Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

Thurston wrote an important seven-digit phone number on a na [#permalink]
12 Sep 2013, 03:25

10

This post was BOOKMARKED

00:00

A

B

C

D

E

Difficulty:

85% (hard)

Question Stats:

48% (03:11) correct
52% (02:00) wrong based on 139 sessions

Thurston wrote an important seven-digit phone number on a napkin, but the last three numbers got smudged. Thurston remembers only that the last three digits contained at least one zero and at least one non-zero integer. If Thurston dials 10 phone numbers by using the readable digits followed by 10 different random combinations of three digits, each with at least one zero and at least one non-zero integer, what is the probability that he will dial the original number correctly?

Re: Thurston wrote an important seven-digit phone number on a na [#permalink]
12 Sep 2013, 03:33

The answer is 1/27.

Our first step is determining how many possible three-digit numbers there are with at least one zero and one nonzero. Treat this like a permutations question in which you could have any of the following six sequences, where N = non-zero integer. 0NN, N0N, NN0, N00, 00N, 0N0

There are 9 numbers that could appear in the N-slots and 1 number (zero) that could appear in the zero slots. Each sequence with two nonzero numbers will have 81 possible outcomes (1 * 9 * 9, or 9 * 1 * 9, or 9 * 9 * 1), while each sequence with one nonzero will have 9 possible outcomes (9 * 1 * 1, or 1 * 1 * 9, or 1 * 9 * 1). The total number of possible three-digit numbers here is 81 * 3 + 9 * 3 = 270.

Thurston calls 10 of these numbers, so the odds of dialing the right one are 10/270 = 1/27.

Re: Thurston wrote an important seven-digit phone number on a na [#permalink]
12 Sep 2013, 03:36

Expert's post

shameekv wrote:

Thurston wrote an important seven-digit phone number on a napkin, but the last three numbers got smudged. Thurston remembers only that the last three digits contained at least one zero and at least one non-zero integer. If Thurston dials 10 phone numbers by using the readable digits followed by 10 different random combinations of three digits, each with at least one zero and at least one non-zero integer, what is the probability that he will dial the original number correctly?

A. 1/9 B. 10/243 C. 1/27 D. 10/271 E. 1/1000000

If the last three digits have 1 zero (XX0), the total # of numbers possible is 9*9*3 (multiply by 3 since XX0 can be arranged in 3 ways: XX0, X0X, or 0XX).

If the last three digits have 2 zeros (X00), the total # of numbers possible is 9*3 (multiply by 3 since X00 can be arranged in 3 ways: X00, 00X, or X0X).

Re: Thurston wrote an important seven-digit phone number on a na [#permalink]
12 Sep 2013, 03:39

Expert's post

Bunuel wrote:

shameekv wrote:

Thurston wrote an important seven-digit phone number on a napkin, but the last three numbers got smudged. Thurston remembers only that the last three digits contained at least one zero and at least one non-zero integer. If Thurston dials 10 phone numbers by using the readable digits followed by 10 different random combinations of three digits, each with at least one zero and at least one non-zero integer, what is the probability that he will dial the original number correctly?

A. 1/9 B. 10/243 C. 1/27 D. 10/271 E. 1/1000000

If the last three digits have 1 zero (XX0), the total # of numerous possible is 9*9*3 (multiply by 3 since XX0 can be arranged in 3 ways: XX0, X0X, or 0XX). If the last three digits have 2 zeros (X00), the total # of numerous possible is 9*3 (multiply by 3 since X00 can be arranged in 3 ways: X00, 00X, or X0X).

Re: Thurston wrote an important seven-digit phone number on a na [#permalink]
16 Mar 2014, 21:05

If the last three digits have 1 zero (XX0), the total # of numbers possible is 9*9*3 (multiply by 3 since XX0 can be arranged in 3 ways: XX0, X0X, or 0XX).

If the last three digits have 2 zeros (X00), the total # of numbers possible is 9*3 (multiply by 3 since X00 can be arranged in 3 ways: X00, 00X, or X0X).

P = 10/(9*9*3+9*3) = 1/27.

Answer: C.

Hi Bunuel,

Since I got this question wrong, I need insights on this.

We have two options of using either (1).two zeros and a non-zero or (2). two non-zero and a zero.

In the above solution when you say XX0 can be arranged in 3 ways, since the problem is that you are considering XX as a unique single digit non-zero. However, there can be a case where 450 and 540 can be the numbers in which case the permutation will come out different.

We can consider permutations in

N00 as 3 since 0 is a unique number and we have 9 possibilities for 'N'.So, we have

9 possibilities for N and arrangement of NOO which would be !3/!2 (Divide by !2 since 0 are unique) =27

NN0

9 possibilities for each N and arrangement of NNO which would be !3 (Not divide by !2 since N is not unique) =9*9*6

Please suggest where I am going wrong in this one

Rgds, TGC! _________________

Rgds, TGC! _____________________________________________________________________ I Assisted You => KUDOS Please _____________________________________________________________________________

Re: Thurston wrote an important seven-digit phone number on a na [#permalink]
26 Mar 2014, 10:03

Can someone please explain why we divide 10 to 270. I know that the probability means dividing desired outcome to possible outcomes. Here desired outcome is just one number not ten.

Re: Thurston wrote an important seven-digit phone number on a na [#permalink]
26 Mar 2014, 10:15

Expert's post

Ergenekon wrote:

Can someone please explain why we divide 10 to 270. I know that the probability means dividing desired outcome to possible outcomes. Here desired outcome is just one number not ten.

But Thurston tries 10 times not just 1:

"If Thurston dials 10 phone numbers by using the readable digits followed by 10 different random combinations of three digits, each with at least one zero and at least one non-zero integer, what is the probability that he will dial the original number correctly?" _________________

Re: Thurston wrote an important seven-digit phone number on a na [#permalink]
30 Mar 2014, 01:38

Hi.

Please explain why after find the total possible number of the telephone numbers, we have 10 divided by 270? I have thought that the chance that there is one correct phone numbers and 9 incorrect phone numbers is:

(1/270)*[(269/270)^9]*10!

The correct answer choice seems to indicate that each pick does not relate to the later picks, but the chance to pick the correct phone numbers increases after each pick, it isn't? That is why I multiply the chance to get correct phone numbers and the chance to get incorrect phone numbers.

Thurston wrote an important seven-digit phone number on a na [#permalink]
21 Jul 2014, 07:16

Bunuel wrote:

If the last three digits have 1 zero (XX0), the total # of numbers possible is 9*9*3 (multiply by 3 since XX0 can be arranged in 3 ways: XX0, X0X, or 0XX).

If the last three digits have 2 zeros (X00), the total # of numbers possible is 9*3 (multiply by 3 since X00 can be arranged in 3 ways: X00, 00X, or X0X).

P = 10/(9*9*3+9*3) = 1/27.

Answer: C.

Hi Bunuel,

I have a Query. In case 1 where there is only one zero, XX0 can also be XY0, in that case should it not be multiplied by 3! (i.e. 6)? For. example 3,2,0 can be written in 6 ways.

Re: Thurston wrote an important seven-digit phone number on a na [#permalink]
21 Jul 2014, 09:20

Expert's post

1

This post was BOOKMARKED

arichinna wrote:

Bunuel wrote:

If the last three digits have 1 zero (XX0), the total # of numbers possible is 9*9*3 (multiply by 3 since XX0 can be arranged in 3 ways: XX0, X0X, or 0XX).

If the last three digits have 2 zeros (X00), the total # of numbers possible is 9*3 (multiply by 3 since X00 can be arranged in 3 ways: X00, 00X, or X0X).

P = 10/(9*9*3+9*3) = 1/27.

Answer: C.

Hi Bunuel,

I have a Query. In case 1 where there is only one zero, XX0 can also be XY0, in that case should it not be multiplied by 3! (i.e. 6)? For. example 3,2,0 can be written in 6 ways.

Thanks in advance for your clarification.

The point is that 9*9 gives all possible ordered pairs of the remaining two digits:

11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 21 ... 99

Now, 0, in three digits can take either first, second or third place, hence multiplying by 3: XX0, X0X, 0XX.

Thurston wrote an important seven-digit phone number on a na [#permalink]
15 Oct 2014, 10:01

Bunuel wrote:

arichinna wrote:

Bunuel wrote:

If the last three digits have 1 zero (XX0), the total # of numbers possible is 9*9*3 (multiply by 3 since XX0 can be arranged in 3 ways: XX0, X0X, or 0XX).

If the last three digits have 2 zeros (X00), the total # of numbers possible is 9*3 (multiply by 3 since X00 can be arranged in 3 ways: X00, 00X, or X0X).

P = 10/(9*9*3+9*3) = 1/27.

Answer: C.

Hi Bunuel,

I have a Query. In case 1 where there is only one zero, XX0 can also be XY0, in that case should it not be multiplied by 3! (i.e. 6)? For. example 3,2,0 can be written in 6 ways.

Thanks in advance for your clarification.

The point is that 9*9 gives all possible ordered pairs of the remaining two digits:

11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 21 ... 99

Now, 0, in three digits can take either first, second or third place, hence multiplying by 3: XX0, X0X, 0XX.

Re: Thurston wrote an important seven-digit phone number on a na [#permalink]
15 Oct 2014, 10:16

Expert's post

Thoughtosphere wrote:

Bunuel wrote:

arichinna wrote:

[

Hi Bunuel,

I have a Query. In case 1 where there is only one zero, XX0 can also be XY0, in that case should it not be multiplied by 3! (i.e. 6)? For. example 3,2,0 can be written in 6 ways.

Thanks in advance for your clarification.

The point is that 9*9 gives all possible ordered pairs of the remaining two digits:

11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 21 ... 99

Now, 0, in three digits can take either first, second or third place, hence multiplying by 3: XX0, X0X, 0XX.

I didn't get this explanation. Why are we taking XX0 and not XY0, because the non-zero numbers can also be different. Such as

120 102 210 201 012 021

Which should lead to 6 combinations - 3*2*1 = 6

Thanks

12 and 21 in your example are treated as two different numbers in my explanation. So, when I multiply by 3 I get the same result as you when you multiply by 6.

Sorry, cannot explain any better than this: 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 21 ... 99

Total of 81 numbers. 0 in three digits can take either first, second or third place, hence multiplying by 3: XX0, X0X, 0XX. _________________

I couldn’t help myself but stay impressed. young leader who can now basically speak Chinese and handle things alone (I’m Korean Canadian by the way, so...