my ans would be
1 ) THE E....
A) ceratinly right but ''corn ''is not the ONLY thing being said about here... there is ''soil'' too
B) good Assumption here but we don't know for sure ... do we !
C) THE STATES WOULD ONLY BE TOO HAPPY WITH THIS lot less to spend money on ... but it certainly is not what the argument means as asked ...
D) now this 's quite close but some how does not seem to say ''all'' that the argument asks...
E) this does the perfect 10 ! but since these are frm the stolyar's ''bank'' we just got be careful
2 - the ans is D ...
A) '' detailed statistical projection future soil lozz''? thats wierd the author does not even use the word here..
B) IN ALL STATES'' should b the weak-link here the author does not certainly talk about ''all'' states
C)quite close but when it goes ''natural resources'' it certainly is absurd 'cos the author does state that the natural resources are of importance but ''one'' is neglected...
e) here the comparision is between not the federal and state expenditure but ''expenditures for the nation as a whole to the federal expenditures for the states singualrly''
D) this comes close for me... could be jus wrong ! but when the author does mention 'at ridiculously low levels' I believe that he jus refrained from abusing the federal spending !
correct me jus If 'am not correct !
hope that helps!
the whole worldmakes way for the man who knows wer he's going... good luck