Find all School-related info fast with the new School-Specific MBA Forum

It is currently 01 Aug 2014, 22:57

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Thousands who suffer heart attacks each year die before

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 13 Jul 2010
Posts: 169
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 16 [0], given: 7

Re: CR: heart attack [#permalink] New post 09 Dec 2010, 08:11
Agree with A. Thought of E for a second because it caused other health problems to patients (even though not death) but it also only referred to some people instead of the greater majority.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 19 Oct 2010
Posts: 274
Location: India
GMAT 1: 560 Q36 V31
GPA: 3
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 27

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR: heart attack [#permalink] New post 12 Jan 2011, 07:24
Option A. This is the only choice the picks a hole in the spokesman's reasoning that the drug will save lives of heart attack victims.
_________________

petrifiedbutstanding

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 19 Oct 2010
Posts: 274
Location: India
GMAT 1: 560 Q36 V31
GPA: 3
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 27

GMAT Tests User
Re: CR: heart attack [#permalink] New post 12 Jan 2011, 07:25
Of course, it picks a hole with reference to the passage above.
_________________

petrifiedbutstanding

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 21 Nov 2010
Posts: 133
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 12

Re: CR: heart attack [#permalink] New post 01 Dec 2011, 23:30
spriya wrote:
fiesta wrote:
Thousands who suffer heart attacks each year die before reaching a hospital or clinic where they can benefit from the drugs that dissolve clots in coronary arteries. The Food and Drug Administration recently approved a new blood clot dissolving agent, which a spokesman claimed could save the lives of many people who would otherwise join this group of heart attack victims.
Q: Which of the following, if true, would seriously weaken the argument above?
A. The new agent must be administered by a team of doctors in a hospital or clinic setting.
B. Many heart attack victims die unnecessarily even though they reach a hospital or clinic in time
C. The new agent can be effectively administered prior to the victim's arrival at a hospital or clinic
D. The Food and Drug Administration has already approved agents that are at least as effective as the new drug in dissolving blood clots
E.The new blood clot dissolving agent causes kidney damage and irregular heart rates in some patients.

Please explain the answer.


A. The new agent must be administered by a team of doctors in a hospital or clinic setting. -> this is IMO answer since if the drug needs to be given in hospital then again the patients need to reach the hospitals so theres no use of such drugs
B. Many heart attack victims die unnecessarily even though they reach a hospital or clinic in time -> irrelevant
C. The new agent can be effectively administered prior to the victim's arrival at a hospital or clinic -> this strengthens
D. The Food and Drug Administration has already approved agents that are at least as effective as the new drug in dissolving blood clots -> this strengthens
E.The new blood clot dissolving agent causes kidney damage and irregular heart rates in some patients. -> this is side effects but here evidence is failure to reach hospitals which is the cause of death


How does D strengthen the passage. I get why answer is A, but it was tied with D for me.
Verbal Forum Moderator
Verbal Forum Moderator
User avatar
Status: Flying over the cloud!
Joined: 16 Aug 2011
Posts: 816
Location: Viet Nam
Concentration: International Business, Marketing
Schools: Duke '16
GMAT Date: 06-06-2014
GPA: 3.07
Followers: 33

Kudos [?]: 185 [0], given: 41

GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member CAT Tests
Re: Thousands who suffer heart attacks each year die before [#permalink] New post 02 Dec 2011, 19:20
Firstly, I do not understand the "new agent" is "drug". I think the key is here. After I understand this meaning, it is easy to me to choose the correct choice A. Thank for all explanation above.
_________________

Rules for posting in verbal gmat forum, read it before posting anything in verbal forum
Giving me + 1 kudos if my post is valuable with you :)

The more you like my post, the more you share to other's need

CR: Focus of the Week: Must be True Question

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 10 Jan 2011
Posts: 244
Location: India
GMAT Date: 07-16-2012
GPA: 3.4
WE: Consulting (Consulting)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 25

Reviews Badge
Re: Thousands who suffer heart attacks each year die before [#permalink] New post 05 Dec 2011, 00:56
fiesta wrote:
Thousands who suffer heart attacks each year die before reaching a hospital or clinic where they can benefit from the drugs that dissolve clots in coronary arteries. The Food and Drug Administration recently approved a new blood clot dissolving agent, which a spokesman claimed could save the lives of many people who would otherwise join this group of heart attack victims.

Which of the following, if true, would seriously weaken the argument above?

(A) The new agent must be administered by a team of doctors in a hospital or clinic setting.
(B) Many heart attack victims die unnecessarily even though they reach a hospital or clinic in time
(C) The new agent can be effectively administered prior to the victim's arrival at a hospital or clinic
(D) The Food and Drug Administration has already approved agents that are at least as effective as the new drug in dissolving blood clots
(E) The new blood clot dissolving agent causes kidney damage and irregular heart rates in some patients.

Please explain the answer.



people die because they are not able to reach hospital one time - fact.

conclusion : new drug can save lots of lives.

weakens: if new drug requries people who are suffering from the hart attack needs doctors supervision then people will die in transit and hence can't be saved.
_________________

-------Analyze why option A in SC wrong-------

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 08 Jun 2011
Posts: 79
Schools: NUS
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 22

GMAT ToolKit User CAT Tests
Re: Thousands who suffer heart attacks each year die before [#permalink] New post 06 Dec 2011, 08:13
A it is
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 28 Jul 2011
Posts: 583
Location: United States
Concentration: International Business, General Management
GPA: 3.86
WE: Accounting (Commercial Banking)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 36 [0], given: 16

GMAT Tests User
Re: Thousands who suffer heart attacks each year die before [#permalink] New post 11 Dec 2011, 21:40
Its A
_________________

+1 Kudos If found helpful..

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 13 Aug 2010
Posts: 316
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 1

GMAT Tests User
Re: Thousands who suffer heart attacks each year die before [#permalink] New post 13 Dec 2011, 00:47
straight A
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 07 Aug 2011
Posts: 186
Location: United States
Concentration: Technology, International Business
GMAT 1: 690 Q48 V37
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 6

GMAT Tests User
Re: Thousands who suffer heart attacks each year die before [#permalink] New post 26 Dec 2011, 11:24
A
Director
Director
User avatar
Status: Enjoying the GMAT journey....
Joined: 26 Aug 2011
Posts: 735
Location: India
GMAT 1: 620 Q49 V24
Followers: 60

Kudos [?]: 269 [0], given: 264

GMAT ToolKit User GMAT Tests User Premium Member
Re: Thousands who suffer heart attacks each year die before [#permalink] New post 27 Dec 2011, 09:47
+1 A
didn't even read B, C, .......
_________________

Fire the final bullet only when you are constantly hitting the Bull's eye, till then KEEP PRACTICING.

A WAY TO INCREASE FROM QUANT 35-40 TO 47 : a-way-to-increase-from-q35-40-to-q-138750.html

Q 47/48 To Q 50 + the-final-climb-quest-for-q-50-from-q47-129441.html#p1064367

Three good RC strategies three-different-strategies-for-attacking-rc-127287.html

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 12 Nov 2011
Posts: 55
GMAT Date: 12-15-2011
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 1

Re: Thousands who suffer heart attacks each year die before [#permalink] New post 27 Dec 2011, 18:07
A clearly
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 12 Oct 2011
Posts: 276
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 110

Re: Thousands who suffer heart attacks each year die before [#permalink] New post 02 Jan 2012, 21:42
Clearly A. If people die en route to the hospital, then the drug is futile.
_________________

Consider KUDOS if you feel the effort's worth it

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 25 Sep 2010
Posts: 85
Schools: HBS, LBS, Wharton, Kelloggs, Booth
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 15

Re: Thousands who suffer heart attacks each year die before [#permalink] New post 26 Jan 2012, 00:57
The new blood clot dissolving agent is advantageous because it will help the patient before he/she reaches the hospital. Any statement that weakens the conclusion would state that new blood clot dissolving agent may not be helpful before the patient reaches the hospital, precisely what A states.
(A) The new agent must be administered by a team of doctors in a hospital or clinic setting.
(B) Many heart attack victims die unnecessarily even though they reach a hospital or clinic in time. Irrelevant. We're not talking about ppl dying unnecessarily.
(C) The new agent can be effectively administered prior to the victim's arrival at a hospital or clinic. This statement actually STRENGTHENS the argument.
(D) The Food and Drug Administration has already approved agents that are at least as effective as the new drug in dissolving blood clots. No such comparison made. Irrelevant.
(E) The new blood clot dissolving agent causes kidney damage and irregular heart rates in some patients. Weakens, but does not address the conclusion. A seems to be the best.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 08 Jul 2008
Posts: 148
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 1

Re: Thousands who suffer heart attacks each year die before [#permalink] New post 27 Jan 2012, 16:14
Thanks for the explanation
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 23 Mar 2011
Posts: 12
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 6

Re: CR: heart attack [#permalink] New post 02 Dec 2012, 11:22
spriya wrote:
fiesta wrote:
Thousands who suffer heart attacks each year die before reaching a hospital or clinic where they can benefit from the drugs that dissolve clots in coronary arteries. The Food and Drug Administration recently approved a new blood clot dissolving agent, which a spokesman claimed could save the lives of many people who would otherwise join this group of heart attack victims.
Q: Which of the following, if true, would seriously weaken the argument above?
A. The new agent must be administered by a team of doctors in a hospital or clinic setting.
B. Many heart attack victims die unnecessarily even though they reach a hospital or clinic in time
C. The new agent can be effectively administered prior to the victim's arrival at a hospital or clinic
D. The Food and Drug Administration has already approved agents that are at least as effective as the new drug in dissolving blood clots
E.The new blood clot dissolving agent causes kidney damage and irregular heart rates in some patients.

Please explain the answer.


A. The new agent must be administered by a team of doctors in a hospital or clinic setting. -> this is IMO answer since if the drug needs to be given in hospital then again the patients need to reach the hospitals so theres no use of such drugs
B. Many heart attack victims die unnecessarily even though they reach a hospital or clinic in time -> irrelevant
C. The new agent can be effectively administered prior to the victim's arrival at a hospital or clinic -> this strengthens
D. The Food and Drug Administration has already approved agents that are at least as effective as the new drug in dissolving blood clots -> this strengthens
E.The new blood clot dissolving agent causes kidney damage and irregular heart rates in some patients. -> this is side effects but here evidence is failure to reach hospitals which is the cause of death


Hello my friend!!!

Could you please explain why D is incorrect.
I don't see how it strenthens it since I am interpreting the D as following:
"The Food and Drug Administration has already approved agents, which is also effective" BUT the situation remain the same, meaning people are still dieing before reaching to hospital, even though the effective method has existed before the introduction of agent. I thought D is superior than A.
Thank you!
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 23 Mar 2011
Posts: 12
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 6

Re: Thousands who suffer heart attacks each year die before [#permalink] New post 03 Dec 2012, 15:13
Hi folks!!!

Could you please explain why D is incorrect.
I don't see how it strenthens it since I am interpreting the D as following:
"The Food and Drug Administration has already approved agents, which is also effective" BUT the situation remain the same, meaning people are still dieing before reaching to hospital, even though the effective method has existed before the introduction of agent. I thought D is superior than A.
Thank you!
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 13 Aug 2012
Posts: 464
Concentration: Marketing, Finance
GMAT 1: Q V0
GPA: 3.23
Followers: 14

Kudos [?]: 180 [0], given: 11

GMAT ToolKit User GMAT Tests User
Re: Thousands who suffer heart attacks each year die before [#permalink] New post 26 Feb 2013, 03:16
fiesta wrote:
Thousands who suffer heart attacks each year die before reaching a hospital or clinic where they can benefit from the drugs that dissolve clots in coronary arteries. The Food and Drug Administration recently approved a new blood clot dissolving agent, which a spokesman claimed could save the lives of many people who would otherwise join this group of heart attack victims.

Which of the following, if true, would seriously weaken the argument above?

(A) The new agent must be administered by a team of doctors in a hospital or clinic setting.
(B) Many heart attack victims die unnecessarily even though they reach a hospital or clinic in time
(C) The new agent can be effectively administered prior to the victim's arrival at a hospital or clinic
(D) The Food and Drug Administration has already approved agents that are at least as effective as the new drug in dissolving blood clots
(E) The new blood clot dissolving agent causes kidney damage and irregular heart rates in some patients.

Please explain the answer.


A is correct. Thousands die before reaching hospital. If the agent still needs to be administered in hospitals then, still thousands will die.
B. we need something that weakens the claim about the new agent.. This doesn't weaken the argument.
C. Strengthens the argument. Incorrect.
D. Other drugs doesn't hurt the argument
E. if this is true, maybe 1 out of every hours and die because of that.. Still those saved is significant...

Answer: A
_________________

Impossible is nothing to God.

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 25 Jul 2012
Posts: 80
Location: United States
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 137

Re: Thousands who suffer heart attacks each year die before [#permalink] New post 26 Feb 2013, 16:44
GMATtaker777 wrote:
Hi folks!!!

Could you please explain why D is incorrect.
I don't see how it strengthens it since I am interpreting the D as following:
"The Food and Drug Administration has already approved agents, which is also effective" BUT the situation remain the same, meaning people are still dieing before reaching to hospital, even though the effective method has existed before the introduction of agent. I thought D is superior than A.
Thank you!



Thousands who suffer heart attacks each year die before reaching a hospital or clinic where they can benefit from the drugs that dissolve clots in coronary arteries. The Food and Drug Administration recently approved a new blood clot dissolving agent, which a spokesman claimed could save the lives of many people who would otherwise join this group of heart attack victims.

Which of the following, if true, would seriously weaken the argument above?


What does the argument say? It states in the first sentence that people die before they even reach the hospital (THIS IS KEY). So the FDA has recently approved a new medication which will help these thousands of people who are having heart attacks. The conclusion: the spokesmen CLAIMS (conclusion indicator) that this could save the many lives of these people who are having heart attacks.

Now when dealing with CR weakening questions think in your head:

"What would totally destroy the conclusion?"
"What additional info will mess up the though process of the argument?"
"What would backfire on the plan?"



(A) The new agent must be administered by a team of doctors in a hospital or clinic setting. correct When first reading this, this looks very attractive to totally destroy the spokesman's conclusion. Think about it, what's the point of the medication if it can only be used in a clinic or a hospital? The first sentence clearly states that people die ON THE WAY to the hospital. So by the time they arrive to hospital, chances are death is upon them.



(D) The Food and Drug Administration has already approved agents that are at least as effective as the new drug in dissolving blood clots incorrect This answer looks attractive as your initial thought probably is "yeah this looks good because if there are already drugs that have the same effect, what's the point?" However, you have to take into consideration the premise and conclusion of the argument. The argument is only talking about the new drug, other drugs would be irrelevant.

Remember weakening questions, a lot of the times, try to trap you with irrelevant information that looks attractive and answers that actually strengthen argument

_________________

If my post has contributed to your learning or teaching in any way, feel free to hit the kudos button ^_^

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 20 Oct 2013
Posts: 76
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 13

GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: Thousands who suffer heart attacks each year die before [#permalink] New post 03 Dec 2013, 06:48
A) Hospital or clinic's setting is required, but many patients die before reaching hospital/clinic => the new agent shouldn't be as effective as claimed

B) This fact doesn't have any impact on the new agent's effect.

C) This stat supports the argument, not weaken.

D) Also do the opposite: support the argument.

E) Even if this choice is true, it requires an assumption "kidney damage and irregular heart rates usually result in heart attacks" to seriously weaken the original argument.

Pick A.
Re: Thousands who suffer heart attacks each year die before   [#permalink] 03 Dec 2013, 06:48
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
1 Elderly women who have suffered heart attacks are five times nusmavrik 22 28 Jun 2010, 19:35
Of 2,500 people who survived a first heart attack, those who noboru 7 03 Jun 2010, 04:06
2 Elderly women who have suffered heart attacks are five times netcaesar 25 28 Aug 2009, 10:59
cr-heart attack AK47 5 02 Feb 2007, 07:54
CR: Heart attack WinWinMBA 8 07 Jun 2005, 16:04
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Thousands who suffer heart attacks each year die before

  Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Go to page   Previous    1   2   3    Next  [ 41 posts ] 



cron

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Privacy Policy| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.