This one has alreadhy been discussed here: : GMAT Sentence Correction (SC)
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 16 Jan 2017, 07:19

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# This one has alreadhy been discussed here:

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

SVP
Joined: 16 Jul 2009
Posts: 1628
Schools: CBS
WE 1: 4 years (Consulting)
Followers: 42

Kudos [?]: 1053 [0], given: 2

### Show Tags

04 Jul 2010, 09:56
00:00

Difficulty:

25% (medium)

Question Stats:

69% (01:54) correct 31% (01:06) wrong based on 35 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

This one has alreadhy been discussed here: grounds-sc-70795.html
OA is D.
However, "it" can refer to both "a judge" or "the ban" and is therefore ambigous.
Could anybody clarify?

Nine months after the county banned jet skis and other water bikes
from the tranquil waters of Puget Sound, a judge overturned the ban on the
grounds of violating state laws for allowing the use of personal watercraft
on common waterways
A. of violating state laws for allowing
B. of their violating state laws to allow
C. that it violates state laws that allowed
D. that it violated state laws allowing
E. that state laws were being violated allowing
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

The sky is the limit
800 is the limit

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

If you have any questions
New!
Director
Status: Impossible is not a fact. It's an opinion. It's a dare. Impossible is nothing.
Affiliations: University of Chicago Booth School of Business
Joined: 26 Nov 2009
Posts: 997
Location: Singapore
Followers: 22

Kudos [?]: 746 [0], given: 36

### Show Tags

04 Jul 2010, 10:27
D is correct.

"it" is not ambiguous in D. It cannot be used to refer to human being (the judge) - unless its a baby.
_________________

Please press kudos if you like my post.

SVP
Joined: 16 Jul 2009
Posts: 1628
Schools: CBS
WE 1: 4 years (Consulting)
Followers: 42

Kudos [?]: 1053 [0], given: 2

### Show Tags

04 Jul 2010, 11:09
nusmavrik wrote:
D is correct.

"it" is not ambiguous in D. It cannot be used to refer to human being (the judge) - unless its a baby.

ah ok! thanks.

By the way, you can use "it" to refer to a baby??
_________________

The sky is the limit
800 is the limit

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Director
Status: Impossible is not a fact. It's an opinion. It's a dare. Impossible is nothing.
Affiliations: University of Chicago Booth School of Business
Joined: 26 Nov 2009
Posts: 997
Location: Singapore
Followers: 22

Kudos [?]: 746 [0], given: 36

### Show Tags

04 Jul 2010, 21:48
That depends on the context - since you don't know whether baby is "he" or "she" you can use "it". Lets say you know the baby's name John or Sheena then its wrong to use "it" to refer to baby.

Sheena is so cute. It is a very cute child. -----> wrong. you have to use the personal pronoun "she"
She is a very cute child.

noboru wrote:
nusmavrik wrote:
D is correct.

"it" is not ambiguous in D. It cannot be used to refer to human being (the judge) - unless its a baby.

ah ok! thanks.

By the way, you can use "it" to refer to a baby??

_________________

Please press kudos if you like my post.

Manager
Joined: 08 Jan 2010
Posts: 194
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 13

### Show Tags

31 Jul 2010, 04:15
D........clearly .........."it" refers to a thing so no ambiguity as explained above
Manager
Joined: 20 Jul 2010
Posts: 198
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 114 [0], given: 7

### Show Tags

31 Jul 2010, 07:53
I had eliminated C and D initially considering "it" to be ambiguous.
However, nusmarvik reasoning helped me here..

Thanks man..

D is the answer in this case..
_________________

Gotta hit the 700 score this time... 3rd time lucky !
Give me some kudos... Like you, even I need them badly

SVP
Joined: 16 Jul 2009
Posts: 1628
Schools: CBS
WE 1: 4 years (Consulting)
Followers: 42

Kudos [?]: 1053 [0], given: 2

### Show Tags

31 Jul 2010, 08:27
so the idiom is on the grounds that? Is there any other possible construction? For example, on the grounds of?
Thanks
_________________

The sky is the limit
800 is the limit

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Manager
Joined: 20 Jul 2010
Posts: 198
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 114 [0], given: 7

### Show Tags

31 Jul 2010, 11:07
"grounds for" is the correct usage.. but in this case, there is no "grounds for" choice..
tell me how would you apply the idiom rule here !
_________________

Gotta hit the 700 score this time... 3rd time lucky !
Give me some kudos... Like you, even I need them badly

Manager
Joined: 07 Apr 2009
Posts: 158
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 100 [0], given: 5

### Show Tags

31 Jul 2010, 12:10
that is necessary here, so CDE, E uses being so out, CD , Now state laws that allowed makes different sense.
Allowing is better here. D
Manager
Joined: 03 May 2015
Posts: 116
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 48

### Show Tags

15 Aug 2015, 16:36
Request you not to write your queries/answers/opinions in question window. It prevents ppl from analysing the question. The whole purpose of GMAT Club forum goes wasted by doing so.
Re: This one has alreadhy been discussed here:   [#permalink] 15 Aug 2015, 16:36
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
1 This one has already been discussed here: 1 17 Jul 2010, 13:00
3 This one has already been discussed here: 10 07 Jul 2010, 10:16
1 This one has already been discussed here: 5 03 Jul 2010, 07:16
1 This one has already been discussed here: sound-77588.html 11 02 Jul 2010, 10:59
4 Here is another one that has not been discussed in detail on 18 18 Jul 2008, 12:54
Display posts from previous: Sort by