Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 19 Dec 2014, 19:42

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

There are more opera houses than there were two decades ago,

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 08 Oct 2010
Posts: 31
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

There are more opera houses than there were two decades ago, [#permalink] New post 25 Oct 2010, 21:35
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  5% (low)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 100% (01:24) wrong based on 9 sessions
There are more opera houses than there were two decades ago, and charitable contributions are on the rise. Average audiences for opera, however, have been declining for the past twenty years.

Which of the following. if true, best explains the discrepancy above?
A. In the past twenty years musical theater audiences have grown.
B. A change in the tax code has conferred certain advantages on charitable giving.
C. Constructions codes have been revised on a national level to promote the construction of cultural facilities.
D. there has been an emphasis on unamplified sound in opera.
E. The number of new works has declined in the past three decades.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Last edited by suhi on 26 Oct 2010, 23:59, edited 1 time in total.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 15 Apr 2010
Posts: 176
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 67 [0], given: 25

Re: opera house [#permalink] New post 25 Oct 2010, 22:03
B.

B. A change in the tax code has conferred certain advantages on charitable giving.
Hence there are more people (who are not necessarily interested in opera) making charitable contributions because of the tax advantages.
_________________

Give [highlight]KUDOS [/highlight] if you like my post.

Always do things which make you feel ALIVE!!!

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 08 Oct 2010
Posts: 31
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

Re: opera house [#permalink] New post 25 Oct 2010, 22:29
Even i thought its B. surprisingly the OA isnt B. plz gimme more feedback. because cant get any idea how that ans can be the OA.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Posts: 188
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 34 [0], given: 5

Re: opera house [#permalink] New post 26 Oct 2010, 02:29
IMO E.

P1: No. of Opera Houses have increased
P2: Average audiences for Opera have decreased.

The only way to explain this discrepancy is, if we consider that the No. of new Operas are decreasing. Hence let us say that:
Audience in 1990: 100
Audience in 2010: 1000

No. of new Operas in 1990: 50 ... hence the dedicated audience of 100 goes to each of the 50 Operas making the Total audience for that year as 5000
No. of new Operas in 2010: 4 … hence dedicated audience of 1000 goes to each of the 4 Operas making the Total audience for that year as 4000.

Thus the audience are declining as can be seen from the figures.
_________________

Please give me kudos, if you like the above post.
Thanks.

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 08 Oct 2010
Posts: 31
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

Re: opera house [#permalink] New post 26 Oct 2010, 23:58
OA is D...its from Princeton review

gosh...how one can think of such an ans....if someone understands plz help
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 18 Oct 2010
Posts: 93
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

Re: opera house [#permalink] New post 27 Oct 2010, 00:08
devashish wrote:
IMO E.

P1: No. of Opera Houses have increased
P2: Average audiences for Opera have decreased.

The only way to explain this discrepancy is, if we consider that the No. of new Operas are decreasing. Hence let us say that:
Audience in 1990: 100
Audience in 2010: 1000

No. of new Operas in 1990: 50 ... hence the dedicated audience of 100 goes to each of the 50 Operas making the Total audience for that year as 5000
No. of new Operas in 2010: 4 … hence dedicated audience of 1000 goes to each of the 4 Operas making the Total audience for that year as 4000.

Thus the audience are declining as can be seen from the figures.

well, i chose B and i even dont understand what D means...why its D?
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Status: Can't give up
Joined: 20 Dec 2009
Posts: 320
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 26 [0], given: 35

Re: opera house [#permalink] New post 27 Oct 2010, 05:04
A. In the past twenty years musical theater audiences have grown - "musical theater audiences growing cannot impact audiences in opera"
B. A change in the tax code has conferred certain advantages on charitable giving - out of scope but keep it.
C. Constructions codes have been revised on a national level to promote the construction of cultural facilities. - irrelevant to the QS.
D. there has been an emphasis on unamplified sound in opera - irrelevant
E. The number of new works has declined in the past three decades - the # of new opera works could have declined OR new works somewhere else could have declined. This is very attractive, but stretch to assume

But IMO it is B
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Status: Can't give up
Joined: 20 Dec 2009
Posts: 320
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 26 [0], given: 35

Re: opera house [#permalink] New post 27 Oct 2010, 05:15
maybe something is missing in the question stem. It is totally out of scope. The least we can assume is "the sound quality was bad that it decreased audiences to opera, but how can that start contributing to chairty????"

any experts pls could you help solve this?
Re: opera house   [#permalink] 27 Oct 2010, 05:15
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
2 For at least two decades or more previous to when the Veneti Zarrolou 1 13 Apr 2013, 05:57
After more than four decades of research and development, a khansfu 5 10 Jan 2006, 22:33
After more than four decades of research and development, a rahulraao 11 23 Nov 2005, 05:42
After more than four decades of research and development, a nakib77 6 06 Nov 2005, 11:22
After more than four decades of research and development, a perezhan 13 06 Apr 2005, 18:22
Display posts from previous: Sort by

There are more opera houses than there were two decades ago,

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.