Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 20 Oct 2014, 13:23

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

The usefulness of lie detectors cannot be overestimated.

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 03 May 2007
Posts: 899
Schools: University of Chicago, Wharton School
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 52 [0], given: 7

The usefulness of lie detectors cannot be overestimated. [#permalink] New post 12 Sep 2007, 22:11
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
The usefulness of lie detectors cannot be overestimated. Although there is no employee screening procedure that is 100 percent accurate, the lie detector is a valuable tool for employers and employees alike. The lie detector’s usefulness is amply demonstrated in a recent survey conducted by a prestigious university. In the survey, those employees of a large company who were applying for a newly created position within the company were asked if they had ever worked on Project X. More than one-third of the applicants studied lied and said they had worked on the project—a project that never existed.

Which one of the following best identifies a flaw in the author’s argument about the usefulness of lie detectors?

(A) The argument depends on the assumption that whatever is good for the employer is good for the employee.
(B) Since lie detectors are known to be less than 100 percent accurate, the test will tend to help only those with something to hide.
(C) By referring to a prestigious university, the author is appealing to authority rather than to evidence.
(D) The study shows only that certain individual will lie, not that the lie detector can detect them.
(E) The author fails to address the issue that the use of lie detectors may fail to prevent embezzlement.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 13 Mar 2007
Posts: 296
Location: Russia, Moscow
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 0

Re: CR: Interesting story about lie detector [#permalink] New post 12 Sep 2007, 23:32
Fistail wrote:
The usefulness of lie detectors cannot be overestimated. Although there is no employee screening procedure that is 100 percent accurate, the lie detector is a valuable tool for employers and employees alike. The lie detector’s usefulness is amply demonstrated in a recent survey conducted by a prestigious university. In the survey, those employees of a large company who were applying for a newly created position within the company were asked if they had ever worked on Project X. More than one-third of the applicants studied lied and said they had worked on the project—a project that never existed.

Which one of the following best identifies a flaw in the author’s argument about the usefulness of lie detectors?

(A) The argument depends on the assumption that whatever is good for the employer is good for the employee.
(B) Since lie detectors are known to be less than 100 percent accurate, the test will tend to help only those with something to hide.
(C) By referring to a prestigious university, the author is appealing to authority rather than to evidence.
(D) The study shows only that certain individual will lie, not that the lie detector can detect them.
(E) The author fails to address the issue that the use of lie detectors may fail to prevent embezzlement.


I think it is D
CEO
CEO
User avatar
Joined: 29 Mar 2007
Posts: 2593
Followers: 16

Kudos [?]: 197 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 12 Sep 2007, 23:40
I say D. C is the only other one that comes close, but it sounds like GMAT extremism and ventures too far from the argument.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 07 Dec 2006
Posts: 169
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 25 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 13 Sep 2007, 00:02
IMO, D
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 20 Jun 2007
Posts: 157
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 13 Sep 2007, 00:30
Looks like D.

From what I understand, the piece isn't saying that the lie was detected by the lie detector. It was detected because the answer given could only possibly be a lie. So the claim tells us nothing about the effectiveness of lie detectors.
Intern
Intern
User avatar
Joined: 06 Aug 2007
Posts: 31
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: CR: Interesting story about lie detector [#permalink] New post 13 Sep 2007, 02:16
Main conclusion of the argument is " The usefulness of lie detectors cannot be overestimated ", which depends on the sub-conclusion "the lie detector is a valuable tool for employers and employees alike". In turn, sub-conclusion is supported by the survey that acts as evidance/premise.
Survey only supports the conclusion to the extent that lie detectors are valuable for EMPLOYERS, while the argument mistakenly assumes that what is valuable for employers is also valuable for employees. there is no supporting information for this assumption.

A) correctly identifies the flaw in reasoning.

D) it seems to possibly identify the weakness/consfusion in the premise, but this is not the area that is tested in LR. I don't think we need to worry about validity, truthfulness or confusion in premise. it's same as spelling mistakes are not tested in SC.
In LR, I believe, logic behind the argument is tested. we gotta see whether infomation provided in the argument logically supports the conclusion? and, whether author makes reasonable assumptions ?

what is source of this question ?
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 11 Sep 2006
Posts: 48
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 13 Sep 2007, 07:01
A for the same reason as above.
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 03 May 2007
Posts: 899
Schools: University of Chicago, Wharton School
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 52 [0], given: 7

Re: CR: Interesting story about lie detector [#permalink] New post 13 Sep 2007, 07:17
OA is D.
Intern
Intern
User avatar
Joined: 06 Aug 2007
Posts: 31
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: CR: Interesting story about lie detector [#permalink] New post 13 Sep 2007, 17:40
can you please tell the source ?
Re: CR: Interesting story about lie detector   [#permalink] 13 Sep 2007, 17:40
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
The use of lie detectors is based on the ankitaprsd 0 04 Sep 2014, 03:13
11 Experts publish their posts in the topic The use of lie detectors is based on the assumption that flyinhair 31 06 Sep 2009, 09:19
The usefulness of lie detectors cannot be overestimated. tenaman10 5 17 Jun 2009, 22:30
The use of lie detectors is based on the assumption that thinkblue 10 31 May 2009, 22:15
The usefulness of lie detectors cannot be overestimated. WinWinMBA 2 06 May 2005, 14:47
Display posts from previous: Sort by

The usefulness of lie detectors cannot be overestimated.

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.