Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

 It is currently 20 Oct 2016, 12:35

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Though sucking zinc lozenges has been promoted as treatment

Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Intern
Joined: 09 Nov 2004
Posts: 13
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 1

Re: Though sucking zinc lozenges has been promoted as treatment [#permalink]

Show Tags

22 Nov 2011, 02:53
C for me too. Thanks
Senior Manager
Joined: 13 Aug 2010
Posts: 314
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 1

Re: Though sucking zinc lozenges has been promoted as treatment [#permalink]

Show Tags

25 Nov 2011, 01:32
+1 for C
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10228
Followers: 855

Kudos [?]: 187 [0], given: 0

Re: Though sucking zinc lozenges has been promoted as treatment [#permalink]

Show Tags

12 Jun 2014, 14:01
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Manager
Joined: 17 Jul 2013
Posts: 110
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 67

Re: Though sucking zinc lozenges has been promoted as treatment [#permalink]

Show Tags

14 Jun 2014, 08:01
well explained mashtrap ... kudos for you
Intern
Joined: 23 Jun 2011
Posts: 22
Concentration: Finance, Other
WE: Information Technology (Health Care)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 102

Re: Though sucking zinc lozenges has been promoted as treatment [#permalink]

Show Tags

08 Jun 2015, 09:17
zz0vlb wrote:
Though sucking zinc lozenges has been promoted as treatment for the common cold, research has revealed no consistant effect. Recently,however, a zinc gel applied nasally has been shown
to greatly reduce the duration of colds. Since the gel contains zinc in the same form and concentration as the lozenges, the greater the effectiveness of the gel must be due to the fact that cold virus tend to concentrate in the nose, not the mouth.

Which of the following, if true , most sesiously weakens the argument?

A. Expiremental subjects who used the zinc gel not only had colds of shorter duration but also had less sever symptoms than did those who used a gel that did not contain zinc.
B. The mechanism by which zinc effects the viruses that caused the common cold has not been conclusively established.
C. to make them palatable, zinc lozenges generally contains other ingredients, such as citric acid,, that can interfer with the chemical activity of zinc.
D. no Zinc based remedy can have any effect unless it is taken or applied within 48 hrs of the onset of cold symptoms.
E. Drug company researchers experimenting with nasal spray beased on zinc have found that it has much the same effect on colds as the gel does.

[Reveal] Spoiler:
C

Please, I need explaination whether A or E weakens the argument, if not why??

Both A and E are out of scope.

A : talks about the gel that don't contain zinc. OFS

E: talks about nasal spray,which is not of our concern. OFS

D: OFS

B: OFS

Optimus Prep Instructor
Joined: 06 Nov 2014
Posts: 1706
Followers: 46

Kudos [?]: 355 [0], given: 21

Re: Though sucking zinc lozenges has been promoted as treatment [#permalink]

Show Tags

11 Jun 2015, 02:16
Though sucking zinc lozenges has been promoted as treatment for the common cold, research has revealed no consistent effect. Recently,however, a zinc gel applied nasally has been shown
to greatly reduce the duration of colds. Since the gel contains zinc in the same form and concentration as the lozenges, the greater the effectiveness of the gel must be due to the fact that cold virus tend to concentrate in the nose, not the mouth.

Which of the following, if true , most seriously weakens the argument?

The argument is that zinc works better in the nose than in the mouth because the cold virus concentrates in the nose. The statement that weakens the argument will provide a different explanation for the efficacy of zinc in the nose compared to the mouth.

A. Experimental subjects who used the zinc gel not only had colds of shorter duration but also had less sever symptoms than did those who used a gel that did not contain zinc.out of scope - We are not interested in comparing zinc and no zinc, nor the specific effects of zinc.
B. The mechanism by which zinc effects the viruses that caused the common cold has not been conclusively established. The mechanism of zinc is out of scope.
C. to make them palatable, zinc lozenges generally contains other ingredients, such as citric acid, that can interfere with the chemical activity of zinc. This provides an alternative explanation for zinc's increased efficacy in the nose compared to the mouth. In the mouth zinc's efficacy is reduced by chemical activity with citric acid.
D. no Zinc based remedy can have any effect unless it is taken or applied within 48 hrs of the onset of cold symptoms. The time frame in which zinc-based remedies are applied is out of scope.
E. Drug company researchers experimenting with nasal spray based on zinc have found that it has much the same effect on colds as the gel does. There's no mention here of oral zinc remedies. This is only comparing two ways to apply zinc to the nose.
_________________

Janielle Williams

Customer Support

Special Offer: $80-100/hr. Online Private Tutoring GMAT On Demand Course$299
Free Online Trial Hour

Intern
Joined: 03 Oct 2012
Posts: 31
WE: Other (Retail Banking)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 174

Re: Though sucking zinc lozenges has been promoted as treatment [#permalink]

Show Tags

12 Jun 2015, 07:01
The correct answer choice is C. The argument contains casualty and uses casualty as an assumption linking the premise and the conclusion. The premise says that since the amount of zinc used is same for both medications, and since effects are different. But answer choice C is introducing new information about lozenge, saying that it contains some other things that can interfere with the chemical activity of zinc.
Joined: 24 Oct 2012
Posts: 198
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 83 [0], given: 45

Re: Though sucking zinc lozenges has been promoted as treatment [#permalink]

Show Tags

15 Jun 2015, 08:47
Cause and Effect passage.
Argument says, Cause (Application of Zinc in nose not in mouth) has created an effect ( Consistent result, to tackle cold).

typical Weakener for CE passage can be any of the following
1. Alternate cause
2. Effect causing Cause
3. Effect happen before cause.

Lets try to find the above pattern in option choice.
Only Option C, gives me the alternate cause for the effect.

Hence Option c is more appropriate.
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10228
Followers: 855

Kudos [?]: 187 [0], given: 0

Re: Though sucking zinc lozenges has been promoted as treatment [#permalink]

Show Tags

30 Jun 2016, 15:13
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Senior Manager
Joined: 02 Mar 2012
Posts: 369
Schools: Schulich '16
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 57 [0], given: 4

Re: Though sucking zinc lozenges has been promoted as treatment [#permalink]

Show Tags

01 Jul 2016, 09:34
C

we need to weaken here.for strengthen choice E is clear winner.

C says the the chemical zinc interferes with the ingredients in the lozenges .So the activity is not that much as said.

this weakens the possibility of the virus accumulating in the nose.Had zinc in lozenges been inert it would have same effect as gel
Manager
Joined: 18 Jun 2016
Posts: 91
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, Entrepreneurship
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 68

Re: Though sucking zinc lozenges has been promoted as treatment [#permalink]

Show Tags

15 Aug 2016, 18:41
zz0vlb wrote:
Though sucking zinc lozenges has been promoted as treatment for the common cold, research has revealed no consistant effect. Recently,however, a zinc gel applied nasally has been shown to greatly reduce the duration of colds. Since the gel contains zinc in the same form and concentration as the lozenges, the greater the effectiveness of the gel must be due to the fact that cold virus tend to concentrate in the nose, not the mouth.

Which of the following, if true , most sesiously weakens the argument?

A. Expiremental subjects who used the zinc gel not only had colds of shorter duration but also had less sever symptoms than did those who used a gel that did not contain zinc.
B. The mechanism by which zinc effects the viruses that caused the common cold has not been conclusively established.
C. to make them palatable, zinc lozenges generally contains other ingredients, such as citric acid,, that can interfer with the chemical activity of zinc.
D. no Zinc based remedy can have any effect unless it is taken or applied within 48 hrs of the onset of cold symptoms.
E. Drug company researchers experimenting with nasal spray beased on zinc have found that it has much the same effect on colds as the gel does.

[Reveal] Spoiler:
C

Please, I need explaination whether A or E weakens the argument, if not why??

Data : zinc lozenges taken orally is not consistently effective medicine . Zinc gel applied nasally is effective.
Conclusion : virus must be in nasal cavities.

Any statement that shows zinc lozegnes as effective as zinc gel should be answer.
Statement C does that.
A -> Duration and symptoms are not part of data. Maybe longer the duration, weaker the virus
E -> Nasal spray based on zinc. Outside info. (ignore it)
_________________

If my post was helpful, feel free to give kudos!

Intern
Joined: 21 Jul 2016
Posts: 19
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Operations
WE: Other (Computer Software)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 6

Re: Though sucking zinc lozenges has been promoted as treatment [#permalink]

Show Tags

14 Oct 2016, 02:09

The argument concludes that nose has more viruses than mouth on the simple observation that, gel was more effective on being used.

However, it is possible that mouth has equal or more viruses than nose and its just that, medicine taken to treat, is not equally effective.
Re: Though sucking zinc lozenges has been promoted as treatment   [#permalink] 14 Oct 2016, 02:09

Go to page   Previous    1   2   [ 32 posts ]

Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Sucking zinc lozenges has been promoted as a treatment for 2 13 May 2013, 05:14
4 Though sucking zinc lozenges has been promoted as a 13 11 Nov 2008, 15:52
Q1 - Though sucking zinc lozenges has been promoted as a 5 30 Oct 2007, 00:11
Though sucking zinc lozenges has been promoted as a 13 11 Jul 2007, 18:57
6 Though sucking zinc lozenges has been promoted as a 16 11 Dec 2006, 17:13
Display posts from previous: Sort by