Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!
Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club
Registration gives you:
Tests
Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.
Applicant Stats
View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more
Books/Downloads
Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
This problem is not easy [#permalink]
30 Aug 2010, 11:18
00:00
A
B
C
D
E
Difficulty:
(N/A)
Question Stats:
0% (00:00) correct
100% (02:14) wrong based on 1 sessions
Given a list of known arithmetic mean and standard deviation \(x_1,x_2,...,x_n\) find a number \(x_n_+_1\) such that it will not change the standard deviation of the list. I have the solution, but because I am new to the forum I have to wait five days before I can give the website.
Re: This problem is not easy [#permalink]
30 Aug 2010, 11:57
trx123 wrote:
Given a list of known arithmetic mean and standard deviation \(x_1,x_2,...,x_n\) find a number \(x_n_+_1\) such that it will not change the standard deviation of the list. I have the solution, but because I am new to the forum I have to wait five days before I can give the website.
If the difference between the new element and the arithmetic mean is equal to the standard deviation then the deviation wont be changed by the addition of new entry. _________________
Re: This problem is not easy [#permalink]
30 Aug 2010, 14:04
gurpreetsingh, your answer is approximately correct only for large n. The exact answer is: \(x_n_+_1=\mu_n\pm\sigma_n\sqrt{\frac{n+1}{n}}\) The derivation of this formula is not straightforward and took me quite some time. I have the derivation, but unfortunately cannot post my website address yet because I just joined the forum today.
Re: This problem is not easy [#permalink]
30 Aug 2010, 14:23
But why is the mean in the n and n+1 case the same? a? that should change...I think the idea is to equate both the standard deviation formula and calculate what the new value should look like.. But I doubt if this is GMAT type... _________________
Re: This problem is not easy [#permalink]
30 Aug 2010, 14:59
gurpreetsingh, Your derivation is surprisingly similar to my first attempt, and it happens to be correct as an approximation only for large n. But there is a flaw in this approach, because you are assuming that the mean is the same in both lists, which is not true.
mainhoon, You are right, the mean will change, and that is the flaw in gurpreetsingh derivation. The derivation of the exact formula is quite involved. Also, I am sure this is not a GMAT question.
Re: This problem is not easy [#permalink]
30 Aug 2010, 16:32
The Problem: Find a number, such that when added to a list of numbers will not change the standard deviation of the original list.
The solution: Define the list of numbers as: \($x_1 ,x_2 , \cdots x_n ,x_{n + 1}$\) where \($x_{n + 1} $\) is the number added to the list. The mean and the standard deviation of the original list are: \(\bar x_n = \frac{1} {n}\sum\limits_{i = 1}^n {x_i } \\) \(\sigma _n ^2 = \frac{1} {{n - 1}}\sum\limits_{i = 1}^n {\left( {x_i - \bar x_n } \right)^2 } \\) After \($x_{n + 1} $\) is added to the original list, the mean and the standard deviation of the new list are: \(\bar x_{n + 1} = \frac{1} {{n + 1}}\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{n + 1} {x_i } \\) \(\sigma _{n + 1} ^2 = \frac{1} {n}\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{n + 1} {\left( {x_i - \bar x_{n + 1} } \right)^2 } \\)
We want to find \($x_{n + 1} $\)
such that \($\sigma _n ^2 = \sigma _{n + 1} ^2 $\)
therefore, \(\frac{1} {{n - 1}}\sum\limits_{i = 1}^n {\left( {x_i - \bar x_n } \right)^2 } = \frac{1} {n}\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{n + 1} {\left( {x_i - \bar x_{n + 1} } \right)^2 } \\) The sum of terms up to n is \(\sum\limits_{i = 1}^n {x_i = n\bar x_n } \\) and the sum of terms up to n+1 is \(\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{n + 1} {x_i = (n + 1)\bar x_{n + 1} } \\) Subtracting \($x_{n + 1}$\)
The “3 golden nuggets” of MBA admission process With ten years of experience helping prospective students with MBA admissions and career progression, I will be writing this blog through...
You know what’s worse than getting a ding at one of your dreams schools . Yes its getting that horrid wait-listed email . This limbo is frustrating as hell . Somewhere...