Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 10 Jul 2014, 15:04

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

The true scientific significance of a group of unusual

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 20 Apr 2005
Posts: 586
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 25 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
The true scientific significance of a group of unusual [#permalink] New post 18 May 2005, 16:30
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  5% (low)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
22. The true scientific significance of a group of unusual fossils discovered by the paleontologist Charles Walcott is more likely to be reflected in a recent classification than it was in Walcott’s own classification. Walcott was, after all, a prominent member of the scientific establishment. His classifications are thus unlikely to have done anything but confirm what established science had already taken to be true.

Which one of the following most accurately describes a questionable technique used in the argument?

(A) It draws conclusions about the merit of a position and about the content of that position from evidence about the position’s source.
(B) It cites two pieces of evidence, each of which is both questionable and unverifiable, and uses this evidence to support its conclusions.
(C) It bases a conclusion on two premises that contradict each other and minimizes this contradiction by the vagueness of the terms employed.
(D) It attempts to establish the validity of a claim, which is otherwise unsupported, by denying the truth of the opposite of that claim.
(E) It analyzes the past on the basis of social and political categories that properly apply only to the present and uses the results of this analysis to support its conclusion.
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 05 Apr 2005
Posts: 1736
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 29 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR: Charles Walcott [#permalink] New post 18 May 2005, 20:10
go with A..
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 04 Apr 2005
Posts: 7
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 18 May 2005, 22:14
Th way the argument is structed is : A claim is made . An evidence is presented a questionable conclusion is drawn from the eviedence to support the claim .

A: Source of the position : Recent classication more signifacnt has not been discussed


B : is wrong as there is only only eviedence, and that is neither questionable nor unverifiable.

C: There are no two premises which contradict each other.

D:Opposite of the claim is walcotts own classifiaction is significant. Has given evidence and concluded that this is not the case . So D seems right.

E:Social and political..looks like out of the scope.

based on the eveidence given above ( a la CR style ) I conclude that D is the correct answer.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 16 Oct 2004
Posts: 45
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 19 May 2005, 05:29
D seems to be correct
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 27 Jul 2004
Posts: 85
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 19 May 2005, 06:00
Definitely A
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 05 Jan 2005
Posts: 562
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 19 May 2005, 08:27
(A) for me
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 13 Jan 2005
Posts: 331
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 19 May 2005, 08:34
A for me
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 20 Apr 2005
Posts: 586
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 25 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Answer [#permalink] New post 24 May 2005, 06:19
The OA is A.
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 27 Dec 2004
Posts: 910
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 24 May 2005, 06:48
It's between A and D, I pick A.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 07 Nov 2004
Posts: 459
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 24 May 2005, 09:45
A.


Because Charles Walcott was a prominent member of science establishment, his classification cannot be new and innovative, so the recent classification of fossils is more significant.
  [#permalink] 24 May 2005, 09:45
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
2 Experts publish their posts in the topic The Destructors, is an unusually powerful film about a group mljh 2 26 Mar 2013, 10:57
2 Experts publish their posts in the topic Even though there has been significant scientific debate for Vercules 7 14 Mar 2013, 20:26
The true scientific significance of a group of unusual shobuj 2 12 Apr 2008, 08:11
The true scientific significance of a group of unusual aurobindo 5 01 May 2007, 21:51
Is it true? tel93 1 03 Jan 2005, 05:49
Display posts from previous: Sort by

The true scientific significance of a group of unusual

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.