Though they soon will, patients should not have a legal : GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR)
Check GMAT Club App Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases http://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 09 Dec 2016, 03:00

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Though they soon will, patients should not have a legal

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 29 Aug 2003
Posts: 240
Location: MI
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 26 [4] , given: 0

Though they soon will, patients should not have a legal [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Dec 2003, 11:31
4
KUDOS
20
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

51% (02:52) correct 49% (02:22) wrong based on 601 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Though they soon will, patients should not have a legal right to see their medical records. As a doctor, I see two reasons for this. First, giving them access will be time-wasting because it will significantly reduce the amount of time that medical staff can spend on more important duties, by forcing them to retrieve and return files. Second, if my experience is anything to go by, no patients are going to ask for access to their records anyway.

Which one of the following, if true, establishes that the doctor's second reason does not cancel out the first?

(A) The new law will require that doctors, when seeing a patient in their office, must be ready to produce the patient's records immediately, not just ready to retrieve them.
(B) The task of retrieving and returning files would fall to the lowest-paid member of a doctor's office staff.
(C) Any patients who asked to see their medical records would also insist on having details they did not understand explained to them.
(D) The new law does not rule out that doctors may charge patients for extra expenses incurred specifically in order to comply with the new law.
(E) Some doctors have all allowing their patients access to their medical records, but those doctors' patients took no advantage of this policy.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Last edited by Zarrolou on 17 Jun 2013, 03:00, edited 1 time in total.
If you have any questions
New!
CEO
Joined: 15 Aug 2003
Posts: 3460
Followers: 67

Kudos [?]: 855 [0], given: 781

Re: CR - Medical Records [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Dec 2003, 11:40
asandeep wrote:
Though they soon will, patients should not have a legal right to see their medical records. As a doctor, I see two reasons for this. First, giving them access will be time-wasting because it will significantly reduce the amount of time that medical staff can spend on more important duties, by forcing them to retrieve and return files. Second, if my experience is anything to go by, no patients are going to ask for access to their records anyway.┬б┬▒

Which one of the following, if true, establishes that the doctor┬б┬пs second reason does not cancel out the first?

(A) The new law will require that doctors, when seeing a patient in their office, must be ready to produce the patient┬б┬пs records immediately, not just ready to retrieve them.

(B) The task of retrieving and returning files would fall to the lowest-paid member of a doctor┬б┬пs office staff.

(C) Any patients who asked to see their medical records would also insist on having details they did not understand explained to them.

(D) The new law does not rule out that doctors may charge patients for extra expenses incurred specifically in order to comply with the new law.

(E) Some doctors have all allowing their patients access to their medical records, but those doctors┬б┬п patients took no advantage of this policy.

A is best.

The doctor should be ready..whether or not the patients want access.

so the staff has to retrieve it anyway.

hope this makes sense.
Manager
Joined: 29 Aug 2003
Posts: 240
Location: MI
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 26 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

15 Dec 2003, 12:33
Intern
Joined: 13 Jul 2012
Posts: 8
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 2

Re: Though they soon will, patients should not have a legal [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Jun 2013, 22:14
what does 'cancel out' mean here ?
I think 'Cancel out' is not formal enough to be used here
BSchool Forum Moderator
Joined: 24 Aug 2011
Posts: 1440
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, Strategy
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V34
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V35
GMAT 3: 760 Q50 V42
GPA: 3.35
WE: Consulting (Computer Software)
Followers: 297

Kudos [?]: 1238 [0], given: 816

Re: Though they soon will, patients should not have a legal [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Jun 2013, 02:55
I am not sure what to make of this question
_________________

ISB Class of 2017 | ISB Preparation Kit
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
ISB Class of 2016 | GMAT Retake Debrief
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
ISB Class of 2015 | GMAT Debrief
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

VP
Status: Far, far away!
Joined: 02 Sep 2012
Posts: 1123
Location: Italy
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.8
Followers: 180

Kudos [?]: 1912 [1] , given: 219

Re: Though they soon will, patients should not have a legal [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Jun 2013, 03:06
1
KUDOS
ankurgupta03 wrote:
I am not sure what to make of this question

Hi ankurgupta03 ,

the passage states two reasons:
1) Giving them access will be time-wasting.

The second one seems to exclude the other, and we are asked to find a case in which BOTH are valid, hence the second does not cancel out the first.

A simple case is the one in which for every visit a doctor makes, he has to be ready to give access to the documents, regardless of whether the patient asked for them.
In this particular case, both reasons are valid so the second does not cancel the first.

_________________

It is beyond a doubt that all our knowledge that begins with experience.

Kant , Critique of Pure Reason

Tips and tricks: Inequalities , Mixture | Review: MGMAT workshop
Strategy: SmartGMAT v1.0 | Questions: Verbal challenge SC I-II- CR New SC set out !! , My Quant

Rules for Posting in the Verbal Forum - Rules for Posting in the Quant Forum[/size][/color][/b]

Intern
Joined: 03 Jul 2013
Posts: 48
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 9

Re: Though they soon will, patients should not have a legal [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Aug 2013, 03:28
totally blown away. i could not get me head around this question!

EXPERTS!

can someone explain what is wrong with C and D
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10444
Followers: 886

Kudos [?]: 191 [0], given: 0

Re: Though they soon will, patients should not have a legal [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Jan 2015, 06:25
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10444
Followers: 886

Kudos [?]: 191 [0], given: 0

Re: Though they soon will, patients should not have a legal [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Apr 2016, 21:18
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Intern
Joined: 01 Sep 2016
Posts: 9
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 24

Re: Though they soon will, patients should not have a legal [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Sep 2016, 08:32
asandeep wrote:
Though they soon will, patients should not have a legal right to see their medical records. As a doctor, I see two reasons for this. First, giving them access will be time-wasting because it will significantly reduce the amount of time that medical staff can spend on more important duties, by forcing them to retrieve and return files. Second, if my experience is anything to go by, no patients are going to ask for access to their records anyway.

Which one of the following, if true, establishes that the doctor's second reason does not cancel out the first?

(A) The new law will require that doctors, when seeing a patient in their office, must be ready to produce the patient's records immediately, not just ready to retrieve them.
(B) The task of retrieving and returning files would fall to the lowest-paid member of a doctor's office staff.
(C) Any patients who asked to see their medical records would also insist on having details they did not understand explained to them.
(D) The new law does not rule out that doctors may charge patients for extra expenses incurred specifically in order to comply with the new law.
(E) Some doctors have all allowing their patients access to their medical records, but those doctors' patients took no advantage of this policy.

I don't understand how A is the answer..pls anyone elaborate..
Re: Though they soon will, patients should not have a legal   [#permalink] 16 Sep 2016, 08:32
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
3 Patient: Pharmacists maintain that doctors should not be permitted 2 26 Mar 2016, 03:00
Doctors in Britain have long suspected that patients who 4 01 Jul 2009, 00:47
Doctors in Britain have long suspected that patients who 2 31 May 2009, 05:23
2 Doctors in Britain have long suspected that patients who 8 04 Feb 2009, 22:07
54 Doctors in Britain have long suspected that patients who 38 16 Aug 2008, 15:09
Display posts from previous: Sort by