Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 21 Aug 2014, 04:23

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

The woodland sub-species were in isolation from contact with

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Posts: 267
Location: nj
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 33 [0], given: 2

GMAT Tests User
The woodland sub-species were in isolation from contact with [#permalink] New post 12 Mar 2009, 10:44
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  25% (medium)

Question Stats:

50% (01:43) correct 50% (00:36) wrong based on 267 sessions
The woodland sub-species were in isolation from contact with humans longer than either their marsh cousins or the tree-dwelling sub-species.

(A) in isolation from contact with humans longer than
(B) isolated from contact with humans longer than
(C) in isolation from contact with humans longer than were
(D) isolated from contact with humans longer than were
(E) in isolation and without contacts with humans longer than

please explain answers....
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
9 KUDOS received
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 04 Jan 2008
Posts: 919
Followers: 44

Kudos [?]: 158 [9] , given: 17

GMAT Tests User
Re: SC - Woodland [#permalink] New post 12 Mar 2009, 11:14
9
This post received
KUDOS
Check This
=============
106.Inuits of the Bering Sea were in isolation from contact with Europeans longer than Aleuts or Inuits of the North Pacific and northern Alaska.
(A) in isolation from contact with Europeans longer than
(B) isolated from contact with Europeans longer than
(C) in isolation from contact with Europeans longer than were
(D) isolated from contact with Europeans longer than were
(E) in isolation and without contacts with Europeans longer than
Idiom + Logical predication
The construction in isolation from is awkward;the idiomatic way to express this idea is isolated from.The comparison is ambiguous;it could mean the Bering Sea Inuits were isolated from Europeans 1onger than they were isolated from Aleuts and other Inuits or that they were isolated from Europeans longer than Aleuts and other Inuits were isolated from Europeans.Adding were after than will solve this problem.
[Reveal] Spoiler:
A In isolation from is not the correct idiom;the comparison is ambiguous.
B The comparison is ambiguous.
C In isolation from is not the correct idiom.
D Correct.The idiom isolated from is correctly used in this sentence;the comparison is clear and unambiguous.
E In isolation…with is incorrect and confusing;the comparison is ambiguous.

The correct answer[spoiler=]is D.
[/spoiler]
===============
IMO-->In My opinion
OA->Official Answer
Kudos-->when you like someone's post, thank him by pressing the [+1] button :P
Thanks
_________________

math-polygons-87336.html
competition-for-the-best-gmat-error-log-template-86232.html


Last edited by nitya34 on 28 Oct 2013, 06:57, edited 3 times in total.
1 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 09 Sep 2009
Posts: 19
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 11 [1] , given: 2

Re: SC - Woodland [#permalink] New post 28 Jan 2010, 08:20
1
This post received
KUDOS
Neeshpal,

You are taking the question in a wrong way. You are trying to compare the isolation of woodland sub species from other species. However, this question compare the isolation of woodland from human contact with the isolation of other species from human contact.

So, it'll be like The woodland sub-species were isolated from contact with humans longer than other species were.

That's why the correct ans is D.
---------

If someone like my post, consider it for Kudos so that my Kudos account get started :P

neeshpal wrote:
OA is D.

but my question here is doesnt it needs a "from" or is it implicit like "they"
The woodland sub-species were isolated from contact with humans longer than (they) were (from) .....
1 KUDOS received
Director
Director
User avatar
Status: Final Countdown
Joined: 17 Mar 2010
Posts: 564
Location: India
GPA: 3.82
WE: Account Management (Retail Banking)
Followers: 11

Kudos [?]: 127 [1] , given: 75

Re: The woodland sub-species were in isolation from contact with [#permalink] New post 06 Feb 2012, 17:52
1
This post received
KUDOS
D
Use-WERE parallelism
use-Isolated rather than in isolation
_________________

" Make more efforts "
Press Kudos if you liked my post

1 KUDOS received
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 1640
Followers: 229

Kudos [?]: 50 [1] , given: 0

Premium Member
Re: The woodland sub-species were in isolation from contact with [#permalink] New post 26 Jan 2014, 18:44
1
This post received
KUDOS
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 02 Mar 2009
Posts: 138
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 29 [0], given: 0

Re: SC - Woodland [#permalink] New post 12 Mar 2009, 10:56
The woodland sub-species were in isolation from contact with humans longer than either their marsh cousins or the tree-dwelling sub-species.

A. in isolation from contact with humans longer than
B. isolated from contact with humans longer than
C. in isolation from contact with humans longer than were
D. isolated from contact with humans longer than were
E. in isolation and without contacts with humans longer than

I shall go with B

A: 'in isolation from contact' seems wrong idiomatically
C: 'in isolation from contact' seems wrong idiomatically
D: Hmm..this was probably the strongest contender but for some reason I think 'were' is not necessary. It is sort of implied because 'were isolated from contact' comes before either..or. It is similar to a question i did on this forum: 'from the sites of the civilization that flourised at the same time as civilization Nigris...' The sentence did not include 'flourished at the same time as did civilization Nigris..'
E: The two points are not separate..hence no need of And.

What is the OA?
Also, what does IMO stand for? Sorry, I am new to this forum lingo!
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 02 Mar 2009
Posts: 138
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 29 [0], given: 0

Re: SC - Woodland [#permalink] New post 12 Mar 2009, 11:20
Thanks for the briefing Nitya..

I guess we really are poles apart on this one.

Neeshpal, can you give us the official answer?
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 02 Mar 2009
Posts: 138
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 29 [0], given: 0

Re: SC - Woodland [#permalink] New post 12 Mar 2009, 11:23
Ok brilliant..

The question is exactly similar.

Thanks!

In our case D then
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Posts: 267
Location: nj
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 33 [0], given: 2

GMAT Tests User
Re: SC - Woodland [#permalink] New post 12 Mar 2009, 13:12
OA is D.

but my question here is doesnt it needs a "from" or is it implicit like "they"
The woodland sub-species were isolated from contact with humans longer than (they) were (from) .....
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 29 Aug 2005
Posts: 881
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 148 [0], given: 7

GMAT Tests User
Re: SC - Woodland [#permalink] New post 14 Mar 2009, 04:11
neeshpal wrote:
OA is D.

but my question here is doesnt it needs a "from" or is it implicit like "they"
The woodland sub-species were isolated from contact with humans longer than (they) were (from) .....

section after "than" is inverted. You can read it as "either their marsh cousins or the tree-dwelling sub-species were".
Intern
Intern
User avatar
Joined: 16 Dec 2009
Posts: 2
Location: NYC
Schools: St. Josephs University, Daniels College (University of Denver)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: SC - Woodland [#permalink] New post 28 Jan 2010, 06:18
I go with D also.

I like the verbal questions so much more than the math...
_________________

"Sometimes I wonder whether the world is being run by smart people who are putting us on or by imbeciles who really mean it." Mark Twain

Current Student
avatar
Joined: 15 Dec 2009
Posts: 289
Schools: Duke
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 49 [0], given: 12

GMAT Tests User
Re: SC - Woodland [#permalink] New post 28 Jan 2010, 11:29
I would go with D as well. This problem is a combination off idiom + parallelism
in isolation from is not idiomatic to me
and the 'were' is required for the parallel structure thus D
_________________

Get the best GMAT Prep Resources with GMAT Club Premium Membership

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 12 Jul 2009
Posts: 13
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 2

Re: SC - Woodland [#permalink] New post 29 Jan 2010, 09:48
The fight is clearly between C and D. S sounds bit awkward. Generally, we say Prisoner are kept in isolation and from is implicit and not used . But in this case, in order to make the comparison work, from is needed and hence, D.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 24 Jul 2009
Posts: 193
Location: Anchorage, AK
Schools: Mellon, USC, MIT, UCLA, NSCU
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 10

GMAT Tests User
Re: SC - Woodland [#permalink] New post 29 Jan 2010, 20:42
Thanks for the reminder about parallelism. I chose B and will remember why I was incorrect - missing "were."

Posted from my mobile device Image
_________________

Reward wisdom with kudos. ;)

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 19 Jun 2011
Posts: 38
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 11

Re: The woodland sub-species were in isolation from contact with [#permalink] New post 06 Feb 2012, 13:45
Can anyone explain the ending part of D. I understand why it is isolated from ( originally chose B ) but I do not understand why it is "than were" rather then "than."

"Than were either" sounds real awkward and weird. "Than" is shorter and concise, B has more brevity than D.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 19 Apr 2011
Posts: 291
Schools: Booth,NUS,St.Gallon
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 68 [0], given: 51

GMAT Tests User
Re: The woodland sub-species were in isolation from contact with [#permalink] New post 07 Feb 2012, 04:19
Good question D must be the answer .But i chhose B thinking it to be correct and concise but it omits were and because of that there is a faulty construction . Need to be more careful to notice these traps
_________________

+1 if you like my explanation .Thanks :)

Re: The woodland sub-species were in isolation from contact with   [#permalink] 07 Feb 2012, 04:19
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
The woodland sub-species were in isolation from contact with BukrsGmat 3 05 Mar 2012, 04:14
The woodland sub-species were in isolation from contact with neelesh 2 16 Mar 2008, 06:24
2 The woodland sub-species were in isolation from contact with zoom612 13 28 Jun 2006, 05:42
2 The woodland sub-species were in isolation from contact with SunShine 11 28 Dec 2005, 04:06
The woodland sub-species were in isolation from contact with smovva 2 26 Sep 2005, 17:12
Display posts from previous: Sort by

The woodland sub-species were in isolation from contact with

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


cron

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.