Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 22 Oct 2014, 22:57

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

their own bank, the bank s depositors, who had been worried

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 11 Sep 2006
Posts: 48
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 0

their own bank, the bank s depositors, who had been worried [#permalink] New post 25 Jul 2007, 21:16
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
their own bank, the bank’s depositors, who had been worried by rumors that the bank faced impending financial collapse, have been greatly relieved. They reason that since top executives evidently have faith in the bank’s financial soundness, those worrisome rumors must be false. They might well be overoptimistic, however since corporate executives have sometimes bought shares in their own company in a calculated attempt to dispel negative rumors about the company’s health. In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?

A. The first summarizes the evidence used in the reasoning called into question by the argument; the second states the counterevidence on which the argument relies.
B. The first summarizes the evidence used in the reasoning called into question by the argument; the second is an intermediate conclusion supported by the evidence.
C. The first is an intermediate conclusion that forms part of the reasoning called into question by the argument; the second is evidence that undermines the support for this intermediate conclusion.
D. The first is an intermediate conclusion that forms part of the reasoning called into question by the argument; the second is the main conclusion of the argument.
E. The first is an intermediate conclusion that forms part of the reasoning called into question by the argument; the second states a further conclusion supported by this intermediate conclusion.
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 11 Jun 2007
Posts: 932
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 51 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 25 Jul 2007, 22:31
would the answer be C?
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 28 Feb 2007
Posts: 35
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 25 Jul 2007, 22:39
D.
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 06 Sep 2006
Posts: 746
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 26 Jul 2007, 07:43
top executives evidently have faith in the bank’s financial soundness (Intermediate conculsion)
They might well be overoptimistic (Main conculusion).
D.
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 29 Jul 2006
Posts: 877
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 26 Jul 2007, 11:04
Its either B or D.
Now,second is the main conclusion...thats ok.

But how is first one an intermedate conclusion...it begins with they reason that since
Now,this is the argument of the depositors and not the author...so how is it an intermediate conclusion.

Can anyone explain??
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 17 May 2007
Posts: 179
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 26 Jul 2007, 11:14
I go with answer C here.
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 11 Jun 2007
Posts: 932
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 51 [0], given: 0

Re: bold face CR [#permalink] New post 26 Jul 2007, 20:51
ajisha wrote:
their own bank, the bank’s depositors, who had been worried by rumors that the bank faced impending financial collapse, have been greatly relieved. They reason that since top executives evidently have faith in the bank’s financial soundness, those worrisome rumors must be false. They might well be overoptimistic, however since corporate executives have sometimes bought shares in their own company in a calculated attempt to dispel negative rumors about the company’s health. In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?

A. The first summarizes the evidence used in the reasoning called into question by the argument; the second states the counterevidence on which the argument relies.
B. The first summarizes the evidence used in the reasoning called into question by the argument; the second is an intermediate conclusion supported by the evidence.
C. The first is an intermediate conclusion that forms part of the reasoning called into question by the argument; the second is evidence that undermines the support for this intermediate conclusion.
D. The first is an intermediate conclusion that forms part of the reasoning called into question by the argument; the second is the main conclusion of the argument.
E. The first is an intermediate conclusion that forms part of the reasoning called into question by the argument; the second states a further conclusion supported by this intermediate conclusion.


What is the OA? Thanks!
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 24 Sep 2006
Posts: 281
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 26 Jul 2007, 22:33
asaf gave a good explanation

Agree with D
_________________

AimHigher

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 13 May 2007
Posts: 252
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 26 Jul 2007, 23:02
C
  [#permalink] 26 Jul 2007, 23:02
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Bank depositors in the United States are allfinancially lys8207 0 23 Mar 2012, 11:16
Bank depositors in the US are all financially protected Mikko 0 29 Jun 2013, 08:35
3 Bank depositors in the United States are all financially lexis 30 08 May 2008, 11:45
Bank depositors in the United States are all financially zoom612 2 26 Jun 2006, 17:38
Bank depositors in the U.S. are all financially protected kdhong 9 17 Aug 2005, 20:42
Display posts from previous: Sort by

their own bank, the bank s depositors, who had been worried

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.