Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 01 Aug 2015, 22:25
GMAT Club Tests

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

The usefulness of lie detectors cannot be overestimated.

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 20 Apr 2005
Posts: 586
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 74 [0], given: 0

The usefulness of lie detectors cannot be overestimated. [#permalink] New post 06 May 2005, 14:47
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 1 sessions
26. The usefulness of lie detectors cannot be overestimated. Although there is no employee screening procedure that is 100 percent accurate, the lie detector is a valuable tool for employers and employees alike. The lie detector’s usefulness is amply demonstrated in a recent survey conducted by a prestigious university. In the survey, those employees of a large company who were applying for a newly created position within the company were asked if they had ever worked on Project X. More than one-third of the applicants studied lied and said they had worked on the project—a project that never existed.

Which one of the following best identifies a flaw in the author’s argument about the usefulness of lie detectors?

(A) The argument depends on the assumption that whatever is good for the employer is good for the employee.
(B) Since lie detectors are known to be less than 100 percent accurate, the test will tend to help only those with something to hide.
(C) By referring to a prestigious university, the author is appealing to authority rather than to evidence.
(D) The study shows only that certain individual will lie, not that the lie detector can detect them.
(E) The author fails to address the issue that the use of lie detectors may fail to prevent embezzlement.
Current Student
User avatar
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Posts: 5240
Followers: 23

Kudos [?]: 198 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 07 May 2005, 04:20
C all the way. The employees could have lied but it wasn`t caught by the detector. We don`t have the statistical evidence available for analysis.
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 05 Jan 2005
Posts: 561
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 0

Re: CR: Lying [#permalink] New post 07 May 2005, 12:51
WinWinMBA wrote:
26. The usefulness of lie detectors cannot be overestimated. Although there is no employee screening procedure that is 100 percent accurate, the lie detector is a valuable tool for employers and employees alike. The lie detector’s usefulness is amply demonstrated in a recent survey conducted by a prestigious university. In the survey, those employees of a large company who were applying for a newly created position within the company were asked if they had ever worked on Project X. More than one-third of the applicants studied lied and said they had worked on the project—a project that never existed.

Which one of the following best identifies a flaw in the author’s argument about the usefulness of lie detectors?

(A) The argument depends on the assumption that whatever is good for the employer is good for the employee.
(B) Since lie detectors are known to be less than 100 percent accurate, the test will tend to help only those with something to hide.
(C) By referring to a prestigious university, the author is appealing to authority rather than to evidence.
(D) The study shows only that certain individual will lie, not that the lie detector can detect them.
(E) The author fails to address the issue that the use of lie detectors may fail to prevent embezzlement.


(D) for me.
The lie dectector did not proove that employment seekers lied (about involvement in project X) and so the survey was simply not relevant in determining the effect of the lie detector.
Re: CR: Lying   [#permalink] 07 May 2005, 12:51
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
The use of radar detectors in commercial vehicles was banned because c WoundedTiger 0 13 Oct 2014, 03:59
The usefulness of lie detectors cannot be overestimated. tenaman10 5 17 Jun 2009, 22:30
2 Experts publish their posts in the topic The use of radar detectors in commercial vehicles was banned sondenso 16 05 Jun 2008, 19:13
Pausville and Longtown cannot both be included in the laxieqv 6 27 Sep 2007, 17:27
The usefulness of lie detectors cannot be overestimated. Fistail 8 12 Sep 2007, 22:11
Display posts from previous: Sort by

The usefulness of lie detectors cannot be overestimated.

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.