Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 21 Aug 2014, 20:09

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

The United States government generally tries to protect

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 16 Jan 2009
Posts: 362
Concentration: Technology, Marketing
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V34
GPA: 3
WE: Sales (Telecommunications)
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 67 [0], given: 16

GMAT Tests User
The United States government generally tries to protect [#permalink] New post 13 Sep 2009, 06:50
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

67% (03:02) correct 33% (01:18) wrong based on 11 sessions
The United States government generally tries to protect valuable natural resources. But one resource has been ignored for too long. In the United States, each bushel of corn produced might result in the loss of as much as two bushels of topsoil. Moreover, in the last 100 years, the topsoil in many states, which once was about fourteen inches thick, has been eroded to only six or eight inches. Nonetheless, federal expenditures for nationwide soil conservation programs have remained at ridiculously low levels. Total federal expenditures for nationwide soil conservation programs have been less than the allocations of some individual states.

Which one of the following best expresses the main point of the argument?
(A) Corn is not a cost-effective product and substitutes should be found where possible.
(B) A layer of topsoil only six to eight inches thick cannot support the continued cultivation of corn.
(C) Soil conservation is a responsibility of the federal government, not the states.
(D) The federal government’s expenditures for soil conservation in the various states have been inequitable.
(E) The federal government should spend much more on soil conservation than it has been spending.
_________________

Lahoosaher

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 16 Jan 2009
Posts: 362
Concentration: Technology, Marketing
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V34
GPA: 3
WE: Sales (Telecommunications)
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 67 [0], given: 16

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR : soil conservation [#permalink] New post 13 Sep 2009, 06:51
D and E look almost the same to me.
IMO D.
_________________

Lahoosaher

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 07 Jul 2009
Posts: 230
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 41 [0], given: 13

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR : soil conservation [#permalink] New post 13 Sep 2009, 16:43
D and E are close. But I would go with E. I believe D is kind of stated as one of the premises.
Current Student
User avatar
Joined: 16 Jan 2009
Posts: 187
Location: Ithaca, New York
Schools: Cornell University - The Johnson School
Followers: 9

Kudos [?]: 42 [0], given: 62

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR : soil conservation [#permalink] New post 13 Sep 2009, 18:10
amolsk11 wrote:
The United States government generally tries to protect valuable natural resources. But one resource has been ignored for too long. In the United States, each bushel of corn produced might result in the loss of as much as two bushels of topsoil. Moreover, in the last 100 years, the topsoil in many states, which once was about fourteen inches thick, has been eroded to only six or eight inches. Nonetheless, federal expenditures for nationwide soil conservation programs have remained at ridiculously low levels. Total federal expenditures for nationwide soil conservation programs have been less than the allocations of some individual states.

Which one of the following best expresses the main point of the argument?
(A) Corn is not a cost-effective product and substitutes should be found where possible.
(B) A layer of topsoil only six to eight inches thick cannot support the continued cultivation of corn.
(C) Soil conservation is a responsibility of the federal government, not the states.
(D) The federal government’s expenditures for soil conservation in the various states have been inequitable.
(E) The federal government should spend much more on soil conservation than it has been spending.


Whenever I get these type of questions I try to phrase the answer in the form of a conclusion. The conclusion should never reach beyond what was stated in the stimulus.

A) What does cost-effectiveness of corn have to do with top-soil? Irrelevant.

B) The premises never state this. This answer is a goner.

C) Whoa! When did the premises say that? It states that the United States government generally tries to protect valuable natural resources not that only the federal government has the responsibility.

D) Inequitable means unfair. Where does the stimulus state that the federal government's expenditures for soil conservation have been unfair.

E) I like it because stimulus contains a persuasive argument that federal expenditures for nationwide soil conservation programs have remained at ridiculously low levels and if the federal government is concerned about protecting valuable natural resources then it should spend much more on soil conservation than it has been spending.

The language isn't too strong in this answer choice.

I'll go with E!!!
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 16 Jan 2009
Posts: 362
Concentration: Technology, Marketing
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V34
GPA: 3
WE: Sales (Telecommunications)
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 67 [0], given: 16

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR : soil conservation [#permalink] New post 13 Sep 2009, 22:00
Thanks for the explanation Franklin.
[Reveal] Spoiler:
OA - E

_________________

Lahoosaher

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 14 Dec 2008
Posts: 171
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 39

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR : soil conservation [#permalink] New post 05 Oct 2009, 22:52
agree with E
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 24 Aug 2007
Posts: 956
WE 1: 3.5 yrs IT
WE 2: 2.5 yrs Retail chain
Followers: 53

Kudos [?]: 690 [0], given: 40

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR : soil conservation [#permalink] New post 24 Apr 2010, 06:15
IMO E.

D is definitly not the OA as we are not given stats on other states expenditure by US federal. So, we can say the amount is inequitable. This choice, D, is a SHELL GAME trap.

amolsk11 wrote:
The United States government generally tries to protect valuable natural resources. But one resource has been ignored for too long. In the United States, each bushel of corn produced might result in the loss of as much as two bushels of topsoil. Moreover, in the last 100 years, the topsoil in many states, which once was about fourteen inches thick, has been eroded to only six or eight inches. Nonetheless, federal expenditures for nationwide soil conservation programs have remained at ridiculously low levels. Total federal expenditures for nationwide soil conservation programs have been less than the allocations of some individual states.

Which one of the following best expresses the main point of the argument?
(A) Corn is not a cost-effective product and substitutes should be found where possible.
(B) A layer of topsoil only six to eight inches thick cannot support the continued cultivation of corn.
(C) Soil conservation is a responsibility of the federal government, not the states.
(D) The federal government’s expenditures for soil conservation in the various states have been inequitable.
(E) The federal government should spend much more on soil conservation than it has been spending.

_________________

Want to improve your CR: cr-methods-an-approach-to-find-the-best-answers-93146.html
Tricky Quant problems: 50-tricky-questions-92834.html
Important Grammer Fundamentals: key-fundamentals-of-grammer-our-crucial-learnings-on-sc-93659.html

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 27 Feb 2010
Posts: 106
Location: Denver
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 107 [0], given: 14

Re: CR : soil conservation [#permalink] New post 24 Apr 2010, 10:22
After reviewing all the five choices ..my vote is for E as it matches the best answer and make sense. Good explaination franklin.
Current Student
User avatar
Status: mba here i come!
Joined: 07 Aug 2011
Posts: 271
Location: Pakistan
Concentration: Strategy, Marketing
Schools: Insead '13 (M)
GMAT 1: 680 Q46 V37
GMAT 2: Q V
Followers: 25

Kudos [?]: 692 [0], given: 48

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: The United States government generally tries to protect [#permalink] New post 28 Feb 2012, 06:39
conclusion (main point): Total federal expenditures for nationwide soil conservation programs have been less than the allocations of some individual states.

in so many words, E states the same i.e. federal govt should spend more.

ans: E
_________________

press +1 Kudos to appreciate posts
Download Valuable Collection of Percentage Questions (PS/DS)

Re: The United States government generally tries to protect   [#permalink] 28 Feb 2012, 06:39
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
5 Utility companies in the United States are generally private BukrsGmat 7 04 Jul 2013, 02:18
2 Experts publish their posts in the topic The United States government generally tries to protect Marcab 8 11 Dec 2012, 02:11
6 The first United States Solicitor General, Benjamin H. solarzj 5 03 Jun 2012, 02:16
Homeowners in the United States are typically protected GMATT73 11 13 Oct 2005, 23:43
The United States government generally tries to Protect crackgmat3 2 14 Sep 2004, 12:57
Display posts from previous: Sort by

The United States government generally tries to protect

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


cron

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.