|
Author |
Message |
|
TAGS:
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 11 Jul 2006
Posts: 386
Location: TX
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
5
[0], given: 0
|
Time yourself 2 mins Laws requiring the use of headlights [#permalink]
03 Oct 2006, 18:30
Question Stats:
0% (00:00) correct
0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
Time yourself 2 mins
Laws requiring the use of headlights during daylight hours can prevent automobile collisions. However, since daylight visibility is worse in countries farther from the equator, any such laws would obviously be more effective in preventing collisions in those countries. In fact, the only countries that actually have such laws are farther from the equator than is the continental United States.
Which of the following conclusions could be most properly drawn from the information given above?
(A) Drivers in the continental United States who used their headlights during the day would be just as likely to become involved in a collision as would drivers who did not use their headlights.
(B) In many countries that are farther from the equator than is the continental United States, poor daylight visibility is the single most important factor in automobile collisions.
(C) The proportion of automobile collisions that occur in the daytime is greater in the continental United States than in the countries that have daytime headlight laws.
(D) Fewer automobile collisions probably occur each year in countries that have daytime headlight laws than occur within the continental United States.
(E) Daytime headlight laws would probably do less to prevent automobile collisions in the continental United States than they do in the countries that have the laws.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
VP
Joined: 25 Jun 2006
Posts: 1185
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
16
[0], given: 0
|
E for m2.
|
|
|
|
|
|
SVP
Joined: 24 Sep 2005
Posts: 1913
Followers: 6
Kudos [?]:
55
[0], given: 0
|
Re: CR - automobile collisions [#permalink]
03 Oct 2006, 20:33
Laws requiring the use of headlights during daylight hours can prevent automobile collisions. However, since daylight visibility is worse in countries farther from the equator, any such laws would obviously be more effective in preventing collisions in those countries. In fact, the only countries that actually have such laws are farther from the equator than is the continental United States.
Which of the following conclusions could be most properly drawn from the information given above?
(A) Drivers in the continental United States who used their headlights during the day would be just as likely to become involved in a collision as would drivers who did not use their headlights.
---> it doesn't sum up all the premises ---> can't be a conclusion.
(B) In many countries that are farther from the equator than is the continental United States, poor daylight visibility is the single most important factor in automobile collisions.
---> no point in the passage indicates this ---> out.
(C) The proportion of automobile collisions that occur in the daytime is greater in the continental United States than in the countries that have daytime headlight laws.
-----> US is better than farther countries in term of being closer to the equator; however, US is worse than farther countries in term of not having such laws -----> positive side + negative side ----> the result is not necessarily negative ----> C is not applausible ---> out.
(D) Fewer automobile collisions probably occur each year in countries that have daytime headlight laws than occur within the continental United States.
----> Same to C
(E) Daytime headlight laws would probably do less to prevent automobile collisions in the continental United States than they do in the countries that have the laws.
-----> Yeah, the reason why US doesn't have such laws is probably because such laws do less to prevent automobile collisions in US than they do in farther countries. ----> applausible. Note that the use of "would probably" makes E least vulnerable to criticism!
Go for E.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Joined: 18 Jul 2006
Posts: 536
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
14
[0], given: 0
|
Straight E.
|
|
|
|
|
|
VP
Joined: 21 Aug 2006
Posts: 1026
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
12
[0], given: 0
|
B is a sweeping conclusion. We need more information to come to that conclusion.
E is the possible answer.
this statement makes it clear. "any such laws would obviously be more effective in preventing collisions in those countries"
more effective because, there is more chance of collisions
_________________
The path is long, but self-surrender makes it short;
the way is difficult, but perfect trust makes it easy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 31 Aug 2006
Posts: 215
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
2
[0], given: 0
|
E it is.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 16 Aug 2006
Posts: 69
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
1
[0], given: 0
|
E in 2 mins 5 secs...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 11 Jul 2006
Posts: 386
Location: TX
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
5
[0], given: 0
|
OA is E
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Student
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Posts: 5289
Followers: 17
Kudos [?]:
90
[0], given: 0
|
Raising the minimum driving age to 18, or even 21, would probably be the most effective way to reduce the number of annual auto accidents in the continental US. This one is a clear (E). <--- I meant E!
* The disclaimer here is continental. Otherwise we would have to consider Alaska, which is dark 24 hours a day three months out of the year.
Last edited by GMATT73 on 07 Oct 2006, 02:01, edited 1 time in total.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Joined: 23 Jun 2005
Posts: 853
GMAT 1: 740 Q48 V42
Followers: 3
Kudos [?]:
9
[0], given: 1
|
Less than a minute to arrive at E
Countries farther from the equator than continental US have poorer daylight visibility. They have mandatory daytime headlight laws.
Since visibility in US is better than those countries, the benefits of the law will be less significant in the US.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 21 Aug 2006
Posts: 39
Location: LA California
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
1
[0], given: 0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 21 Aug 2006
Posts: 39
Location: LA California
Followers: 1
Kudos [?]:
1
[0], given: 0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 03 Apr 2006
Posts: 17
Location: Nebraska
Followers: 0
Kudos [?]:
0
[0], given: 0
|
Another vote for E
|
|
|
|
|
|
VP
Joined: 21 Mar 2006
Posts: 1138
Location: Bangalore
Followers: 2
Kudos [?]:
14
[0], given: 0
|
Late, but easy E.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderators:
metallicafan, rajeevrks27, souvik101990, PTK, MacFauz, noboru, kissthegmat, carcass, willigetmylifeback, mikemcgarry, doe007, Vercules, Legendaddy, tuanquang269, RaviChandra, Marcab, Narenn
|