anandnk. I liked the way you guys put on your thinking caps and debate. But, C definitely supports the argument strongly.

I have a problem with anandnk's avtar (though it is perfect for his name???) because he looks more like a ???? and that distracts me too.

anandnk, I will change my avatar if your is whining over it (just joking)
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 19 Feb 2004
Posts: 415
Location: Lungi
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 02 Apr 2004, 20:03
OMG, my avatar no longer exists... its gone (definitely not removed by me). This hurts me... but you guys have been nice, and I will definetly tolerate the insult.


rgds,
batli
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
avatar
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4318
Followers: 23

Kudos [?]: 171 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 02 Apr 2004, 20:04
Thank you Batli for posting all these nice CR in the last couple of days. They sure are good practice. Keep it up! :btw I still think that justifying why something is not happening in one place by relating it to another place is somewhat weak. It does not directly attack the argument at hand. Therefore, I still believe E is better. I stubbornly stick to E :beat
_________________

Best Regards,

Paul

GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
avatar
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4318
Followers: 23

Kudos [?]: 171 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 02 Apr 2004, 20:05
Batli, I don't think any of us erased your avatar...
_________________

Best Regards,

Paul

SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 30 Oct 2003
Posts: 1798
Location: NewJersey USA
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 36 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 02 Apr 2004, 20:11
Hi Batliwala,

This is outrageous.It did distract me but I like it anyway, I myself love booze!!! I was just kidding. Even Praetorian's avtar ( Julia Robert ) was distracting.

May be you can send a mail to Praetorian and see what happenend.

What is the OA.

Anand.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 19 Feb 2004
Posts: 415
Location: Lungi
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 02 Apr 2004, 20:30
OA is C.

Anand, I have nothing against you. I knew you were kidding & not complaining.I don't think it will be of any help informing praet as it makes no difference to me. Sorry, if I had hurt your feelings...don't take it to your heart.

rgds,
batli
  [#permalink] 02 Apr 2004, 20:30
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Norway NoggieViking 0 01 Nov 2011, 06:01
Norway NoggieViking 0 01 Nov 2011, 05:30
Schools in Norway Jonny4 5 27 Apr 2010, 11:17
Peace Of Mind johnnyx9 6 08 Mar 2007, 18:02
1 According to entomologists, single locusts are quiet ttanvir 17 14 Dec 2006, 16:33
Display posts from previous: Sort by

The town of Stavanger, Norway, was quiet and peaceful until

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


cron

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.