Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

Three straight metal rods have an average (arithmetic mean) [#permalink]

Show Tags

27 Feb 2013, 22:23

5

This post was BOOKMARKED

00:00

A

B

C

D

E

Difficulty:

15% (low)

Question Stats:

74% (01:59) correct
26% (01:11) wrong based on 258 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Three straight metal rods have an average (arithmetic mean) length of 77 inches and the shortest rod has a length of 65 inches. What is the maximum possible value of the median length, in inches, of the three rods?

Re: Three straight metal rods have an average (arithmetic mean) [#permalink]

Show Tags

27 Feb 2013, 23:32

We know that there are 3 metal rods with an average length of 77 inches. Total length=77*3=231 inches Shortest rod length=65 inches the sum of lengths of the two longer rods=231-65=166 Since, the longer rods have to be longer than 65, the smallest value one of these longer values could have is 66.

Now the question asks us for the longest median value. The median value is the middle value when the three rods are arranged in ascending order of lengths.

There are two ways of finding these values 1. Since we need to find the largest middle value, the two longer rods need to be of equal length. If both values are equal in length the middle value will be the largest possible value and the longest rod will be of the same length as the rod of median length. Hence, 2x =166 implies x=83.

Maximum length of the median rod=83

2. Testing the values given Let us test the values from the bottom

e=89 166-89=77. Since 77 is less than 89, it cannot be the median value. WRONG

d=83 166-83=83. Both the rods are of the same length. Hence, this is the largest possible middle value.

DelSingh wrote:

Three straight metal rods have an average (arithmetic mean) length of 77 inches and the shortest rod has a length of 65 inches. What is the maximum possible value of the median length, in inches, of the three rods?

Re: Three straight metal rods have an average (arithmetic mean) [#permalink]

Show Tags

28 Feb 2013, 01:17

1

This post received KUDOS

Expert's post

2

This post was BOOKMARKED

DelSingh wrote:

Three straight metal rods have an average (arithmetic mean) length of 77 inches and the shortest rod has a length of 65 inches. What is the maximum possible value of the median length, in inches, of the three rods?

A. 71 B. 77 C. 80 D. 83 E. 89

Source: GMAT Prep Question Pack 1 Rated: Medium

If you know of any similar problems, please post.

Say the lengths of the rods in ascending order are \(x_1\), \(x_2\), and \(x_3\), where \(x_1\leq{x_2}\leq{x_3}\).

The median of a set with odd number of terms is just the middle term, when arranged in ascending/descending order, hence the median is \(x_2\).

Given that \(x_1+x_2+x_3=3*77\) --> \(65+x_2+x_3=3*77\) --> \(x_2+x_3=166\). We need to maximize \(x_2=median\), so we need to minimize \(x_3\).

The minimum value of \(x_3\) is \(x_2\) --> \(x_2+x_2=166\) --> \(x_2=median=83\).

Re: Three straight metal rods have an average (arithmetic mean) [#permalink]

Show Tags

28 Feb 2013, 04:55

1

This post received KUDOS

Expert's post

DelSingh wrote:

Three straight metal rods have an average (arithmetic mean) length of 77 inches and the shortest rod has a length of 65 inches. What is the maximum possible value of the median length, in inches, of the three rods?

A. 71 B. 77 C. 80 D. 83 E. 89

If you know of any similar problems, please post.

Because it is mentioned that the average length of the three rods is 77 inches, we can assume there are three rods each of length 77 inches. Now we have been told that the shortest rod has a length of 65 inches. Thus, we can take 12 inches from one of the rods and will have to adjust it amongst the other two remaining rods. Now, if we divide 12 in any proportion other than 6 and 6, we will not have the maximum value for the median. Imagine, we redistribute 12 by giving 5 to one and 7 to another. This gives 65, 82 and 84. Thus, giving 6 to both the rods, we have (77+6) = 83 inches for both the rods.

Re: Three straight metal rods have an average (arithmetic mean) [#permalink]

Show Tags

21 Aug 2013, 21:41

Smallest rod = 65 Average of all 3 rods = 77

Lets consider middle rod = 77, so the largest rod (x) calculation is: 65 + x = 77*2 x = 154 - 65 = 89. Now, considering that middle rod = 77, the max lenght of the largest rod would be = 89. So the max length of the middle rod possible = Avg of 89 & 77 = (89 +77)/2 = 83 Answer = D = 83 _________________

Re: Three straight metal rods have an average (arithmetic mean) [#permalink]

Show Tags

07 Dec 2014, 13:04

Bunuel wrote:

DelSingh wrote:

Three straight metal rods have an average (arithmetic mean) length of 77 inches and the shortest rod has a length of 65 inches. What is the maximum possible value of the median length, in inches, of the three rods?

A. 71 B. 77 C. 80 D. 83 E. 89

Source: GMAT Prep Question Pack 1 Rated: Medium

If you know of any similar problems, please post.

Say the lengths of the rods in ascending order are \(x_1\), \(x_2\), and \(x_3\), where \(x_1\leq{x_2}\leq{x_3}\).

The median of a set with odd number of terms is just the middle term, when arranged in ascending/descending order, hence the median is \(x_2\).

Given that \(x_1+x_2+x_3=3*77\) --> \(65+x_2+x_3=3*77\) --> \(x_2+x_3=166\). We need to maximize \(x_2=median\), so we need to minimize \(x_3\).

The minimum value of \(x_3\) is \(x_2\) --> \(x_2+x_2=166\) --> \(x_2=median=83\).

Re: Three straight metal rods have an average (arithmetic mean) [#permalink]

Show Tags

08 Dec 2014, 03:23

Expert's post

russ9 wrote:

Bunuel wrote:

DelSingh wrote:

Three straight metal rods have an average (arithmetic mean) length of 77 inches and the shortest rod has a length of 65 inches. What is the maximum possible value of the median length, in inches, of the three rods?

A. 71 B. 77 C. 80 D. 83 E. 89

Source: GMAT Prep Question Pack 1 Rated: Medium

If you know of any similar problems, please post.

Say the lengths of the rods in ascending order are \(x_1\), \(x_2\), and \(x_3\), where \(x_1\leq{x_2}\leq{x_3}\).

The median of a set with odd number of terms is just the middle term, when arranged in ascending/descending order, hence the median is \(x_2\).

Given that \(x_1+x_2+x_3=3*77\) --> \(65+x_2+x_3=3*77\) --> \(x_2+x_3=166\). We need to maximize \(x_2=median\), so we need to minimize \(x_3\).

The minimum value of \(x_3\) is \(x_2\) --> \(x_2+x_2=166\) --> \(x_2=median=83\).

Is there a reason we cannot assume that the median is the mean in this case? Does that ONLY apply to evenly spaced sets?

For an evenly spaced set (arithmetic progression), the median equals to the mean. Though the reverse is not necessarily true. Consider {0, 1, 1, 2} --> median = mean = 1 but the set is not evenly spaced.

So, for the original question we cannot assume that the mean and the median are the same. _________________

Three straight metal rods have an average (arithmetic mean) [#permalink]

Show Tags

26 Aug 2015, 00:16

we can solve by eliminating the options. avg is 77, lets assume the 3 rods are 77,77,77.

But the shortest is 65. In order to maximize median, the other 2 rods should have the same, highest possible value.

option a - if 2nd rod is 71, 3rd rod will be greater than 77 as the avg has to be 77. eliminate

option b - if 2nd rod is 77, 3rd rod will be greater than 77 as the smallest is 65 and avg has to be 77. eliminate

option c - if 2nd rod is 80, 3rd also has to be 80...but the sum (65 + 80 + 80) of 3 rods ends with 5(unit digit)...but we need the sum to end with 1(77*3). eliminate

option d can also be eliminated on similar lines (as mentioned in option c).

Re: Three straight metal rods have an average (arithmetic mean) [#permalink]

Show Tags

19 Sep 2015, 20:02

Here is another way. We know that shortest rod is 65 so, 77-65 = 12 is the additional lenght to be distributed between other 2 rods.

There are 2 ways to do that.

1. distribute equally so data points will be 65, 83, 83 ( 6 given to each remaining data point ) 2. distribute unequally 65, 65, 89 ( median will be minimized )

so, 83 is the max value of the median. _________________

Its not over yet!!!

gmatclubot

Re: Three straight metal rods have an average (arithmetic mean)
[#permalink]
19 Sep 2015, 20:02

Part 2 of the GMAT: How I tackled the GMAT and improved a disappointing score Apologies for the month gap. I went on vacation and had to finish up a...

I’m a little delirious because I’m a little sleep deprived. But whatever. I have to write this post because... I’M IN! Funnily enough, I actually missed the acceptance phone...

So the last couple of weeks have seen a flurry of discussion in our MBA class Whatsapp group around Brexit, the referendum and currency exchange. Most of us believed...

This highly influential bestseller was first published over 25 years ago. I had wanted to read this book for a long time and I finally got around to it...