The violent crime rate (number of violent crimes per 1,000 : GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR)
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 22 Jan 2017, 21:11

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# The violent crime rate (number of violent crimes per 1,000

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Intern
Joined: 02 Jan 2009
Posts: 14
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 42 [7] , given: 0

The violent crime rate (number of violent crimes per 1,000 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Mar 2009, 07:04
7
KUDOS
21
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

55% (hard)

Question Stats:

54% (01:42) correct 46% (00:47) wrong based on 1016 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

The violent crime rate (number of violent crimes per 1,000 residents) in Meadowbrook is 60 percent higher now than it was four years ago. The corresponding increase for Parkdale is only 10 percent. These figures support the conclusion that residents of Meadowbrook are more likely to become victims of violent crime than are residents of
Parkdale.

The argument above is flawed because it fails to take into account
A. changes in the population density of both Parkdale and Meadowbrook over the past four years
B. how the rate of population growth in Meadowbrook over the past four years compares to the corresponding rate for Parkdale
C. the ratio of violent to nonviolent crimes committed during the past four years in Meadowbrook and Parkdale
D. the violent crime rates in Meadowbrook and Parkdale four years ago
E. how Meadowbrook’s expenditures for crime prevention over the past four years compare to Parkdale’s expenditures
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
If you have any questions
you can ask an expert
New!
SVP
Joined: 07 Nov 2007
Posts: 1820
Location: New York
Followers: 34

Kudos [?]: 867 [10] , given: 5

Re: The violent crime rate (number of violent crimes per 1,000 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Mar 2009, 07:17
10
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
e.g
ratio of crimes M: P = 100: 200

M -->1000 --> 100 (four years ago) --> 160 (now : 60% more)
P -->1000 --> 200 (four years ago) --> 220 (now : 10% more)

Who is more likely to become victims : P..

C is the best answer.
_________________

Smiling wins more friends than frowning

Director
Joined: 04 Jan 2008
Posts: 912
Followers: 69

Kudos [?]: 572 [1] , given: 17

Re: The violent crime rate (number of violent crimes per 1,000 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Mar 2009, 07:23
1
KUDOS
Its B
let me explain

A. changes in the population density of both Parkdale and Meadowbrook over the
past four years ---density has no corelation here
B. how the rate of population growth in Meadowbrook over the past four years
compares to the corresponding rate for Parkdale
C. the ratio of violent to nonviolent crimes committed during the past four years in
Meadowbrook and Parkdale --ratio does not matter
D. the violent crime rates in Meadowbrook and Parkdale four years ago --OOS
E. how Meadowbrook’s expenditures for crime prevention over the past four years
compare to Parkdale’s expenditures--totally OOS
_________________

http://gmatclub.com/forum/math-polygons-87336.html
http://gmatclub.com/forum/competition-for-the-best-gmat-error-log-template-86232.html

Intern
Joined: 02 Jan 2009
Posts: 14
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 42 [0], given: 0

Re: The violent crime rate (number of violent crimes per 1,000 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Mar 2009, 07:32
x2suresh

do you mean D? C is talking about the ratio of violent to nonviolent crimes

x2suresh wrote:
e.g
ratio of crimes M: P = 100: 200

M -->1000 --> 100 (four years ago) --> 160 (now : 60% more)
P -->1000 --> 200 (four years ago) --> 220 (now : 10% more)

Who is more likely to become victims : P..

C is the best answer.
Director
Joined: 04 Jan 2008
Posts: 912
Followers: 69

Kudos [?]: 572 [0], given: 17

Re: The violent crime rate (number of violent crimes per 1,000 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Mar 2009, 07:39
Agreed D
I misread it completely
I meant that if there is high base % increase does not represent true picture
_________________

http://gmatclub.com/forum/math-polygons-87336.html
http://gmatclub.com/forum/competition-for-the-best-gmat-error-log-template-86232.html

SVP
Joined: 07 Nov 2007
Posts: 1820
Location: New York
Followers: 34

Kudos [?]: 867 [3] , given: 5

Re: The violent crime rate (number of violent crimes per 1,000 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Mar 2009, 07:58
3
KUDOS
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
janet1511 wrote:
x2suresh

do you mean D? C is talking about the ratio of violent to nonviolent crimes

x2suresh wrote:
e.g
ratio of crimes M: P = 100: 200

M -->1000 --> 100 (four years ago) --> 160 (now : 60% more)
P -->1000 --> 200 (four years ago) --> 220 (now : 10% more)

Who is more likely to become victims : P..

C is the best answer.

Sorry yeap.. I mean D.
_________________

Smiling wins more friends than frowning

Intern
Joined: 11 Mar 2009
Posts: 12
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 0

Re: The violent crime rate (number of violent crimes per 1,000 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Mar 2009, 08:24
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
D, since the argument only shows a relative increase and not an absolute increase, e.g. a 10% rise from 100 crimes per 1,000 residents (+10) is more than a 60% rise from 10 crimes per 1,000 residents (+6).
Director
Joined: 12 Oct 2008
Posts: 554
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 426 [2] , given: 2

Re: The violent crime rate (number of violent crimes per 1,000 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Feb 2010, 17:10
2
KUDOS
4
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Agree with D.

4 yrs ago M has violent rate 100. 4 yrs after it is increased by 60%...it becomes 160

4 yrs ago P has violent rate 200. 4 yrs after it is increased by 10%...it becomes 220

This shows that residents of P are more victims than M. Argument fails to consider this. Therefore, IMO d
Manager
Joined: 29 Oct 2009
Posts: 201
Concentration: General Management, Sustainability
WE: Consulting (Computer Software)
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 92 [1] , given: 12

Re: The violent crime rate (number of violent crimes per 1,000 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Mar 2010, 08:25
1
KUDOS
First my choice was B. But after reading the reasons for D, I too feel D is the correct option.

What is OA?
Manager
Status: Applying
Joined: 18 Jul 2009
Posts: 155
Location: United Kingdom
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GPA: 3.65
WE: Consulting (Telecommunications)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 6

Re: The violent crime rate (number of violent crimes per 1,000 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Mar 2010, 23:14
D it is as posted by reply2psg
Manager
Status: SC SC SC SC SC.... Concentrating on SC alone.
Joined: 20 Dec 2010
Posts: 240
Location: India
Concentration: General Management
GMAT Date: 12-30-2011
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 60 [0], given: 47

Re: The violent crime rate (number of violent crimes per 1,000 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Nov 2011, 20:52
D wins !
_________________

D- Day December 30 2011. Hoping for the happiest new year celebrations !

Aiming for 700+

Kudo me if the post is worth it

BSchool Forum Moderator
Status: Flying over the cloud!
Joined: 16 Aug 2011
Posts: 912
Location: Viet Nam
Concentration: International Business, Marketing
GMAT Date: 06-06-2014
GPA: 3.07
Followers: 73

Kudos [?]: 603 [0], given: 44

Re: The violent crime rate (number of violent crimes per 1,000 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Nov 2011, 23:06
I agree with D. The number and statistic in this question quite easy, but the thing we need is to read the right answer express correctly our idea.
_________________

Rules for posting in verbal gmat forum, read it before posting anything in verbal forum
Giving me + 1 kudos if my post is valuable with you

The more you like my post, the more you share to other's need

CR: Focus of the Week: Must be True Question

Manager
Joined: 08 Jul 2008
Posts: 148
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 3 [1] , given: 1

Re: The violent crime rate (number of violent crimes per 1,000 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Nov 2011, 19:27
1
KUDOS
D
Manager
Status: Time to apply!
Joined: 24 Aug 2011
Posts: 220
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 600 Q48 V25
GMAT 2: 660 Q50 V29
GMAT 3: 690 Q49 V34
GPA: 3.2
WE: Engineering (Computer Software)
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 113 [0], given: 166

Re: The violent crime rate (number of violent crimes per 1,000 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Nov 2011, 21:42
D looks correct to me
_________________

Didn't give up !!! Still Trying!!

Senior Manager
Joined: 25 Nov 2011
Posts: 261
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, General Management
GPA: 3.95
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 166 [0], given: 20

Re: The violent crime rate (number of violent crimes per 1,000 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Jan 2012, 09:30
Any time the argument talks about percentages, we need to look for an answer that talks about absolute numbers.

Hence, D!
_________________

-------------------------
-Aravind Chembeti

Manager
Joined: 12 Nov 2011
Posts: 143
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 24

Re: The violent crime rate (number of violent crimes per 1,000 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Jan 2012, 08:52
Agree with D
Senior Manager
Joined: 19 Apr 2011
Posts: 289
Schools: Booth,NUS,St.Gallon
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 282 [1] , given: 51

Re: The violent crime rate (number of violent crimes per 1,000 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Jan 2012, 22:46
1
KUDOS
the best answer is D.But i feel even D is flawed.We need to know the absolute number of crimes in both the cities 4 years ago,the rates are not going to give a clear answer.
_________________

+1 if you like my explanation .Thanks

Manager
Joined: 08 Jul 2008
Posts: 148
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 1

Re: The violent crime rate (number of violent crimes per 1,000 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Jan 2012, 16:18
+1 D
Manager
Joined: 27 Oct 2011
Posts: 191
Location: United States
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GMAT 1: Q V
GPA: 3.7
WE: Account Management (Consumer Products)
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 150 [0], given: 4

Re: The violent crime rate (number of violent crimes per 1,000 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Apr 2012, 20:46
the argument fails to look at what the starting point is. and only D addresses this.
_________________

DETERMINED TO BREAK 700!!!

Manager
Joined: 30 Jul 2011
Posts: 119
Location: United States (NJ)
Concentration: General Management, Finance
GMAT 1: 520 Q40 V21
GPA: 2.95
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 24 [0], given: 24

Re: The violent crime rate (number of violent crimes per 1,000 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Apr 2012, 10:49
I can see why D was selected, but can someone explain why A is incorrect?

If the population density if each city is different, would that not have an effect on the figures that are given in the stimulus?
Re: The violent crime rate (number of violent crimes per 1,000   [#permalink] 21 Apr 2012, 10:49

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 34 posts ]

Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
1 The rate of violent crime in this state is up 30 percent 4 09 Jun 2013, 23:35
4 The rate of violent crime in this state is up 35 percent 8 29 Oct 2012, 22:07
The rate of violent crime in this state is up 30 percent 4 18 Aug 2009, 08:28
violent crime rates 4 07 Jul 2009, 07:33
1 The violent crime rate (number of violent crimes per 1,000 11 01 Sep 2007, 00:27
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# The violent crime rate (number of violent crimes per 1,000

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.