So I have pretty much narrowed my decision to BC, BU, and USC (for personal/family reasons I ruled out WUSTL and ND).
BC gave me 45k (total tuition is 68k).
BU gave me 30k (total tuition is 79k).
USC gave me 47k (total tuition is 94k).
Darden interview is Friday but I'd guess I'm not going to get in.
I want to do corporate finance and I don't mind the Boston area and I can definitely work in the LA area. Is there any compelling argument for me to take USC with half tution over BC with over 2/3 tuition? And I can't find any reason to take BU over BC, either.
I look forward to hearing your thoughts!
Boston College MBA '12