The true scientific significance of a group of unusual : GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR)
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 17 Jan 2017, 05:12

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# The true scientific significance of a group of unusual

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Director
Affiliations: FRM Charter holder
Joined: 02 Dec 2006
Posts: 734
Schools: Stanford, Chicago Booth, Babson College
Followers: 16

Kudos [?]: 78 [0], given: 4

The true scientific significance of a group of unusual [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 May 2007, 21:51
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

The true scientific significance of a group of unusual fossils discovered by the paleontologist Charles Walcott is more likely to be reflected in a recent classification than it was in Walcottâ€™s own classification. Walcott was, after all, a prominent member of the scientific establishment. His classifications are thus unlikely to have done anything but confirm what established science had already taken to be true.

Which one of the following most accurately describes a questionable technique used in the argument?

(A) It draws conclusions about the merit of a position and about the content of that position from evidence about the positionâ€™s source.
(B) It cites two pieces of evidence, each of which is both questionable and unverifiable, and uses this evidence to support its conclusions.
(C) It bases a conclusion on two premises that contradict each other and minimizes this contradiction by the vagueness of the terms employed.
(D) It attempts to establish the validity of a claim, which is otherwise unsupported, by denying the truth of the opposite of that claim.
(E) It analyzes the past on the basis of social and political categories that properly apply only to the present and uses the results of this analysis to support its conclusion.
If you have any questions
New!
Senior Manager
Joined: 01 Jan 2007
Posts: 325
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 24 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

01 May 2007, 23:24
I will go with A.

Javed.

Cheers!
Director
Joined: 29 Jul 2006
Posts: 874
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 111 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

02 May 2007, 07:10
Clear A...
Director
Affiliations: FRM Charter holder
Joined: 02 Dec 2006
Posts: 734
Schools: Stanford, Chicago Booth, Babson College
Followers: 16

Kudos [?]: 78 [0], given: 4

### Show Tags

02 May 2007, 18:31
You guys are doing pretty well. A is the OA.
Manager
Joined: 23 Mar 2007
Posts: 176
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

03 May 2007, 09:38
Fully confused. Can anybody please explain the choices ?
Intern
Joined: 23 Apr 2007
Posts: 8
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

13 May 2007, 13:39
13 May 2007, 13:39
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
5 Even though there has been significant scientific debate for 8 14 Mar 2013, 20:26
Unusual Winter 6 28 Mar 2009, 12:18
Scientific research will be properly channeled whenever 3 27 Jun 2008, 11:52
The true scientific significance of a group of unusual 2 12 Apr 2008, 08:11
Scientific research will be properly channeled whenever 10 11 Feb 2007, 12:42
Display posts from previous: Sort by