Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 16 Apr 2014, 08:03

Hurry Up:

Last day of registration for Dealing with a Ding - Webinar by GMATClub and Admissionado Consulting.


Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

There is no reason why the work of scientists has to be

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Director
Director
Joined: 29 Jul 2006
Posts: 877
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
There is no reason why the work of scientists has to be [#permalink] New post 04 Dec 2006, 11:42
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  5% (low)

Question Stats:

84% (02:07) correct 15% (00:04) wrong based on 13 sessions
There is no reason why the work of scientists has to be officially confirmed before being published. There is a system in place for the confirmation or disconfirmation of scientific finding, namely, the replication of results by other scientists. Poor scientific work on the part of any one scientist, which can include anything from careless reporting practices to fraud, is not harmful. It will be exposed and rendered harmless when other scientists conduct the experiments and obtain disconfirmatory results.
Which one of the following, if true, would weaken the argument?
(A) Scientific experiments can go unchallenged for many years before they are replicated.
(B) Most scientists work in universities, where their work is submitted to peer review before publication.
(C) Most scientists are under pressure to make their work accessible to the scrutiny of replication.
(D) In scientific experiments, careless reporting is more common than fraud.
(E) Most scientists work as part of a team rather than alone.

Please give reasons for ur choice....
Manager
Manager
Joined: 01 Feb 2006
Posts: 84
Location: New York
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 04 Dec 2006, 11:59
is it A?
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 17 Oct 2006
Posts: 439
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR-Scientists [#permalink] New post 04 Dec 2006, 12:34
vineetgupta wrote:
There is no reason why the work of scientists has to be officially confirmed before being published. There is a system in place for the confirmation or disconfirmation of scientific finding, namely, the replication of results by other scientists. Poor scientific work on the part of any one scientist, which can include anything from careless reporting practices to fraud, is not harmful. It will be exposed and rendered harmless when other scientists conduct the experiments and obtain disconfirmatory results.
Which one of the following, if true, would weaken the argument?
(A) Scientific experiments can go unchallenged for many years before they are replicated.
there is a possibilty of harm being done
(B) Most scientists work in universities, where their work is submitted to peer review before publication.
(C) Most scientists are under pressure to make their work accessible to the scrutiny of replication.
(D) In scientific experiments, careless reporting is more common than fraud.
(E) Most scientists work as part of a team rather than alone.

Please give reasons for ur choice....
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 08 Nov 2006
Posts: 70
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Re: CR-Scientists [#permalink] New post 04 Dec 2006, 18:23
vineetgupta wrote:
There is no reason why the work of scientists has to be officially confirmed before being published. There is a system in place for the confirmation or disconfirmation of scientific finding, namely, the replication of results by other scientists. Poor scientific work on the part of any one scientist, which can include anything from careless reporting practices to fraud, is not harmful. It will be exposed and rendered harmless when other scientists conduct the experiments and obtain disconfirmatory results.
Which one of the following, if true, would weaken the argument?
(A) Scientific experiments can go unchallenged for many years before they are replicated.
(B) Most scientists work in universities, where their work is submitted to peer review before publication.
(C) Most scientists are under pressure to make their work accessible to the scrutiny of replication.
(D) In scientific experiments, careless reporting is more common than fraud.
(E) Most scientists work as part of a team rather than alone.

Please give reasons for ur choice....



Argument is : There is no reason to confirm the work of the scientist becuase there is a system which keeps track of replications.So when other scientists come up with different results the previous results will be disconfirmed.

A: Irrelevant because the work can go unchallenged even after the results have been confirmed and published. History has shown several theories were proved wrong decades after they were published.

B: S

C:W

D,E:Irrelevant

C
_________________

------------------------------------------------------
"The future belongs to those who believe in the beauty of their dreams"

Intern
Intern
Joined: 25 Jul 2006
Posts: 44
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 04 Dec 2006, 20:52
Its A for me...
Director
Director
User avatar
Affiliations: FRM Charter holder
Joined: 02 Dec 2006
Posts: 736
Schools: Stanford, Chicago Booth, Babson College
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 4

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR-Scientists [#permalink] New post 04 Dec 2006, 21:14
joinforum wrote:
vineetgupta wrote:
There is no reason why the work of scientists has to be officially confirmed before being published. There is a system in place for the confirmation or disconfirmation of scientific finding, namely, the replication of results by other scientists. Poor scientific work on the part of any one scientist, which can include anything from careless reporting practices to fraud, is not harmful. It will be exposed and rendered harmless when other scientists conduct the experiments and obtain disconfirmatory results.
Which one of the following, if true, would weaken the argument?
(A) Scientific experiments can go unchallenged for many years before they are replicated.
(B) Most scientists work in universities, where their work is submitted to peer review before publication.
(C) Most scientists are under pressure to make their work accessible to the scrutiny of replication.
(D) In scientific experiments, careless reporting is more common than fraud.
(E) Most scientists work as part of a team rather than alone.

Please give reasons for ur choice....



Argument is : There is no reason to confirm the work of the scientist becuase there is a system which keeps track of replications.So when other scientists come up with different results the previous results will be disconfirmed.

A: Irrelevant because the work can go unchallenged even after the results have been confirmed and published. History has shown several theories were proved wrong decades after they were published.

B: S

C:W

D,E:Irrelevant

C


I think A is the answer because, for years scientists and public at large might consider findings of a particular publication as true and spend their time, funds, and energy inappropriately. Hence, there is a reason to confirm the work of the scientist.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 25 Sep 2006
Posts: 153
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink] New post 04 Dec 2006, 21:27
I think A

C strengthen the argument
_________________

livin in a prison island...

VP
VP
Joined: 21 Mar 2006
Posts: 1136
Location: Bangalore
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 17 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 05 Dec 2006, 00:12
Give me A!
- B, C Irrelevant.
B: Quite obviously
C: The fact that most scientists are under pressure to make their work accessible to replication does not say whether unconfirmed results are harmful or not.
- D Irrelevant comparison
- E : I took awhile to eliminate this. But I guess this strengthens the argument. If most scientists work is teams then they could already be verifying each others results. So no need for explicit replication. I know this is a bit far fetched but it does not weaken the argument for sure!
Director
Director
Joined: 29 Jul 2006
Posts: 877
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 0

GMAT Tests User
 [#permalink] New post 05 Dec 2006, 05:08
thanks...the OA is A.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 01 Dec 2011
Posts: 69
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 12

GMAT Tests User
Re: There is no reason why the work of scientists has to be [#permalink] New post 05 Feb 2012, 11:01
+A
_________________

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kudos

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 15 Sep 2009
Posts: 271
GMAT 1: 750 Q V
Followers: 8

Kudos [?]: 49 [0], given: 6

Re: There is no reason why the work of scientists has to be [#permalink] New post 27 Jun 2012, 03:58
Straight A.

If scientists' work can go on for several years without being verified? Then that weakens the assertion that scientists' work should not be scrutinized.

Cheers,
Der alte Fritz.
_________________

+1 Kudos me - I'm half Irish, half Prussian.

1 KUDOS received
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
User avatar
Joined: 28 Nov 2011
Posts: 305
Followers: 269

Kudos [?]: 374 [1] , given: 2

GMAT Tests User
Re: There is no reason why the work of scientists has to be [#permalink] New post 28 Jun 2012, 13:55
1
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
The conclusion: no official confirmation of scientific work is not a problem because replication will sort out any inconsistencies.

Any answer choice that shows the replication process is somehow faulty will be sufficient to weaken the conclusion.

(A) Scientific experiments can go unchallenged for many years before they are replicated.

If (A) is true, then the potential inconsistencies can go undetected for years. Such an occurrence can be very harmful. Essentially, erroneous information is being bandied about for years before any follow-up experiments can show this to be the case. Therefore, replication can only be successful if it is actually employed, and (A) successfully weakens the conclusion.

(B) Most scientists work in universities, where their work is submitted to peer review before publication.

This does not address the argument.

(C) Most scientists are under pressure to make their work accessible to the scrutiny of replication.

This answer choice would strengthen the argument, if anything. Even less need for confirmation.

(D) In scientific experiments, careless reporting is more common than fraud.

While this may be true, the argument contends that replication will take care of this careless reporting.

(E) Most scientists work as part of a team rather than alone.

This does not address the argument.
_________________

Christopher Lele
Magoosh Test Prep


Image

Image

Manager
Manager
Joined: 05 Sep 2012
Posts: 79
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 17

Re: There is no reason why the work of scientists has to be [#permalink] New post 16 Feb 2013, 04:24
POE leads to E.

Conclusion: Formal system for approving or disproving is not required.

We have to find the flaw in argument. A gives the flaw.
Re: There is no reason why the work of scientists has to be   [#permalink] 16 Feb 2013, 04:24
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
New posts There is no reason why the work of scientists has to be chunjuwu 8 28 Sep 2004, 07:55
Popular new posts One reason why European music has had such a strong MA 14 02 Mar 2005, 23:07
New posts One reason why European music has had such a strong crazyfin 7 28 Sep 2005, 02:51
Popular new posts One reason why European music has had such a strong cdm2006 14 01 May 2006, 07:19
New posts There is no reason why the work of scientists has to be garimavyas 1 12 May 2011, 23:20
Display posts from previous: Sort by

There is no reason why the work of scientists has to be

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.