Last visit was: 25 Apr 2024, 15:45 It is currently 25 Apr 2024, 15:45

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Kudos
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
User avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 06 Feb 2013
Posts: 35
Own Kudos [?]: 206 [83]
Given Kudos: 35
Send PM
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 26 Feb 2013
Posts: 124
Own Kudos [?]: 180 [31]
Given Kudos: 25
Send PM
Tutor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 14823
Own Kudos [?]: 64923 [15]
Given Kudos: 426
Location: Pune, India
Send PM
General Discussion
Director
Director
Joined: 17 Dec 2012
Posts: 589
Own Kudos [?]: 1519 [10]
Given Kudos: 20
Location: India
Send PM
Re: There is a 10% chance that it won't snow all winter long [#permalink]
5
Kudos
4
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
obs23 wrote:
There is a 10% chance that it won't snow all winter long. There is a 20% chance that schools will not be closed all winter long. What is the greatest possible probability that it will snow and schools will be closed during the winter?

(A) 55%
(B) 60%
(C) 70%
(D) 72%
(E) 80%

I have seen several explanations on this one and I cannot understand the point of intersection I guess...Has anyone seen similar problems they saw here (specifically with given probabilities) or perhaps I am looking for a parallel (gumballs, etc) to this problem.

There is one rule on dependent probability P(A) + P(B) - P(AB) but clearly this is not the case here. The dice are independent. With colored balls, we could calculate what happens after the balls taken away (when they are not replaced) and it makes sense. With this type of problem, I do not know what to precisely think of dependent probability :( And what is up with solving probability with overlapping sets or the matrix?

And what exactly happens when we multiply 90% and 80% conceptually? I mean what does that presume and why it is not correct? Basically, a thorough breakdown of this problem would be very helpful.

Please remember that I have seen other explanations, and my questions are based on them. Probably the best of them are:
"The greatest possible probability will occur when b is dependent on a. Thus it will be their intersection set. Hence answer = 0.8"

"They're asking for the greatest possible probability. This will occur if whenever it snows, schools close. This is a causation problem. That means schools will close only if it snows, but not all the time it snows. So you don't have to multiply .9*.8, because each time .8 occurs, .9 will be in effect as well."

I do not understand exactly what they mean...Anyway, I hope you see where I am aiming.


We have p (A n B) = p(A) + p(B) - p(A u B)

p(A) is the probability that it will snow
p(B) is the probability that the schools will close

p(A n B) will be maximum when p(A u B) is minimum but p(A u B) cannot be less than the higher of the p(A) and p(B) i.e, cannot be less than 0.9.

In the above case B is totally dependent on A. i.,e schools close whenever and only when it snows. So the p(AUB) effectively becomes p(A).

The answer is p(A n B) = 0.9+0.8-0.9= 0.8

In other words the greatest probability is the probability of B.
Tutor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 14823
Own Kudos [?]: 64923 [9]
Given Kudos: 426
Location: Pune, India
Send PM
Re: There is a 10% chance that it won't snow all winter long [#permalink]
4
Kudos
4
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
dina98 wrote:
Could someone please explain how P(A intersection B) is calculated differently from P(A U B)? Thanks


A intersection B is whatever is common between the two sets.

Either you will be given its value or if they are independent events, then P(A intersection B) = P(A) * P(B).

For mutually exclusive events, P(A intersection B) = 0. Mutually exclusive events are those which cannot happen at the same time such as "Getting heads on flipping a coin" and "Getting tails on flipping a coin".

When there is some dependence in the events, the maximum value the intersection can have is the lower of the two probabilities.
Say P(A) = 0.4 and P(B) = 0.7.
The maximum probability of intersection can be 0.4 because P(A) = 0.4.
The minimum value of P(A intersection B) will be 0.1 since probability cannot exceed 1 so P(A U B) is maximum 1.
1 = 0.4 + 0.7 - P(A intersection B)
P(A intersection B) = 0.1 (at least)

Actual value of P(A intersection B) will lie somewhere between 0.1 and 0.4 (inclusive)


A union B is the sum of whatever is common between them and the elements which are contained in one set only.
P(A U B) = P(A) + P(B) - P(A intersection B)
GMAT Tutor
Joined: 24 Jun 2008
Posts: 4128
Own Kudos [?]: 9244 [7]
Given Kudos: 91
 Q51  V47
Send PM
Re: There is a 10% chance that it won't snow all winter long [#permalink]
7
Kudos
Expert Reply
varotkorn wrote:

If the question were What is the MINIMUM probability that it will snow and schools will be closed during the winter?

Would the answer be 0.7 (using matrix/grid) or 0.72 (by assuming independent)?


You multiply probabilities when you have two unrelated ("independent") events, and want to know the probability both events will happen. Multiplication has nothing to do with finding "minimum" or "maximum" probabilities.

If you're asked to find the "minimum" or "maximum" probability two events occur, the events really must be *dependent* (related in some way). If they were independent, there's a single numerical answer to the question "what is the probability both events occur?" so there'd be no reason to ask for a "minimum" or "maximum". For example, it wouldn't make sense to ask "if you flip two coins, what is the minimum probability both coins turn up Heads?" because there is an exact answer to that question: it's 1/4. There's no "minimum" or "maximum" answer.

So if you're asked to find a minimum or maximum probability of two events occurring, the events will be dependent, and then you always need to use Venn diagram (or matrix, if you prefer) methods to answer. You'll just want to try to maximize or minimize the overlap in your Venn diagram, using the fact that the probabilities of all of the events must sum to 1. As you found, the minimum probability in this question is 0.7 (which you find by assuming at least one event must happen).

If you do multiply 0.9 and 0.8 in this question, all you are doing is finding one possible answer to the question "what is the probability both events occur?", the answer when the two events happen to be independent. The answer you find, 0.72, won't be the minimum or the maximum -- it will be somewhere in between the min and max.
User avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 07 Jan 2013
Posts: 29
Own Kudos [?]: 161 [4]
Given Kudos: 23
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GMAT 1: 570 Q46 V23
GMAT 2: 710 Q49 V38
GPA: 2.9
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
Send PM
Re: There is a 10% chance that it won't snow all winter long [#permalink]
4
Kudos
hi obs,

there are 2 events
1) p(A) (probability it will snow all longer)=0.1
2) p(B)(probability the school will remain close all winter longer)= 1- 0.2 = 0.8

now if you go by rule for joint sets p(A u B) = p(A)+p(B) - p(AandB)
therefore p(AandB)= 0.1 + 0.8 - p(A u B)

now you can just think that p(AandB) could only be max when B is subset of A thereby P(A u B) would be 0.1

hence max p(AandB) would be 0.8,

I hope i made sense
avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 23 May 2013
Posts: 76
Own Kudos [?]: 255 [4]
Given Kudos: 109
Send PM
Re: There is a 10% chance that it won't snow all winter long [#permalink]
4
Kudos
Hi Karishma

While i get the logic of your answer, i always understood that probability of event A and Probability of event B occurring is P(A)*P(B). So here is applied the same and got the answer as 0.9*0.8 = 0.72.
Whats wrong with it? Please help to explain.
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 24 Jul 2011
Posts: 127
Own Kudos [?]: 110 [3]
Given Kudos: 93
Location: India
GMAT 1: 570 Q50 V19
GMAT 2: 650 Q49 V28
GMAT 3: 690 Q50 V34
WE:Information Technology (Investment Banking)
Send PM
Re: There is a 10% chance that it won't snow all winter long [#permalink]
3
Kudos
Basically, the probability is 0.72 when both of the events are mutually exclusive. When they are dependent you got to use the equation

P(AUB) = P(A) + P(B) - P(A intersection B)
Director
Director
Joined: 17 Dec 2012
Posts: 589
Own Kudos [?]: 1519 [2]
Given Kudos: 20
Location: India
Send PM
Re: There is a 10% chance that it won't snow all winter long [#permalink]
1
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
obs23 wrote:
Helpful guys. Appreciate your efforts. Sravna just to clarify:

We have p (A n B) = p(A) + p(B) - p(A u B)

p(A) is the probability that it will snow
p(B) is the probability that the schools will close

Quote:
p(A n B) will be maximum when p(A u B) is minimum
You mean when p(A u B) maximized, don't you?

In other words, the P(ANB) is maximized when P(AORB) is maximized and this maximization happens only when B is completely dependent on A, becoming A and P(AORB)=P(B). Seem to make sense now. Hope I won't be trapped next time.


Hi,

I meant p(A u B) is minimized i.e., the probability either A or B occurring is minimum. This minimum is equal to the higher of p(A) and p(B) because it cannot be less than that. p(A) is the higher probability. So p(AUB) is equal to p(A).

So p(A n B) = p(A) + p(B) - p(A u B) becomes
p(A n B) = p(A) + p(B) -p(A)
p(A n B) = p(B)= 0.8
avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 08 Jun 2015
Posts: 86
Own Kudos [?]: 107 [2]
Given Kudos: 40
Send PM
Re: There is a 10% chance that it won't snow all winter long [#permalink]
1
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
obs23 wrote:
There is a 10% chance that it won't snow all winter long. There is a 20% chance that schools will not be closed all winter long. What is the greatest possible probability that it will snow and schools will be closed during the winter?

(A) 55%
(B) 60%
(C) 70%
(D) 72%
(E) 80%

I have seen several explanations on this one and I cannot understand the point of intersection I guess...Has anyone seen similar problems they saw here (specifically with given probabilities) or perhaps I am looking for a parallel (gumballs, etc) to this problem.

There is one rule on dependent probability P(A) + P(B) - P(AB) but clearly this is not the case here. The dice are independent. With colored balls, we could calculate what happens after the balls taken away (when they are not replaced) and it makes sense. With this type of problem, I do not know what to precisely think of dependent probability :( And what is up with solving probability with overlapping sets or the matrix?

And what exactly happens when we multiply 90% and 80% conceptually? I mean what does that presume and why it is not correct? Basically, a thorough breakdown of this problem would be very helpful.

Please remember that I have seen other explanations, and my questions are based on them. Probably the best of them are:
"The greatest possible probability will occur when b is dependent on a. Thus it will be their intersection set. Hence answer = 0.8"

"They're asking for the greatest possible probability. This will occur if whenever it snows, schools close. This is a causation problem. That means schools will close only if it snows, but not all the time it snows. So you don't have to multiply .9*.8, because each time .8 occurs, .9 will be in effect as well."

I do not understand exactly what they mean...Anyway, I hope you see where I am aiming.


The greatest probability translates as "take the range of probabilities of these two events occurring under different circumstances, and choose the greatest extreme."

If event B is fully dependent on event A, then the probability is equal to the smallest probability of either event A or B, 0.8.

If event B is not fully dependent on event A, then the maximum we can know for sure is 0.72, or event A * event B.

So, the range of possibilities is 0.72 to 0.8. The greatest possibility is 0.8 or 80%.
GMAT Tutor
Joined: 27 Oct 2017
Posts: 1905
Own Kudos [?]: 5582 [2]
Given Kudos: 236
WE:General Management (Education)
Send PM
Re: There is a 10% chance that it won't snow all winter long [#permalink]
2
Kudos
Expert Reply
Max probability of both event A & B = least value of A or B 
this is because P(A& B) = P(A)*P(B) , if the events are independent.
P(A& B) = P(A)*P(B/A) , if the events are independent.
now since the max value of probability for any event P(B) or P(B/A)= 1, hence max probability of both events = min of probability of individual events.
Here probability of snow P(A) =0.9
Probability of school closing, P(B) =0.8
Hence probability of their intersection =0.8.
Hope it is clear.
Please provide Kudos if u like the solution.

Sent from my 2014818 using GMAT Club Forum mobile app
User avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 06 Feb 2013
Posts: 35
Own Kudos [?]: 206 [1]
Given Kudos: 35
Send PM
Re: There is a 10% chance that it won't snow all winter long [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Helpful guys. Appreciate your efforts. Sravna just to clarify:

We have p (A n B) = p(A) + p(B) - p(A u B)

p(A) is the probability that it will snow
p(B) is the probability that the schools will close

Quote:
p(A n B) will be maximum when p(A u B) is minimum
You mean when p(A u B) maximized, don't you?

In other words, the P(ANB) is maximized when P(AORB) is maximized and this maximization happens only when B is completely dependent on A, becoming A and P(AORB)=P(B). Seem to make sense now. Hope I won't be trapped next time.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 14 Jul 2014
Posts: 126
Own Kudos [?]: 49 [0]
Given Kudos: 110
Location: United States
Schools: Duke '20 (D)
GMAT 1: 720 Q50 V37
GMAT 2: 600 Q48 V27
GPA: 3.2
Send PM
Re: There is a 10% chance that it won't snow all winter long [#permalink]
Could someone please explain how P(A intersection B) is calculated differently from P(A U B)? Thanks
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 28 Jan 2017
Posts: 365
Own Kudos [?]: 78 [0]
Given Kudos: 832
Send PM
Re: There is a 10% chance that it won't snow all winter long [#permalink]
Dear IanStewart GMATGuruNY VeritasKarishma Bunuel,

If the question were What is the MINIMUM probability that it will snow and schools will be closed during the winter?

Would the answer be 0.7 (using matrix/grid) or 0.72 (by assuming independent)?
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 11 May 2021
Posts: 272
Own Kudos [?]: 115 [0]
Given Kudos: 446
Send PM
Re: There is a 10% chance that it won't snow all winter long [#permalink]
Hey karishma - thanks for your explanation below.
However, why would we not multiply the two probabilities? I.e. 0.8 * 0.9 = 0.72 = 72% ? I marked 72% for both events to happen together. I did not see it from the sens you're seeing it. Can you help me understand a bit more about it? Thanks. Also as per @ianstewart's response above - how do we conclude the events in question are dependent or independent? Snowing and closing of schools are independent activities right? My thinking is that if there are 10 marbles (2 red 8 green) in a bag, and I want to draw out 2 red marbles one by one then my probability is 2/10*1/9. So such an event is dependent but here there is nothing as such which proves them dependent


KarishmaB wrote:
obs23 wrote:
There is a 10% chance that it won't snow all winter long. There is a 20% chance that schools will not be closed all winter long. What is the greatest possible probability that it will snow and schools will be closed during the winter?

(A) 55%
(B) 60%
(C) 70%
(D) 72%
(E) 80%

I have seen several explanations on this one and I cannot understand the point of intersection I guess...Has anyone seen similar problems they saw here (specifically with given probabilities) or perhaps I am looking for a parallel (gumballs, etc) to this problem.

There is one rule on dependent probability P(A) + P(B) - P(AB) but clearly this is not the case here. The dice are independent. With colored balls, we could calculate what happens after the balls taken away (when they are not replaced) and it makes sense. With this type of problem, I do not know what to precisely think of dependent probability :( And what is up with solving probability with overlapping sets or the matrix?

And what exactly happens when we multiply 90% and 80% conceptually? I mean what does that presume and why it is not correct? Basically, a thorough breakdown of this problem would be very helpful.

Please remember that I have seen other explanations, and my questions are based on them. Probably the best of them are:
"The greatest possible probability will occur when b is dependent on a. Thus it will be their intersection set. Hence answer = 0.8"

"They're asking for the greatest possible probability. This will occur if whenever it snows, schools close. This is a causation problem. That means schools will close only if it snows, but not all the time it snows. So you don't have to multiply .9*.8, because each time .8 occurs, .9 will be in effect as well."

I do not understand exactly what they mean...Anyway, I hope you see where I am aiming.


Ok, let's try to understand the question stem:

There is a 10% chance that it won't snow all winter long. (by the way, there is some ambiguity in this statement)
implies there is a 90% chance that it will snow all winter long i.e. 9 out of 10 winters it will snow all winter long.

There is a 20% chance that schools will not be closed all winter long.
implies there is an 80% chance that schools will be closed all winter long i.e. 8 out of 10 winters school will be closed all winter long.

What is the greatest possible probability that it will snow and schools will be closed during the winter?
Attachment:
Ques3.jpg


What is the greatest possible overlap between the two? The 8 winters when the school is closed, it should snow all winter long too. That's when the overlap will be maximum. So probability is 0.8
Intern
Intern
Joined: 15 Mar 2020
Posts: 7
Own Kudos [?]: 0 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: There is a 10% chance that it won't snow all winter long [#permalink]
snow no snow Total
school 10 10 20
No school 80 0 80
Total 90 10 100

To maximize 'no school and snow', I used it as zero, and then it shows as 80%.

Posted from my mobile device
GMAT Club Bot
Re: There is a 10% chance that it won't snow all winter long [#permalink]
Moderators:
Math Expert
92915 posts
Senior Moderator - Masters Forum
3137 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne